Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/performance-appraisal-behaviors-supervisor-perceptions-and-subordinate-xEJ52RtO32
References (30)
-
Wayne Nemeroff, K. Wexley (1977)
Relationships Between Performance Feedback Interview Characteristics and Interview Outcomes as Perceived by Managers and Subordinates., 1977
-
D. Ilgen, T. Mitchell, J. Fredrickson (1981)
Poor performers: Supervisors' and subordinates' responsesOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27
-
T. Mitchell (1974)
Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal.Psychological Bulletin, 81
-
D. Ilgen, C. Fisher, M. Taylor (1979)
Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 64
-
D. Ilgen, R. Peterson, B. Martin, Daniel Boeschen (1981)
Supervisor and subordinate reactions to performance appraisal sessionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28
-
F. Landy, J. Barnes-Farrell, J. Cleveland (1980)
Perceived Fairness and Accuracy of Performance Evaluation: A Follow-Up.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65
-
T. Mitchell (1985)
An Evaluation of the Validity of Correlational Research Conducted in OrganizationsAcademy of Management Review, 10
-
P. Podsakoff, William Todor, Richard Skov (1982)
Effects of leader contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction.Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 25 4
-
M. Beer (1981)
Performance appraisal: dilemmas and possibilities.Organizational dynamics, 9 3
-
Charles Greene (1979)
Questions of Causation in the Path-Goal Theory of Leadership1Academy of Management Journal, 22
-
J.Bruce Prince, Edward Lawler (1986)
Does salary discussion hurt the developmental performance appraisalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37
-
R. Burke, William Weitzel, T. Weir (1978)
CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT INTERVIEWS: REPLICATION AND EXTENSIONPersonnel Psychology, 31
-
G. Latham, G. Yukl (1975)
A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in OrganizationsAcademy of Management Journal, 18
-
L. Cummings, D. Schwab (1978)
Designing Appraisal Systems for Information YieldCalifornia Management Review, 20
-
E. Lawler, Allan Mohrman, S. Resnick (1984)
Performance Appraisal RevisitedOrganizational Dynamics, 13
-
E. Locke, K. Shaw, L. Saari, G. Latham (1981)
Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980.Psychological Bulletin, 90
-
Marshall Sashkin (1981)
Appraising appraisal: Ten lessons from research for practiceOrganizational Dynamics, 9
-
Douglas Cederblom (1982)
The Performance Appraisal Interview: A Review, Implications, and SuggestionsJournal of Library Administration, 4
-
J. Terborg, G. Howard, S. Maxwell (1980)
Evaluating Planned Organizational Change: A Method for Assessing Alpha, Beta, and Gamma ChangeAcademy of Management Review, 5
-
R. Burke, D. Wilcox (1969)
CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT INTERVIEWSPersonnel Psychology, 22
-
B. Metcalfe (1984)
10 – Microskills of Leadership: A Detailed Analysis of the Behaviors of Managers in the Appraisal Interview -
J. Komaki, William Waddell, Montecinos Pearce (1977)
The applied behavior analysis approach and individual employees: Improving performance in two small businessesOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19
-
L. Cummings (1973)
A FIELD EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF TWO PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS1Personnel Psychology, 26
-
D. Dossett, G. Latham, T. Mitchell (1979)
Effects of assigned versus participatively set goals, knowledge of results, and individual differences on employee behavior when goal difficulty is held constant.Journal of Applied Psychology, 64
-
M. Greller (1975)
Subordinate participation and reactions to the appraisal interview.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60
-
D. Herold (1977)
Two-Way Influence Processes In Leader-Follower DyadsAcademy of Management Journal, 20
-
E. Kay, H. Meyer, J. French (1965)
Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview.The Journal of applied psychology, 49 5
-
BM. Bass (1981)
Stogdill's handbook of leadership -
A. Seers, G. Graen (1984)
The dual attachment concept: A longitudinal investigation of the combination of task characteristics and leader—member exchange☆Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33
-
F. Landy, J. Barnes, K. Murphy (1978)
Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1986 Wiley Subscription Services
- ISSN
- 0031-5826
- eISSN
- 1744-6570
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00954.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This study examined supervisor perceptions and subordinate reactions to formal performance‐appraisal reviews. The performance‐appraisal behaviors of supervisors and the reactions of their subordinates were studied in a sample of university employees. A factor analysis revealed that there were three dimensions of formal performance appraisals: two developmental dimensions (being supportive; emphasizing performance improvement) and one administrative dimension (discussing pay and advancement). Regression analyses suggested that supervisors supported highly rated individuals and stressed improvement efforts for poor performers. After controlling for the level of previous performance ratings, results indicated that support in the appraisal review was associated with higher levels of employee motivation, while discussing pay and advancement was associated with higher levels of employee satisfaction. Unfortunately, improvement efforts by the supervisors did not influence job performance one year later.
Journal
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1986