Introduction

Introduction This issue, like so many others, again illustrates how varied the history of the U.S. Supreme Court can be, and how far we have expanded the parameters of that subject. As I have often remarked, when I was in college and even in law school, all we heard about the high court was its opinions. A very famous jurist on the Fifth Circuit even said that judicial biographies were irrelevant; the only thing that counted was what ended up in U.S. Reports.As anyone who paid attention to the 2016 Presidential contest knows, Donald Trump's call to build a wall at the Mexican border with the United States resonated strongly with many Americans who saw unfettered immigration as a major cause of the nation's economic problems. As Polly Price shows us, this idea is not new in our history, and in one of its earlier iterations, came before the Supreme Court in several cases that Justice Stephen Field labeled the Chinese Exclusion Cases. Field, it should be noted, was probably the only member of the Court who had first‐hand knowledge of Chinese workers in the United States. His opinions showed little sympathy for the immigrants, and as Price, the Asa http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Supreme Court History Wiley

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/introduction-GpYFm3gu8S
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© Supreme Court Historical Society
ISSN
1059-4329
eISSN
1540-5818
D.O.I.
10.1111/jsch.12172
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This issue, like so many others, again illustrates how varied the history of the U.S. Supreme Court can be, and how far we have expanded the parameters of that subject. As I have often remarked, when I was in college and even in law school, all we heard about the high court was its opinions. A very famous jurist on the Fifth Circuit even said that judicial biographies were irrelevant; the only thing that counted was what ended up in U.S. Reports.As anyone who paid attention to the 2016 Presidential contest knows, Donald Trump's call to build a wall at the Mexican border with the United States resonated strongly with many Americans who saw unfettered immigration as a major cause of the nation's economic problems. As Polly Price shows us, this idea is not new in our history, and in one of its earlier iterations, came before the Supreme Court in several cases that Justice Stephen Field labeled the Chinese Exclusion Cases. Field, it should be noted, was probably the only member of the Court who had first‐hand knowledge of Chinese workers in the United States. His opinions showed little sympathy for the immigrants, and as Price, the Asa

Journal

Journal of Supreme Court HistoryWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off