Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Gruber (1996)
Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual FundsJournal of Finance, 51
Randolph Cohen, Christopher Polk (1996)
An Investigation of the Impact of Industry Factors in Asset-Pricing Tests
E. Fama, K. French (1993)
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 33
E. Fama, K. French (1992)
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 47
D. Ikenberry, Josef Lakonishok, Theo Vermaelen (1994)
Market Underreaction to Open Market Share RepurchasesCapital Markets: Market Efficiency
M. Jensen (1967)
The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964Harvard Business School: Negotiation
Mark Grinblatt, S. Titman, Russ Wermers (1994)
Momentum Investment Strategies, Portfolio Performance, and Herding: A Study of Mutual Fund BehaviorThe American Economic Review, 85
Jegadeesh Jegadeesh (1990)
Evidence of predictable behavior in security pricesJournal of Finance, 45
Mark Grinblatt, S. Titman (1989)
Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio HoldingsThe Journal of Business, 62
Daniel Daniel, Sheridan Sheridan (1997)
Evidence on the characteristics of cross‐sectional variation in common stock returnsJournal of Finance, 52
Goetzmann Goetzmann, Roger Roger (1994)
Do winners repeat: Predicting mutual fund performanceThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 20
Philip Dybvig, S. Ross (1985)
Differential Information and Performance Measurement Using a Security Market LineJournal of Finance, 40
Stephen Brown, W. Goetzmann, R. Ibbotson, S. Ross (1992)
Survivorship Bias in Performance StudiesReview of Financial Studies, 5
Sanford Grossman (1980)
On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient MarketsERN: Efficient Market Hypothesis Models (Topic)
D. Hendricks, Jayen Patel, R. Zeckhauser (1993)
Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short‐Run Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974–1988Journal of Finance, 48
B. Malkiel (1995)
Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991Journal of Finance, 50
W. Goetzmann, R. Ibbotson (1994)
Do Winners Repeat?, 20
Mark Carhart (1997)
On Persistence in Mutual Fund PerformanceJournal of Finance, 52
E. Fama, K. French (1996)
Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing AnomaliesJournal of Finance, 51
Narasimhan Jegadeesh, S. Titman (1993)
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market EfficiencyJournal of Finance, 48
Narasimhan Jegadeesh (1990)
Evidence of Predictable Behavior of Security ReturnsJournal of Finance, 45
Ikenberry Ikenberry, Josef Josef, Theo Theo (1995)
Market underreaction to open market share repurchasesJournal of Financial Economics, 39
Kent Daniel, S. Titman (1996)
Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock ReturnsNBER Working Paper Series
Mark Grinblatt, S. Titman (1989)
Portfolio Performance Evaluation: Old Issues and New InsightsReview of Financial Studies, 2
E. Fama, K. French (1997)
Industry costs of equityJournal of Financial Economics, 43
Mark Grinblatt, S. Titman (1992)
The Persistence of Mutual Fund PerformanceJournal of Finance, 47
W. Ferson, Rudi Schadt (1996)
Measuring Fund Strategy and Performance in Changing Economic ConditionsJournal of Finance, 51
Mark Grinblatt, S. Titman (1993)
Performance Measurement without Benchmarks: An Examination of Mutual Fund ReturnsThe Journal of Business, 66
ABSTRACT This article develops and applies new measures of portfolio performance which use benchmarks based on the characteristics of stocks held by the portfolios that are evaluated. Specifically, the benchmarks are constructed from the returns of 125 passive portfolios that are matched with stocks held in the evaluated portfolio on the basis of the market capitalization, book‐to‐market, and prior‐year return characteristics of those stocks. Based on these benchmarks, “Characteristic Timing” and “Characteristic Selectivity” measures are developed that detect, respectively, whether portfolio managers successfully time their portfolio weightings on these characteristics and whether managers can select stocks that outperform the average stock having the same characteristics. We apply these measures to a new database of mutual fund holdings covering over 2500 equity funds from 1975 to 1994. Our results show that mutual funds, particularly aggressive‐growth funds, exhibit some selectivity ability, but that funds exhibit no characteristic timing ability.
The Journal of Finance – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.