The transfusion records of 189 patients with acute leukemia were analyzed to correlate lymphocytotoxic antibody (LCTAb) levels with response to a series of random‐donor platelet transfusions (Tx). Twenty‐one patients were studied twice at times of different LCTAb levels. All transfusions were given when patients were clinically stable without disseminated intravascular coagulation, bleeding, temperature > 101°F, or splenomegaly. The mean 1‐hr and 24‐hr corrected count increments (CCI) for all patients with negative LCTAb were 16,100 and 12,000, and values for patients with positive LCTAb were 5,600 and 2,600 (P < 0.0005). Thirteen patients had intermediate LCTAb (10–20%) and a variable response to Tx. Of the 137 patients with negative LCTAb levels 106 (77%) had good mean CCI of > 10,000 at 1 hr and > 7,500 at 24 hr following transfusion. In contrast of 60 patients with positive LCTAb (> 20% cytotoxicity), 53 (88%) had poor CCI of < 10,000 at 1 hr and < 7,500 at 24 hr after transfusion. Only 4 patients with positive LCTAb had a good response to random donor platelets at both 1 and 24 hrs. Eighteen patients had negative LCTAb with a high 1‐hr and low 24‐hr CCI. Thirteen of these had a history of positive LCTAb and in 9 there was an anamnestic rise following transfusion. Nine of 137 patients had negative LCTAb with low 1‐hr and 24‐hr CCI. LCTAb is highly predictive of response to random donor platelets. Cytotoxicity to > 20% of tested lymphocytes virtually precludes a good CCI at 1 and 24 hr.
American Journal of Hematology – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 1983
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera