During the three‐plus decades since Pennebaker and Beall's () seminal study we have witnessed an explosion of research on expressive writing. The impact of this simple, self‐administered intervention on important outcomes ranging from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms to immune system functioning has caught the imagination of the field. Interventions based on the expressive writing (EW) paradigm have found their way into diverse clinical settings and researchers have explored benefits of EW in a variety of clinical and nonclinical contexts.A substantial body of research, including multiple meta‐analyses, supports the effectiveness of expressive writing in bringing about both physical health benefits and self‐reported psychological benefits. However, evidence for the latter category of outcomes—psychological benefits—has been less dramatic, and the number of studies reporting null or, occasionally, adverse effects of expressive writing has remained just large enough to sustain doubts about its efficacy.In this context, Reinhold, Bürkner, and Holling's () meta‐analysis is timely and important. Given burgeoning evidence for the disease burden of depression worldwide, as well as the ubiquity of depression symptoms even in healthy individuals, it is important to determine what benefits EW may have for alleviating symptoms of depression. It is perhaps especially important to determine circumstances in
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ;
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud