Lars Vinx, The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, ix + 296pp, hb £67.00.

Lars Vinx, The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of... The debate between Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt in the context of the Weimar constitution chases the ‘big game’ of constitutional theory: The legitimacy of constitutional adjudication; the nature, role, and proper scope of executive power; the proper institution to protect fundamental constitutional principles; the interaction between domestic and international legal orders; the nature and location of sovereignty within an organised polity; the definition and delineation of political community; the dynamics of a federal system; and the limits on majoritarian democracy. Lars Vinx's presentation of the debate is structured around the so‐called Preussenschlag of 1932—Chancellor Franz von Papen's use of emergency powers, granted by President Paul von Hindenburg under the infamous Article 48, to wrest control of the Prussian state apparatus in the wake of factional violence in Altona (by Hamburg). The Preussenschlag was not just a key event in the disintegration of the Weimar Republic; it also ‘marked the culmination of two of the most important jurisprudential debates that took place in the Weimar era: the discussion on the nature and limits of executive powers of emergency under Article 48 and the debate on the legitimacy and desirability of constitutional adjudication’ (5).Schmitt and Kelsen approach these questions from http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Modern Law Review Wiley

Lars Vinx, The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, ix + 296pp, hb £67.00.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/lars-vinx-the-guardian-of-the-constitution-hans-kelsen-and-carl-vf2V3xVIsL
Publisher
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Copyright
© 2018 The Modern Law Review Limited. All rights reserved
ISSN
0026-7961
eISSN
1468-2230
D.O.I.
10.1111/1468-2230.12324
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The debate between Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt in the context of the Weimar constitution chases the ‘big game’ of constitutional theory: The legitimacy of constitutional adjudication; the nature, role, and proper scope of executive power; the proper institution to protect fundamental constitutional principles; the interaction between domestic and international legal orders; the nature and location of sovereignty within an organised polity; the definition and delineation of political community; the dynamics of a federal system; and the limits on majoritarian democracy. Lars Vinx's presentation of the debate is structured around the so‐called Preussenschlag of 1932—Chancellor Franz von Papen's use of emergency powers, granted by President Paul von Hindenburg under the infamous Article 48, to wrest control of the Prussian state apparatus in the wake of factional violence in Altona (by Hamburg). The Preussenschlag was not just a key event in the disintegration of the Weimar Republic; it also ‘marked the culmination of two of the most important jurisprudential debates that took place in the Weimar era: the discussion on the nature and limits of executive powers of emergency under Article 48 and the debate on the legitimacy and desirability of constitutional adjudication’ (5).Schmitt and Kelsen approach these questions from

Journal

The Modern Law ReviewWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off