Pain begets pain. When marathon runners are not in pain anymore, they underestimate their memory of marathon pain––A mediation analysis

Pain begets pain. When marathon runners are not in pain anymore, they underestimate their memory... IntroductionThe memory of pain is consistently regarded as an important topic for research (Erskine et al., ; Niven and Murphy‐Black, ; von Baeyer et al., ; Noel et al., ). Although several studies have shown that pain may be remembered accurately (Lefebvre and Keefe, ; Bąbel, , , ; Hovasapian and Levine, ), there is also evidence indicating that people tend to overestimate (Gedney and Logan, , ; Broderick et al., ; McNeil et al., ) or underestimate it (Fors and Götestam, ; Eli et al., ; Rode et al., ; De Pascalis et al., ; Bąbel, ). Such inconsistency in the research findings inspires the search for the factors influencing the accuracy of remembering pain.It seems that the type and the meaning of pain experience may influence memory processes (Bąbel et al., ). Suffering in a situation that is perceived as positive and desirable may be remembered differently than pain associated with traumatic and poorly controllable events such as illness, injury or surgery. The research on memory of labour pain indicates that, in line with the intuitive assumptions, pain associated with positively valued experiences is underestimated rather than overestimated (Bennett, ; Lowe and Roberts, ; Norvell et al., ; Simkin, ; Waldenström, ; Waldenström and Schytt, ; for http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Pain Wiley

Pain begets pain. When marathon runners are not in pain anymore, they underestimate their memory of marathon pain––A mediation analysis

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/pain-begets-pain-when-marathon-runners-are-not-in-pain-anymore-they-wWnkSnMvtv
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC®
ISSN
1090-3801
eISSN
1532-2149
D.O.I.
10.1002/ejp.1166
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

IntroductionThe memory of pain is consistently regarded as an important topic for research (Erskine et al., ; Niven and Murphy‐Black, ; von Baeyer et al., ; Noel et al., ). Although several studies have shown that pain may be remembered accurately (Lefebvre and Keefe, ; Bąbel, , , ; Hovasapian and Levine, ), there is also evidence indicating that people tend to overestimate (Gedney and Logan, , ; Broderick et al., ; McNeil et al., ) or underestimate it (Fors and Götestam, ; Eli et al., ; Rode et al., ; De Pascalis et al., ; Bąbel, ). Such inconsistency in the research findings inspires the search for the factors influencing the accuracy of remembering pain.It seems that the type and the meaning of pain experience may influence memory processes (Bąbel et al., ). Suffering in a situation that is perceived as positive and desirable may be remembered differently than pain associated with traumatic and poorly controllable events such as illness, injury or surgery. The research on memory of labour pain indicates that, in line with the intuitive assumptions, pain associated with positively valued experiences is underestimated rather than overestimated (Bennett, ; Lowe and Roberts, ; Norvell et al., ; Simkin, ; Waldenström, ; Waldenström and Schytt, ; for

Journal

European Journal of PainWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off