Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Thomas Mann (2010)
Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics byMorris FiorinaPolitical Science Quarterly, 125
Iris Hui (2013)
Who is Your Preferred Neighbor? Partisan Residential Preferences and Neighborhood SatisfactionAmerican Politics Research, 41
T. Ryan, Ted Brader (2015)
Gaffe Appeal A Field Experiment on Partisan Selective Exposure to Election Messages*Political Science Research and Methods, 5
(1995)
Voice and Equality
Sebastian Calonico, M. Cattaneo, R. Titiunik (2014)
Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression‐Discontinuity DesignsEconometrica, 82
John Bullock, A. Gerber, Seth Hill, G. Huber (2013)
Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs About PoliticsPSN: Political Parties (Topic)
G. Kaebnick (2005)
Liberals and ConservativesHastings Center Report, 35
Karen Gift, Thomas Gift (2015)
Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized ExperimentPolitical Behavior, 37
Taeku Lee (2002)
Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and Racial Attitudes in the Civil Rights Era
J. Sekhon (2008)
Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization: The Matching Package for RInformation Technology & Systems eJournal
(2015)
Can Primary Electoral Institutions Reduce Partisan Polarization? A Field Experiment of Legislative Campaigns
David Broockman, Daniel Butler, Nick Carnes, Ryan Enos, Don Green, Justin Grimmer, Eitan Hersh, Dan Hopkins, Francesca Jensenius, Karen Jusko, Gabriel Lenz, Melissa Michelson, Scott Nelson, Takuya Sawaoka, E. Schickler, Rob Houweling (2014)
Distorted Communication, Unequal Representation: Constituents Communicate Less to Representatives Not of Their RaceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 58
R. McDonald (2001)
Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Participation in AmericaJournal of Government Information, 28
Jason Barabas (2011)
Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and PolicyPublic Opinion Quarterly, 75
N. McCarty, K. Poole, H. Rosenthal (2009)
Does Gerrymandering Cause PolarizationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 53
S. Rosenstone, J. Hansen (1993)
Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America
Sebastian Calonico, M. Cattaneo, R. Titiunik (2014)
Robust Data-Driven Inference in the Regression-Discontinuity DesignThe Stata Journal, 14
S. Iyengar, G. Sood, Yphtach Lelkes (2012)
Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on PolarizationPublic Opinion Quarterly, 76
J. Richeson, Sophie Trawalter (2005)
Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account.Journal of personality and social psychology, 88 6
Warren Miller, Donald Stokes (1963)
Constituency Influence in CongressAmerican Political Science Review, 57
George Serra, Albert Cover (1992)
The Electoral Consequences of Perquisite Use: The Casework CaseLegislative Studies Quarterly, 17
Casey Klofstad, Rose McDermott, P. Hatemi (2013)
The Dating Preferences of Liberals and ConservativesPolitical Behavior, 35
Alexander George, Eugene Miller, David Braybrooke, Alexander, Rosenberg, Richard Rudner, Hugh Stevenson (1972)
PSR volume 66 issue 3 Cover and Front matterAmerican Political Science Review, 66
Daniel Butler, David Nickerson (2011)
Can Learning Constituency Opinion Affect How Legislators Vote? Results from a Field ExperimentQuarterly Journal of Political Science, 6
Jane Mansbridge (1999)
Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"The Journal of Politics, 61
Dale Miller (2014)
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and ReligionUtilitas, 26
Ross Baker (2003)
Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations. By Wendy J. Schiller. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000. 199p. $49.50 cloth, $18.95 paperPerspectives on Politics, 1
Ryan Enos, Anthony Fowler, Lynn Vavreck (2014)
Increasing Inequality: The Effect of GOTV Mobilization on the Composition of the ElectorateThe Journal of Politics, 76
D. Zillmann (1999)
Exemplification Theory: Judging the Whole by Some of Its PartsMedia Psychology, 1
Richard Fenno (1977)
U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An ExplorationAmerican Political Science Review, 71
Laurel Harbridge, Neil Malhotra, B. Harrison (2014)
Public Preferences for Bipartisanship in the Policymaking ProcessLegislative Studies Quarterly, 39
M. Carpini, S. Keeter (1996)
What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters
Devin Pope, Joseph Price, J. Wolfers (2013)
Awareness Reduces Racial BiasLabor: Personnel Economics eJournal
J. Thomas (1982)
Citizen-initiated Contacts with Government Agencies: A Test of Three TheoriesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 26
Wendy Cho, J. Gimpel, Iris Hui (2013)
Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American ElectorateAnnals of the Association of American Geographers, 103
D. Green, Bradley Palmquist, E. Schickler (2002)
Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters
J. Zaller (1992)
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion: Contents
Ryan Enos (2016)
What the Demolition of Public Housing Teaches Us about the Impact of Racial Threat on Political BehaviorAmerican Journal of Political Science, 60
J. Blascovich, W. Mendes, S. Hunter, Brian Lickel, Neneh Kowai-Bell (2001)
Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others.Journal of personality and social psychology, 80 2
Daniel Butler, Christopher Karpowitz, J. Pope (2012)
A Field Experiment on Legislators’ Home Styles: Service versus PolicyThe Journal of Politics, 74
E. Plant, P. Devine, A. Bogie, Sarah Madeska, Erin Goldman, Jen Junion, Maggie Dresen, A. Dehaven, Rachael More, Sarah Peterson, A. Piel, Rachel Rock, Stacey Tobias, A. Plant (2003)
The Antecedents and Implications of Interracial AnxietyPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29
A. Gerber, G. Huber (2009)
Partisanship and Economic Behavior: Do Partisan Differences in Economic Forecasts Predict Real Economic Behavior?American Political Science Review, 103
J. Alford, P. Hatemi, John Hibbing, N. Martin, L. Eaves (2011)
The Politics of Mate ChoiceThe Journal of Politics, 73
J. Tudorhart (1961)
On the nature of prejudice.The Eugenics review, 53 2
Bernard Silverman (1987)
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Alberto Abadie, G. Imbens (2004)
Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment EffectsEconometrica, 74
S. Iyengar, S. Westwood (2015)
Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group PolarizationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 59
Justin Grimmer (2013)
Appropriators not Position Takers: The Distorting Effects of Electoral Incentives on Congressional RepresentationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 57
D. Bergan, R. Cole (2013)
Call Your Legislator: A Field Experimental Study of the Impact of Citizen Contacts on Legislative Voting
Richard Fenno (2008)
The American Congress Reader: U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies
S. Greene (1999)
Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity ApproachPolitical Psychology, 20
Devin Caughey, J. Sekhon (2011)
Elections and the Regression Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races, 1942–2008Political Analysis, 19
J. Thomas, Gregory Streib (2003)
The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-GovernmentJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13
A. Gerber, Donald Green (2000)
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field ExperimentAmerican Political Science Review, 94
(2009)
A Field Experiment Measuring the Effects of an e-Mail Lobbying Campaign on Legislative Behavior
John Kingdon (1973)
Congressmen's voting decisions
Mean levels of Copartisan Preference, depending on experimental condition. Whiskers indicate standard errors
H. Simon (1956)
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.Psychological review, 63 2
T. Ryan (2017)
No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized AttitudesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 61
Daniel Butler, David Broockman (2011)
Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State LegislatorsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 55
(1960)
The Semisovereign People
(2012)
Americans Love Hawaii, Dislike California
Ryan Enos (2014)
Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111
Richard Hall, F. Wayman (1990)
Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional CommitteesAmerican Political Science Review, 84
Charles Taber, M. Lodge (2006)
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political BeliefsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 50
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1981)
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science, 211 4481
N. Stroud (2011)
Niche News: The Politics of News Choice
David Lee (2005)
Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House electionsJournal of Econometrics, 142
(2012)
The Unheavenly Chorus
(2011)
Communicating with Congress: Perceptions of Citizen Advocacy on Capitol Hill
Andrew Eggers, Jens Hainmueller (2009)
MPs for Sale? Returns to Office in Postwar British PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 103
K. Poole, H. Rosenthal (2007)
on party polarization in CongressDaedalus, 136
J. Snyder, S. Ansolabehere (2001)
Candidate Positioning in U.S. House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 45
Alexander Theodoridis (2012)
Party Identity in Political Cognition
Linda Fowler, Ronald Shaiko (1987)
The Grass Roots Connection: Environmental Activists and Senate Roll CallsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 31
D. Rucinski (1994)
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.Psyccritiques, 39
(2012)
Political Sorting in Social Relationships
J. Sekhon, W. Mebane (2011)
Genetic Optimization Using DerivativesPolitical Analysis, 7
M. Sherif (1956)
Experiments in Group ConflictNature, 179
Adam Berinsky, G. Huber, Gabriel Lenz (2012)
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical TurkPolitical Analysis, 20
S. Ansolabehere, Eitan Hersh (2012)
Validation: What Big Data Reveal About Survey Misreporting and the Real ElectoratePolitical Analysis, 20
D. Freedman (2008)
Statistical Models and Causal Inference: Randomization Does Not Justify Logistic Regression
J. Wright (1995)
Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions and Influence
Margo Monteith (1993)
Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65
(2014)
Why Partisans Don’t Sort: How Neighborhood Quality Concerns Limit Americans
L. Festinger, J. Carlsmith (2011)
Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.Journal of abnormal psychology, 58 2
Richard Fenno (1978)
Home Style : House Members in Their Districts
K. Miler (2010)
Constituency Representation in Congress: The View from Capitol Hill
M. Fiorina (1981)
Retrospective voting in American national elections
(2012)
Public Policy Polling
Joanne Miller, J. Krosnick (2004)
Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field ExperimentPolitical Psychology, 25
B. Jones, S. Greenberg, Clifford Kaufman, J. Drew (1977)
Bureaucratic Response to Citizen-Initiated Contacts: Environmental Enforcement in DetroitAmerican Political Science Review, 71
Lilliana Mason (2015)
“I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue PolarizationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 59
C. Gay (2002)
Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government
(1959)
Exploration.” American Political Science Review
David Broockman, Christopher Skovron (2014)
What Politicians Believe About Their Constituents: Asymmetric Misperceptions and Prospects for Constituency Control
Past work suggests that partisan attachments isolate citizens from encountering elite messages contrary to their points of view. Here, we present evidence that partisan attachments not only serve to filter the information citizens receive from political elites; they also work in the other direction, isolating politicians from encountering potentially contrary perspectives from citizens. In particular, we hypothesized that Americans prefer expressing their opinions to politicians who share their party identification and avoid contacting outpartisan politicians. Three studies—drawing on a mixture of observational, field experimental, and natural experimental approaches—support this hypothesis: Citizens prefer to “preach to the choir,” contacting legislators of the same partisan stripe. In light of evidence that contact from citizens powerfully affects politicians’ stances and priorities, these findings suggest a feedback loop that might aggravate political polarization and help explain how politicians of different parties could develop different perceptions of the same constituencies.
American Journal of Political Science – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.