The debate between Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt in the context of the Weimar constitution chases the ‘big game’ of constitutional theory: The legitimacy of constitutional adjudication; the nature, role, and proper scope of executive power; the proper institution to protect fundamental constitutional principles; the interaction between domestic and international legal orders; the nature and location of sovereignty within an organised polity; the definition and delineation of political community; the dynamics of a federal system; and the limits on majoritarian democracy. Lars Vinx's presentation of the debate is structured around the so‐called Preussenschlag of 1932—Chancellor Franz von Papen's use of emergency powers, granted by President Paul von Hindenburg under the infamous Article 48, to wrest control of the Prussian state apparatus in the wake of factional violence in Altona (by Hamburg). The Preussenschlag was not just a key event in the disintegration of the Weimar Republic; it also ‘marked the culmination of two of the most important jurisprudential debates that took place in the Weimar era: the discussion on the nature and limits of executive powers of emergency under Article 48 and the debate on the legitimacy and desirability of constitutional adjudication’ (5).Schmitt and Kelsen approach these questions from
The Modern Law Review – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera