Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Merry (2011)
Measuring the WorldCurrent Anthropology, 52
Macharia Kamau, P. Chasek, David O’Connor (2018)
Transforming multilateral diplomacy
Interview with national delegate
A. Broome, Joel Quirk (2015)
Governing the world at a distance: the practice of global benchmarkingReview of International Studies, 41
H. Barger (1936)
The General Theory of Employment, Interest and MoneyNature, 137
S. Merry (2011)
Measuring the World Indicators, Human Rights, and Global GovernanceCurrent Anthropology, 52
S. Fukuda‐Parr (2016)
From the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for developmentGender & Development, 24
S. Fukuda‐Parr, A. Yamin (2017)
The MDGs, capabilities and human rights : the power of numbers to shape agendas
S. Fukuda‐Parr (2014)
Global Goals as a Policy Tool: Intended and Unintended ConsequencesJournal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15
J. Kelley, B. Simmons (2015)
Politics by number: indicators as social pressure in international relationsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 59
There was one minor modification that was made without open debate
(2002)
`From Santiago to Seattle
(2013)
A Million Voices: The World We Want
K. Davis, B. Kingsbury, S. Merry (2012)
Introduction: Global Governance by Indicators
K. Davis, B. Kingsbury, A. Fisher, S. E. Merry (2012)
Governance by Indicators
S. Fukuda‐Parr, A. Yamin, Joshua Greenstein (2014)
The Power of Numbers: A Critical Review of Millennium Development Goal Targets for Human Development and Human RightsJournal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15
W. Filho (2013)
Report on the Post-2015 Development Agenda – “a new global partnership: eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable developmentInternational Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15
H. Hansen, T. Porter (2012)
What Do Numbers Do in Transnational GovernanceInternational Political Sociology, 6
Fulfilling Social and Economic Rights (with T. Lawson-Remer and S
Macharia Kamau, P. Chasek, David O’Connor (2018)
Transforming Multilateral Diplomacy: The Inside Story of the Sustainable Development Goals
M. Poovey (1998)
A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society
University of Oslo, Norway
M. Farrell (2020)
Negotiating the Sustainable Development Goals
(2016)
A Short History of the MDGs
Peter Katzenstein (2002)
1. Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security
M. Haq (1995)
Reflections on human development
V. Ferreira (2012)
The future we wantJournal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 23
S. Merry (2016)
The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking
Other processes were also put in place, including the Intergovernmental Committee of Experts on Sustainable Development Financing, and workshops on technology
United Nations (2000) The Millennium Declaration
Available from: www.deliver2030.org/?p=6874
For example UK think tank Overseas Development Institute (ODI) undertook a massive program on the post-2015 and SDG agenda, with much of the financing from UK DfID
John Vereker (2002)
The Millennium Development Goals
M. Bøås, D. McNeill (2003)
Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World?
J. Teugels (2003)
The Politics of Large Numbers: a History of Statistical ReasoningJournal of the American Statistical Association, 98
Elisa Díaz-Martínez, E. Gibbons (2014)
The Questionable Power of the Millennium Development Goal to Reduce Child MortalityJournal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15
Yvette Morey, D. Eadie, Richard Purves, Lucie Hooper, Gillian Rosenberg, Stella Warren, Henry. Hillman, J. Vohra, Gerard Hastings, Alan Tapp (2004)
Author InformationDisability and Health Journal
T. Porter (1994)
Making Things QuantitativeScience in Context, 7
ND Trafficking, S. Merry (2016)
The Seductions of Quantification
The papers in this special issue provide accounts of the politics and knowledge that shaped the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The open and transparent processes in the Open Working Group (OWG) and Post‐2015 agenda consultations challenged the MDG paradigm and set more transformative and ambitious goals. But across many goals, there was slippage in ambition when targets and indicators were selected. In some cases, this is due to genuine difficulty in defining a suitable indicator. In other cases, there is clearly a contestation about the agenda, and indicators are used to reorient or pervert the meaning of the goal. The accounts of the negotiations– concerning inequality, sustainable agriculture, access to justice, education, environment – show how the selection of an indicator is purportedly a technical matter but is highly political, though obscured behind the veil of an objective and technical choice. The papers also highlight how the increasing role of big data and other non‐traditional sources of data is altering data production, dissemination and use, and fundamentally altering the epistemology of information and knowledge. This raises questions about ‘data for whom and for what’ – fundamental issues concerning the power of data to shape knowledge, the democratic governance of SDG indicators and of knowledge for development overall.
Global Policy – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.