1. The muscarinic inhibitory post‐synaptic potential (i.p.s.p.) in sympathetic C neurones has been characterized in an isolated preparation of bullfrog paravertebral chain ganglia. Interactions between the i.p.s.p. and two other synaptic potentials have also been examined. 2. A single presynaptic stimulus to a C cell produces a nicotinic excitatory post‐synaptic potential (e.p.s.p.) followed by a muscarine i.p.s.p. The latency of the i.p.s.p. is 50 msec or longer and the response lasts for seconds. C cells receive multiple cholinergic innervation but the thresholds for activation of the e.p.s.p. and i.p.s.p. are inseparable. Trains of 50 or more presynaptic stimuli produce a non‐cholinergic e.p.s.p. which follows the nicotinic e.p.s.p. and i.p.s.p. and which lasts for tens of seconds. 3. The i.p.s.p. produced by a single presynaptic stimulus can be 30 mV in amplitude. However, in most cells, a short train of stimuli applied at an optimal frequency of 10 Hz is required to produce a large i.p.s.p. 4. The i.p.s.p. is blocked by atropine but is not affected by catecholamine antagonists. 5. Ionophoretically applied acetylcholine (ACh) mimics the i.p.s.p. in its latency, time course and amplitude. In addition, the i.p.s.p. and the muscarinic response to ACh reverse polarity at the same membrane potential: ‐102 mV in normal Ringer solution. The i.p.s.p. reversal potential shifts by 55 mV/decade change in extracellular K+ concentration and is insensitive to the Cl‐ gradient. 300 microM‐Ba2+ totally blocks the muscarinically activated conductance in a reversible manner. 6. Action potentials, when initiated by a supramaximal nicotinic e.p.s.p. or by an antidromic impulse, are not blocked by the i.p.s.p. 7. Near resting potential (‐50 to ‐60 mV), C cells can fire repetitively. The non‐cholinergic slow e.p.s.p. is often accompanied by oscillations in membrane potential and firing of action potentials. This repetitive firing of C cells, which appears to be enhanced by the non‐cholinergic e.p.s.p., is strongly inhibited by the i.p.s.p. The inhibition can be mimicked by injection of very small hyperpolarizing currents (e.g. 25 pA). Interactions between the i.p.s.p. and the non‐cholinergic e.p.s.p. can generate phasic bursting patterns in C cells. 8. The mechanism underlying the i.p.s.p. and the consequences of these findings for ganglionic integration are discussed.
The Journal of Physiology – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1983
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera