Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research

Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research Introduction Mascia et al.'s (2003) call for increased interdisciplinary approaches to conservation and Thornhill's (2003) response detailing activities of the Society for Conservation Biology reflect an evolution in thinking about environmental problems. We have moved beyond Hilborn and Ludwig's (1993) call to consider the human context of such problems to addressing them in an interdisciplinary manner and training researchers to do this ( Zarin et al. 2003 ). I fully support efforts to make conservation research, work, and training more interdisciplinary. I believe interdisciplinary approaches are critical for successful conservation and find collaborations personally and professionally rewarding ( Campbell 2003 ). Participants approaching an interdisciplinary collaboration for the first time, however, must recognize potential obstacles from the outset, not the least of which are “obstructive misconceptions or prejudices [that social and natural scientists have] about each other” ( Redclift 1998 :179). I have written about the challenges of doing social science research in the biologist‐dominated field of sea turtle conservation ( Campbell 2003 ). Here, I outline some practical and philosophical obstacles to interdisciplinary research in general, offer illustrative examples from my own experience, and make some suggestions for overcoming them. Many suggestions are directed at conservation biologists, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Conservation Biology Wiley

Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research

Conservation Biology, Volume 19 (2) – Apr 1, 2005

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/overcoming-obstacles-to-interdisciplinary-research-so3n3z1jfE
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0888-8892
eISSN
1523-1739
D.O.I.
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00058.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Introduction Mascia et al.'s (2003) call for increased interdisciplinary approaches to conservation and Thornhill's (2003) response detailing activities of the Society for Conservation Biology reflect an evolution in thinking about environmental problems. We have moved beyond Hilborn and Ludwig's (1993) call to consider the human context of such problems to addressing them in an interdisciplinary manner and training researchers to do this ( Zarin et al. 2003 ). I fully support efforts to make conservation research, work, and training more interdisciplinary. I believe interdisciplinary approaches are critical for successful conservation and find collaborations personally and professionally rewarding ( Campbell 2003 ). Participants approaching an interdisciplinary collaboration for the first time, however, must recognize potential obstacles from the outset, not the least of which are “obstructive misconceptions or prejudices [that social and natural scientists have] about each other” ( Redclift 1998 :179). I have written about the challenges of doing social science research in the biologist‐dominated field of sea turtle conservation ( Campbell 2003 ). Here, I outline some practical and philosophical obstacles to interdisciplinary research in general, offer illustrative examples from my own experience, and make some suggestions for overcoming them. Many suggestions are directed at conservation biologists,

Journal

Conservation BiologyWiley

Published: Apr 1, 2005

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off