Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Giselle Datz (2009)
State of Change: Global Turmoil and Government ReinventionPublic Administration Review, 69
H. Glennerster (2010)
Financing the United Kingdom's welfare states
Alesina Alesina, Devleeschauwer Devleeschauwer, Easterly Easterly, Kurlat Kurlat, Wacziarg Wacziarg (2003)
“FractionalizationJournal of Economic Growth, 8
A. Mcdonald (1989)
The Geddes Committee and the Formulation of Public Expenditure Policy, 1921–1922The Historical Journal, 32
Wilks Wilks (2010)
“Cutback Management: Challenges of Fiscal Consolidation for the Administrative SystemKorean Journal of Policy Studies, 24
M. Lodge, D. Gill (2011)
Toward a new era of administrative reform? The myth of post-NPM in New ZealandGovernance, 24
A. Roberts (2010)
The Logic of Discipline
P. Pierson, J. Bergeron (2001)
[Dismantling of the welfare state].Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke, 121 2
Patrick Dunleavy, H. Margetts, Simon Bastow, J. Tinkler (2006)
Digital Era Governance
W. Streeck (2010)
Noch so ein Sieg, und wir sind verloren. Der Nationalstaat nach der FinanzkriseLeviathan, 38
B. Peters (2011)
Governance responses to the fiscal crisis—comparative perspectivesPublic Money & Management, 31
Boin Boin (2009)
“The New World of Crises and Crisis ManagementReview of Policy Studies, 26
Tom Christensen, Per Lægreid (2008)
NPM and beyond — structure, culture and demographyInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 74
P. Honohan, D. Donovan, P. Gorecki, R. Mottiar (2010)
The Irish Banking Crisis: Regulatory and Financial Stability Policy
A. Boin (2009)
The New World of Crises and Crisis Management: Implications for Policymaking and Research
This article focuses on Public Service Bargains (PSBs) in the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) world in an age of austerity and makes four main claims. First, both logic and recent history suggest that states can respond to financial crises in more than one way. Second, we argue that the pressures on existing PSBs are not all the same in this group of states, given observable differences in their financial vulnerability. Third, we analyze countries' differential exposure to two other major challenges, namely, that of population aging and environmental risk. Fourth, we show that those areas of vulnerability can counteract one another in some cases but be mutually reinforcing in others, and we argue that “triply vulnerable” states in a composite analysis are those likely to face the strongest pressure to change their existing PSBs. We conclude that while homogenizing pressures cannot be ignored, PSB diversity is likely to continue.
Governance – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.