Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Fulvio Attinà (1990)
The voting behaviour of the European Parliament members and the problem of the EuropartiesEuropean Journal of Political Research, 18
Tapio Raunio (1997)
The European perspective : transnational party groups in the 1989-1994, European Parliament
Gabel Gabel, Hix Hix (2002)
Defining the EU Political Space: An Empirical Study of the European Elections Manifestos, 1979–1999Comparative Political Studies, 35
Herbert Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, J. Stephens (1999)
Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism
F. Baumgartner, B. Jones, M. Macleod (2000)
The Evolution of Legislative JurisdictionsThe Journal of Politics, 62
R. Inglehart, Scott Flanagan (1987)
Value Change in Industrial SocietiesAmerican Political Science Review, 81
M. Hinich, Michael Munger (1997)
Analytical politics: Frontmatter
A. Moravcsik (1998)
The choice for Europe
D. Olson, Michael Mezey (1991)
Legislatures in the policy process: Contents
L. Hooghe, G. Marks, Carole Wilson (2002)
Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?Comparative Political Studies, 35
G. Smith (1972)
Politics in Western Europe: A comparative analysis
B. Jones (1994)
Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy
Gordon Smith (1973)
Politics in Western Europe
R. Federman (1976)
Take it or leave it : an exaggerated second-hand tale to be read aloud either standing or sitting
Erik Berglöf, Mike Burkart (2003)
European Takeover RegulationCorporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law eJournal
M. Westlake, L. Brittan (1994)
A modern guide to the European Parliament
C. Mackenzie (1948)
All over the place
S. Hix, Abdul Noury, G. Roland (2005)
Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001British Journal of Political Science, 35
John Kingdon (1984)
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
S. Hix, Christopher Lord (1997)
Political Parties In The European Union
G. Marks, M. Steenbergen (2002)
Understanding Political Contestation in the European UnionComparative Political Studies, 35
Michael Cohen, J. March, Johan Olsen (1972)
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17
Martin Rhodes, B. Apeldoorn (1997)
Capitalism versus Capitalism in Western Europe
Abdul Noury (2002)
Ideology, Nationality and Euro-ParliamentariansEuropean Union Politics, 3
S. Hix (1999)
The Political System of the European Union
S. Hix (2002)
Parliamentary behaviour with two principals: preferences, parties, and voting in the European parliamentAmerican Journal of Political Science, 46
Berglöf Berglöf, Burkart Burkart (2003)
European Takeover RegulationEconomic Policy, 36
Marks Marks, Wilson Wilson (2000)
The Past in the Present: A Cleavage Theory of Party Positions on European IntegrationBritish Journal of Political Science, 30
M. Gabel, C. Anderson (2002)
The Structure of Citizen Attitudes and the European Political SpaceComparative Political Studies, 35
S. Bowler, D. Farrell (1995)
The Organizing of the European Parliament: Committees, Specialization and Co-ordinationBritish Journal of Political Science, 25
Graeme Orr, Gregory Dale (2009)
The political system
L. Hooghe, G. Marks (2001)
Multi-Level Governance and European Integration
M. Edelman (1989)
Constructing the political spectacle
M. Aspinwall (2002)
Preferring EuropeEuropean Union Politics, 3
G. Marks, Carole Wilson (2000)
The Past in the Present: A Cleavage Theory of Party Response to European IntegrationBritish Journal of Political Science, 30
S. Hix (1999)
Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responsesEuropean Journal of Political Research, 35
Skog Skog (2002)
The Takeover Directive—An Endless Saga?European Business Law Review, 13
L. Hooghe, G. Marks (1999)
Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism: The Making of a Polity: The Struggle over European Integration
M. Gabel, S. Hix (2002)
Defining the Eu Political SpaceComparative Political Studies, 35
Marks Marks, Steenbergen Steenbergen (2002)
Introduction: Understanding Political Contestation in the European UnionComparative Political Studies, 35
L. Hooghe, G. Marks (2002)
The Making of a Polity: The Struggle Over European Integration, 1
Morten Bennedsen, K. Nielsen (2002)
The Impact of a Break-Through Rule on European FirmsEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 17
Keith. Krehbiel (1991)
Information and legislative organization
Stone Stone (1989)
Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy AgendasPolitical Science Quarterly, 104
Aspinwall Aspinwall (2002)
Preferring Europe: Ideology and National Preferences on European IntegrationEuropean Union Politics, 3
Gary King, Michael Tomz, J. Wittenberg (2000)
Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and PresentationPSN: Computational Models (Games) (Topic)
B. Fligg (1984)
The art of manipulationJournal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 28
Abdul Noury, G. Roland (2002)
More power to the European ParliamentEconomic Policy, 17
S. Hix (2001)
Legislative Behaviour and Party Competition in the European Parliament: An Application of Nominate to the EUJournal of Common Market Studies, 39
G. Marks, Carole Wilson, Leonard Ray (2002)
National political parties and European integrationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 46
W. Riker (1990)
Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting: Heresthetic and Rhetoric in the Spatial Model
This article introduces a model of policy preference formation in legislative politics. Emphasizing a dynamic relationship between structure, agent, and decision‐making process, it ties the question of policy choice to the dimensionality of the normative and cognitive political space and the strategic actions of parliamentary agenda setters. The model proposes that structural factors, such as ideology, shape policy preferences to the extent that legislative actors successfully link them to specific policy proposals through the strategic provision of focal points. These ideas or images shift attention toward particular aspects of a legislative proposal, thus shaping the dominant interpretation of its content and consequences. This interpretation affects both individual‐level policy preferences and policy outcomes. The propositions of the focal‐point model are tested empirically in a detailed examination of European Union legislation on cross‐border takeover bids, using both qualitative and quantitative methods.
American Journal of Political Science – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.