On the relationship between the reliability of parameter estimates and hydrologic time series data used in calibration

On the relationship between the reliability of parameter estimates and hydrologic time series... Typically, some of the parameters of conceptual hydrologic models are calibrated using limited hydrologic information, namely, input‐output time series data such as precipitation and streamflow. The first part of this paper examines the sources of stochasticity in these models and then explores the conditions under which parameter estimates are consistent when only input‐output hydrologic time series data are used in calibration. This complements other work done on the stability of parameter estimates. Because the conditions for consistency are stringent, two ways of redressing this situation and also improving the stability of parameter estimates are considered in the second part. Two levels of additional information are considered. The first considers the use of the first two moments of measurement errors to make large sample bias corrections. The second employs time series data corresponding to storage volumes such as groundwater and soil moisture to remove the source of inconsistency due to inferring erroneously unobserved storage volumes and to improve the stability of parameter estimates. Proper use of such information must exploit the interdependence in model equations arising from coupled model structure and correlated disturbances. It is suggested that generalized least squares offers a promising approach for efficiently exploiting all available time series information in model calibration. Finally, a simple hydrologic example is given to illustrate the relationship between estimator reliability and time series data used in calibration. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Water Resources Research Wiley

On the relationship between the reliability of parameter estimates and hydrologic time series data used in calibration

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/on-the-relationship-between-the-reliability-of-parameter-estimates-and-84DUGwVC20
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Typically, some of the parameters of conceptual hydrologic models are calibrated using limited hydrologic information, namely, input‐output time series data such as precipitation and streamflow. The first part of this paper examines the sources of stochasticity in these models and then explores the conditions under which parameter estimates are consistent when only input‐output hydrologic time series data are used in calibration. This complements other work done on the stability of parameter estimates. Because the conditions for consistency are stringent, two ways of redressing this situation and also improving the stability of parameter estimates are considered in the second part. Two levels of additional information are considered. The first considers the use of the first two moments of measurement errors to make large sample bias corrections. The second employs time series data corresponding to storage volumes such as groundwater and soil moisture to remove the source of inconsistency due to inferring erroneously unobserved storage volumes and to improve the stability of parameter estimates. Proper use of such information must exploit the interdependence in model equations arising from coupled model structure and correlated disturbances. It is suggested that generalized least squares offers a promising approach for efficiently exploiting all available time series information in model calibration. Finally, a simple hydrologic example is given to illustrate the relationship between estimator reliability and time series data used in calibration.

Journal

Water Resources ResearchWiley

Published: Feb 1, 1982

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off