Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Cosmopolitanism has become the new buzzword of the past two decades. Some of its meanings can be traced to the Cynics or the Stoics in Greek antiquity, others to the 18 th century elaboration of the concept by Immanuel Kant. Some authors even posit a new cosmopolitanism linked to the contemporary processes of globalization, deregulation of markets, post‐nationalism, migration, and feminism (e.g. Hannerz 2004 ). Derived from the Greek conjunction of “world” ( cosmos ) and “city” ( polis ), cosmopolitanism describes a “citizen of the world,” one who is not rootless but embedded in concentric circles of identity and “puts right before country, and universal reason before the symbols of national belonging” ( Nussbaum 1994 ). Cosmopolitanism may denote a certain outlook on the world, a social and cultural condition, a political project, a political subjectivity, an attitude, and finally, a practice or competence ( Vertovec and Cohen 2003 :8–14). Appiah's influential moral manifesto intertwines two strands in his interpretation of the concept: One is the idea that we have obligations to others, obligations that stretch beyond those to whom we are related by the ties of kith and kind, or even the more formal ties of
City & Society – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.