This study compares published cartometric and photogrammetric digital elevation models (DEMs) of various grid spacings with a ground truth data set, obtained by ground survey, and studies the implications of these differences on key hydrologic statistics. Inferred catchment sizes and stream networks from published DEMs were found to be significantly different than those from the ground truth in most instances. Furthermore, the width functions and cumulative area relationships determined from the published DEMs were found to fall consistently outside the 90% confidence limits determined from the ground truth for more than 60% of the relationship, suggesting that these hydrologic properties are poorly estimated from published DEMs. However, the slope‐area relationships determined from published DEMs were found to be less sensitive to catchment shape, size, and stream network, with the relationship falling outside the 90% confidence limits for less than 40% of the relationship for all catchments identified from the published DEMs. A published relationship linking the horizontal resolution with the vertical accuracy of the DEM was tested, predicting a horizontal resolution of about 10 m for the published DEMs tested.
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 1999
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera