Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics

Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics Summary 1 Better tools are needed to predict population connectivity in complex landscapes. ‘Least‐cost modelling’ is one commonly employed approach in which dispersal costs are assigned to distinct habitat types and the least‐costly dispersal paths among habitat patches are calculated using a geographical information system (GIS). Because adequate data on dispersal are usually lacking, dispersal costs are often assigned solely from expert opinion. Spatially explicit, high‐resolution genetic data may be used to infer variation in animal movements. We employ such an approach to estimate habitat‐specific migration rates and to develop least‐cost connectivity models for desert bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis nelsoni. 2 Bighorn sheep dispersal is thought to be affected by distance and topography. We incorporated both factors into least‐cost GIS models with different parameter values and estimated effective geographical distances among 26 populations. We assessed which model was correlated most strongly with gene flow estimates among those populations, while controlling for the effect of anthropogenic barriers. We used the best‐fitting model to (i) determine whether migration rates are higher over sloped terrain than flat terrain; (ii) predict probable movement corridors; (iii) predict which populations are connected by migration; and (iv) investigate how anthropogenic barriers and translocated populations have affected landscape connectivity. 3 Migration models were correlated most strongly with migration when areas of at least 10% slope had 1/10th the cost of areas of lower slope; thus, gene flow occurred over longer distances when ‘escape terrain’ was available. Optimal parameter values were consistent across two measures of gene flow and three methods for defining population polygons. 4 Anthropogenic barriers disrupted numerous corridors predicted to be high‐use dispersal routes, indicating priority areas for mitigation. However, population translocations have restored high‐use dispersal routes in several other areas. Known intermountain movements of bighorn sheep were largely consistent with predicted corridors. 5 Synthesis and applications. Population genetic data provided sufficient resolution to infer how landscape features influenced the behaviour of dispersing desert bighorn sheep. Anthropogenic barriers that block high‐use dispersal corridors should be mitigated, but population translocations may help maintain connectivity. We conclude that developing least‐cost models from similar empirical data could significantly improve the utility of these tools. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Ecology Wiley

Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/optimizing-dispersal-and-corridor-models-using-landscape-genetics-OHAC0L7bvE
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0021-8901
eISSN
1365-2664
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01325.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary 1 Better tools are needed to predict population connectivity in complex landscapes. ‘Least‐cost modelling’ is one commonly employed approach in which dispersal costs are assigned to distinct habitat types and the least‐costly dispersal paths among habitat patches are calculated using a geographical information system (GIS). Because adequate data on dispersal are usually lacking, dispersal costs are often assigned solely from expert opinion. Spatially explicit, high‐resolution genetic data may be used to infer variation in animal movements. We employ such an approach to estimate habitat‐specific migration rates and to develop least‐cost connectivity models for desert bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis nelsoni. 2 Bighorn sheep dispersal is thought to be affected by distance and topography. We incorporated both factors into least‐cost GIS models with different parameter values and estimated effective geographical distances among 26 populations. We assessed which model was correlated most strongly with gene flow estimates among those populations, while controlling for the effect of anthropogenic barriers. We used the best‐fitting model to (i) determine whether migration rates are higher over sloped terrain than flat terrain; (ii) predict probable movement corridors; (iii) predict which populations are connected by migration; and (iv) investigate how anthropogenic barriers and translocated populations have affected landscape connectivity. 3 Migration models were correlated most strongly with migration when areas of at least 10% slope had 1/10th the cost of areas of lower slope; thus, gene flow occurred over longer distances when ‘escape terrain’ was available. Optimal parameter values were consistent across two measures of gene flow and three methods for defining population polygons. 4 Anthropogenic barriers disrupted numerous corridors predicted to be high‐use dispersal routes, indicating priority areas for mitigation. However, population translocations have restored high‐use dispersal routes in several other areas. Known intermountain movements of bighorn sheep were largely consistent with predicted corridors. 5 Synthesis and applications. Population genetic data provided sufficient resolution to infer how landscape features influenced the behaviour of dispersing desert bighorn sheep. Anthropogenic barriers that block high‐use dispersal corridors should be mitigated, but population translocations may help maintain connectivity. We conclude that developing least‐cost models from similar empirical data could significantly improve the utility of these tools.

Journal

Journal of Applied EcologyWiley

Published: Aug 1, 2007

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off