Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Jarrett (1984)
Hydraulics of High-Gradient StreamsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110
Blench Blench (1951)
Regime theory for self‐formed sediment bearing channelsTrans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 117
(1983)
Sediment transport on steep slopes (in German), Mitt. der Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrol. und Glaziol
J. Limerinos (1970)
Determination of the manning coefficient from measured bed roughness in natural channels
V. Ponce (1986)
Diffusion Wave Modeling of Catchment DynamicsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 112
W. Osterkamp, E. Hedman (1977)
Variation of width and discharge for natural high‐gradient stream channelsWater Resources Research, 13
G. Keulegan (1938)
Laws of turbulent flow in open channelsJournal of research of the National Bureau of Standards, 21
Hey Hey (1979)
Flow resistance in gravel‐bed riversJ. Hydraul. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 105
(1963)
Friction factors in open channels
R. Kennedy
THE PREVENTION OF SILTING IN IRRIGATION CANALS. (INCLUDING APPENDIX)., 119
A. Howard (1994)
A detachment-limited model of drainage basin evolutionWater Resources Research, 30
Kennedy Kennedy (1895)
The prevention of silting in irrigation canalsProc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 119
V. Ponce, V. Yevjevich (1978)
Muskingum-Cunge Method with Variable ParametersJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 104
Ponce Ponce, Yevjevich Yevjevich (1978)
Muskingum‐Cunge method with variable parametersJ. Hydraul. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 104
Ibbitt Ibbitt, Willgoose Willgoose, Duncan Duncan (1999)
Channel network simulation models compared with data from the Ashley RiverWater Resour. Res., 35
(1993)
Flow routing and the hydrological response of channel networks, in Channel Network Hydrology, edited by K
R. Ibbitt, G. Willgoose, M. Duncan (1999)
Channel network simulation models compared with data from the Ashley River, New ZealandWater Resources Research, 35
N. Clifford (1996)
Classics in physical geography revisitedProgress in Physical Geography, 20
L. Leopold, John Miller (1956)
Ephemeral streams; hydraulic factors and their relation to the drainage net
S. Orlandini, R. Rosso (1996)
Diffusion Wave Modeling of Distributed Catchment DynamicsJournal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1
A. Strickler (1981)
Contributions to the Question of a Velocity Formula and Roughness Data for Streams, Channels and Closed Pipelines
R. Jarrett (1990)
HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC RESEARCH IN MOUNTAIN RWERSJournal of The American Water Resources Association, 26
Kellerhals Kellerhals (1970)
Runoff routing through steep natural channelsJ. Hydraul. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 96
J. Bathurst (1985)
Flow Resistance Estimation in Mountain RiversJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 111
R. Hey (1979)
Flow Resistance in Gravel-Bed RiversJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 105
(1982)
Theoretical aspects of flow resistance
A. Mckerchar, R. Ibbitt, S. Brown, M. Duncan (1998)
Data for Ashley River to test channel network and river basin heterogeneity conceptsWater Resources Research, 34
J. Bathurst (1986)
Physically-based distributed modelling of an upland catchment using the Systeme Hydrologique EuropeenJournal of Hydrology, 87
R. Kellerhals (1970)
RUNOFF ROUTING THROUGH STEEP NATURAL CHANNELSJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 96
H. Barnes (1967)
Roughness characteristics of natural channels
A. Parsons, A. Abrahams, J. Wainwright (1994)
On determining resistance to interrill overland flowWater Resources Research, 30
R. Henderson, R. Ibbitt, M. Duncan (1999)
Cropp river: data to test concepts of channel network and river basin heterogeneity : Data noteJournal of hydrology. New Zealand, 38
L. Band (1986)
Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation ModelsWater Resources Research, 22
Jarrett Jarrett (1990)
Hydrologic and hydraulic research in mountain riversWater Resour. Bull., 26
R. Ibbitt (1997)
Evaluation of optimal channel network and river basin heterogeneity concepts using measured flow and channel propertiesJournal of Hydrology, 196
A. Howard (1990)
Role of hypsometry and planform in basin hydrologic responseHydrological Processes, 4
(1929)
Stable channels in alluvium
E. Laursen, G. Matthes (1952)
Discussion of "Regime Theory for Self-Formed Sediment-Bearing Channels"Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 117
J. Cunge (1969)
On The Subject Of A Flood Propagation Computation Method (Musklngum Method)Journal of Hydraulic Research, 7
J. O'Callaghan, D. Mark (1984)
The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation dataComput. Vis. Graph. Image Process., 28
L. Leopold, T. Maddock (1953)
The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications
Keulegan Keulegan (1938)
Laws of turbulent flow in open channelsJ. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. U.S., 21
D. Tarboton (1997)
A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation modelsWater Resources Research, 33
S. Orlandini, R. Rosso (1998)
Parameterization of stream channel geometry in the distributed modeling of catchment dynamicsWater Resources Research, 34
(1983)
Hydraulics of steep, mobile-bed channels, paper presented at 20th Conference of International Association of Hydraulic Research
Shōitirō Hayami (1951)
On the Propagation of Flood Waves, 1
N. Kottegoda, R. Rosso (1997)
Statistics, Probability and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers
Detailed field measurements of channel properties and flow characteristics collected in the Ashley and Cropp catchments (New Zealand) are used to investigate the spatial variation of resistance to flow across upland channel networks. The application of the Darcy‐Weisbach equation and semilogarithmic flow resistance relationships reveals that mean flow velocities calculated from local measurements of bed material particle size, hydraulic depth, and channel bed slope may be inaccurate. The Manning‐Gauckler‐Strickler equation with resistance coefficient independent of bed material particle size is found to be relatively more reliable but not sufficiently general to reproduce the spatial variation of resistance to flow across a complex channel network. A new methodology is developed by combining a hydraulic equation of the Manning‐Gauckler‐Strickler type, a flow discharge‐upstream drainage area relationship, and geomorphological fluvial relationships for mean flow velocity, Gauckler‐Strickler resistance coefficient, hydraulic depth, and friction slope. This methodology is found to improve the reproduction of the spatial variation of mean flow velocity across the Ashley catchment and appears of general applicability for the parameterization of resistance to flow in distributed catchment models.
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.