Mark Dsouza, Rationale‐Based Defences in Criminal Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017, xx + 216 pp, hb £65.00.

Mark Dsouza, Rationale‐Based Defences in Criminal Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017, xx + 216... Criminal law, many claim, makes blaming judgments. If this is correct, the ethics of blame cannot but be part of criminal law theory. Imagine A is considering whether to blame B for X. Two questions arise:(1)Is B blameworthy for X?(2)Is A in a position to do the blaming?Let X be refusing to help a friend move house. Let B be the refuser. If B refuses because she is too lazy to help, B is blameworthy for X. It does not follow that everyone is in a position to blame B: if A is a stranger, B's refusal may be none of A's business. We should then answer yes to (1), and no to (2). Things are different if A is the friend B refused: all else being equal, she is in a position to blame B. But if B refuses because she is attending her grandmother's funeral, B is not blameworthy. We should answer yes to (2), but no to (1).Justifications and excuses are generally thought to bear on the answer to (1). Those who have one or the other are not blameworthy, and this is a strong reason not to blame them. That reason helps explain why justificatory http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Modern Law Review Wiley

Mark Dsouza, Rationale‐Based Defences in Criminal Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017, xx + 216 pp, hb £65.00.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/mark-dsouza-rationale-based-defences-in-criminal-law-oxford-hart-rJaFHRG9tt
Publisher
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Copyright
© 2018 The Modern Law Review Limited. All rights reserved
ISSN
0026-7961
eISSN
1468-2230
D.O.I.
10.1111/1468-2230.12337
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Criminal law, many claim, makes blaming judgments. If this is correct, the ethics of blame cannot but be part of criminal law theory. Imagine A is considering whether to blame B for X. Two questions arise:(1)Is B blameworthy for X?(2)Is A in a position to do the blaming?Let X be refusing to help a friend move house. Let B be the refuser. If B refuses because she is too lazy to help, B is blameworthy for X. It does not follow that everyone is in a position to blame B: if A is a stranger, B's refusal may be none of A's business. We should then answer yes to (1), and no to (2). Things are different if A is the friend B refused: all else being equal, she is in a position to blame B. But if B refuses because she is attending her grandmother's funeral, B is not blameworthy. We should answer yes to (2), but no to (1).Justifications and excuses are generally thought to bear on the answer to (1). Those who have one or the other are not blameworthy, and this is a strong reason not to blame them. That reason helps explain why justificatory

Journal

The Modern Law ReviewWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial