IntroductionIt is widely recognized that best possible clinical care is tailored to individual patient characteristics (Sox et al.,; Hamburg and Collins, ; Collins and Varmus, ), including subjective factors like patient personal preference (Edwards and Elwyn, ). Individualized treatment rules (ITRs) formalize personalized clinical care as a function from up‐to‐date patient information to a recommended treatment. An optimal ITR maximizes the mean of some pre‐specified clinical outcome if applied to make treatment decisions for all patients in a population of interest. This definition of optimality is mathematically convenient as it reduces estimation of an optimal ITR to a scalar optimization problem over a class of potential ITRs. However, this formulation does not directly allow for shared decision making wherein patient preferences are integrated into the decision process (Drake et al., ; Barry and Edgman‐Levitan, ); on the other hand, direct preference elicitation in which the patient chooses parameters indexing a composite outcome is not feasible unless patients have undergone specialized training (Brennan, ; Braziunas, ; Lizotte et al., ). Thus, a common approach for preference elicitation is to administer a questionnaire populated with items that are accessible (meaningful) to a patient in a domain context yet are informative about preferences
Biometrics – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ;
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud