Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Schaid, C. Rowland, David Tines, R. Jacobson, G. Poland (2002)
Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous.American journal of human genetics, 70 2
A. Saunders, A. Roses, M. Pericak-Vance, K. Dole, W. Strittmatter, D. Schmechel, M. Szymanski, N. McCown, M.G Manwaring, K. Schmader, J. Breitner, D. Goldgaber, M. Benson, L. Goldfarb, W.T Brown (1993)
Apolipoprotein E ∈4 allele distributions in late-onset Alzheimer's disease and in other amyloid-forming diseasesThe Lancet, 342
A. Clark (1990)
Inference of haplotypes from PCR-amplified samples of diploid populations.Molecular biology and evolution, 7 2
N. Schork (2002)
Power calculations for genetic association studies using estimated probability distributions.American journal of human genetics, 70 6
(1993)
Apolipoprotein E 4 allele distributions in late - onset Alzheimer ’ s disease and in other amyloidforming diseases
D. Schaid (2002)
Relative efficiency of ambiguous vs. directly measured haplotype frequenciesGenetic Epidemiology, 23
Hai-Yan Yan, N. Papadopoulos, G. Marra, C. Perrera, J. Jiricny, C. Boland, Henry Lynch, R. Chadwick, A. Chapelle, K. Berg, J. Eshleman, Weishi Yuan, S. Markowitz, S. Laken, C. Lengauer, K. Kinzler, B. Vogelstein (2000)
Conversion of diploidy to haploidyNature, 403
E. Corder, A. Saunders, W. Strittmatter, D. Schmechel, P. Gaskell, G. Small, A. Roses, J. Haines, M. Pericak-Vance (1993)
Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families.Science, 261 5123
(2002)
Relative efficiency of ambiguous vs
A. Dempster, N. Laird, D. Rubin (1977)
Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper
W. Hill (1974)
Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in randomly mating populationsHeredity, 33
J. Collins, Melanie Goward, C. Cole, L. Smink, E. Huckle, Sarah Knowles, J. Bye, D. Beare, I. Dunham (2003)
Reevaluating human gene annotation: a second-generation analysis of chromosome 22.Genome research, 13 1
D. Fallin, N. Schork, N. Schork (2000)
Accuracy of haplotype frequency estimation for biallelic loci, via the expectation-maximization algorithm for unphased diploid genotype data.American journal of human genetics, 67 4
J. Douglas, M. Boehnke, E. Gillanders, J. Trent, S. Gruber (2001)
Experimentally-derived haplotypes substantially increase the efficiency of linkage disequilibrium studiesNature Genetics, 28
B. Rannala, M. Slatkin (1998)
Likelihood analysis of disequilibrium mapping, and related problems.American journal of human genetics, 62 2
Sun-Wei Guo (1997)
Linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping: a comparison.Human heredity, 47 6
Sonia Michalatos-Beloin, Sarah Tishkoff, Kevin Bentley, Kenneth Kidd, Gualberto Ruano (1996)
Molecular haplotyping of genetic markers 10 kb apart by allele-specific long-range PCR.Nucleic acids research, 24 23
P. Sham (1997)
Statistics in human genetics
M. Stephens, N. Smith, P. Donnelly (2001)
A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data.American journal of human genetics, 68 4
L. Excoffier, M. Slatkin (1995)
Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population.Molecular biology and evolution, 12 5
Haplotype analysis is essential to studies of the genetic factors underlying human disease, but requires a large sample size of phase‐known data. Recently, directly haplotyping individuals was suggested as a means of maximizing the phase‐known data from a sample. Haplotyping, however, is much more labor‐intensive than indirectly inferring haplotypes from genotypes (genotyping). This study uses simulations to compare the power of each methodology to detect associations between a haplotype and a trait or disease locus under conditions of varying linkage disequilibrium. The relative power of haplotyping over genotyping in association studies increases with decreasing sample size, decreasing linkage disequilibrium, decreasing numbers of marker loci, and decreasing numbers of different haplotypes. In addition, the frequency of the haplotype of interest and the magnitude of its association with the disease affect the power. From a cost‐benefit standpoint, genotyping would be favored with large multiplicative risks (relative risk of haplotype >2.5). If case numbers are limiting rather than cost, haplotyping would maximize the information obtained. At small haplotype frequencies (e.g., <0.05), haplotyping is relatively more efficient, but there is little absolute power to detect associations under either methodology. Given the much larger laboratory resources required for direct haplotyping, genotyping would probably be favored under most conditions, but this must be balanced against the unit costs associated with recruitment and phenotyping. In the context of multipurpose, prospective cohort studies (e.g., the UK Biobank study), there may be a general value in establishing a series of directly haplotyped individuals to serve as controls for a number of alternative studies. Genet Epidemiol 26:116–124, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Genetic Epidemiology – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2004
Keywords: expectation‐maximization; haplotype; genotype; linkage disequilibrium; resource implications
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.