Influence of backside loading on the floating mass transducer: An in vitro experimental study

Influence of backside loading on the floating mass transducer: An in vitro experimental study KeypointsFloating mass transducer.Round window vibroplasty.Active middle ear implant.Tympanoplasty.INTRODUCTIONThe treatment of conductive, sensorineural and mixed hearing loss with an active middle‐ear implant (AMEI)—consisting of a floating mass transducer (FMT) connected to vibrating remnants of the ossicular chain, the so‐called vibroplasty—has proven to be a feasible and successful option for hearing rehabilitation. In cases lacking useful remnants of the ossicular chain or where the oval window in the middle ear is not accessible, a round window vibroplasty, such as the direct stimulation of the inner ear with the FMT placed at the round window membrane (RWM), still allows for successful hearing rehabilitation. Clinical studies have reported a variety of coupling techniques for an FMT facing the round window membrane, that is the front side, which may also account for the reported variance of the achieved audiometric results. Consequently, the most effective coupling method is still a matter of debate.In this regard, various in vitro studies have focused on the efficiency of different coupling techniques for the FMT at its front side facing the round window membrane, advocating the interposition of individually shaped cartilage or soft tissue (eg fascia or perichondrium), and the application of low contact pressure for an ideal backward http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical Otolaryngology Wiley

Influence of backside loading on the floating mass transducer: An in vitro experimental study

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/influence-of-backside-loading-on-the-floating-mass-transducer-an-in-pnDZT2OgR0
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN
1749-4478
eISSN
1749-4486
D.O.I.
10.1111/coa.13017
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

KeypointsFloating mass transducer.Round window vibroplasty.Active middle ear implant.Tympanoplasty.INTRODUCTIONThe treatment of conductive, sensorineural and mixed hearing loss with an active middle‐ear implant (AMEI)—consisting of a floating mass transducer (FMT) connected to vibrating remnants of the ossicular chain, the so‐called vibroplasty—has proven to be a feasible and successful option for hearing rehabilitation. In cases lacking useful remnants of the ossicular chain or where the oval window in the middle ear is not accessible, a round window vibroplasty, such as the direct stimulation of the inner ear with the FMT placed at the round window membrane (RWM), still allows for successful hearing rehabilitation. Clinical studies have reported a variety of coupling techniques for an FMT facing the round window membrane, that is the front side, which may also account for the reported variance of the achieved audiometric results. Consequently, the most effective coupling method is still a matter of debate.In this regard, various in vitro studies have focused on the efficiency of different coupling techniques for the FMT at its front side facing the round window membrane, advocating the interposition of individually shaped cartilage or soft tissue (eg fascia or perichondrium), and the application of low contact pressure for an ideal backward

Journal

Clinical OtolaryngologyWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

Keywords: ; ; ;

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off