On rate of increase ( r ): patterns of variation in Australian mammals and the implications for wildlife management

On rate of increase ( r ): patterns of variation in Australian mammals and the implications for... Summary 1. The annual rate of increase of a wildlife population is the change in abundance or density from one year to the next. This paper compares the expected and observed means and frequency distributions of annual instantaneous rates of increase (r) for unmanipulated field populations of the European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, red fox Vulpes vulpes and house mouse Mus domesticus in Australia. 2. The observed mean r was not significantly different from zero, the expected value, for each species, and the observed frequency distributions were not significantly different from the expected normal distributions. 3. The observed distributions were used to estimate the threshold proportions of pests that need to be killed, harvested or sterilized to stop population growth. To stop maximum population growth, as can occur after large population reductions, the proportion to kill, harvest or sterilize ranged from 0·65 year–1 for foxes to 0·97 year–1 for house mice. It is recommended that the estimates are tested experimentally. 4. The estimated proportions of pests to control were compared with extensive field data detailing attempts to control the pests. Estimated required levels of fox control were often less than observed levels of control. The required levels of rabbit and house mouse control could be higher than observed levels. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Ecology Wiley

On rate of increase ( r ): patterns of variation in Australian mammals and the implications for wildlife management

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/on-rate-of-increase-r-patterns-of-variation-in-australian-mammals-and-1HzsUgBhYY
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary 1. The annual rate of increase of a wildlife population is the change in abundance or density from one year to the next. This paper compares the expected and observed means and frequency distributions of annual instantaneous rates of increase (r) for unmanipulated field populations of the European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, red fox Vulpes vulpes and house mouse Mus domesticus in Australia. 2. The observed mean r was not significantly different from zero, the expected value, for each species, and the observed frequency distributions were not significantly different from the expected normal distributions. 3. The observed distributions were used to estimate the threshold proportions of pests that need to be killed, harvested or sterilized to stop population growth. To stop maximum population growth, as can occur after large population reductions, the proportion to kill, harvest or sterilize ranged from 0·65 year–1 for foxes to 0·97 year–1 for house mice. It is recommended that the estimates are tested experimentally. 4. The estimated proportions of pests to control were compared with extensive field data detailing attempts to control the pests. Estimated required levels of fox control were often less than observed levels of control. The required levels of rabbit and house mouse control could be higher than observed levels.

Journal

Journal of Applied EcologyWiley

Published: Oct 1, 1999

References

  • Rate of increase.
    Caughley, Caughley; Birch, Birch

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off