Abstract. Human blood platelets, prepared by the buffy‐coat method, were prepared and stored in different synthetic media. In a synthetic medium based on gluconate, acetate and citrate (GAC), the pH was 6.8 on day 6. This medium was chosen for further evaluation. The total platelet count and the leukocyte contamination were significantly lower in the platelet concentrates (PCs) prepared in GAC compared to PCs prepared in plasma. Platelets stored in plasma or in GAC were equally functional when tested for aggregation and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) secretion. Only stimuli that act through the arachidonic‐acid pathway induced a lower platelet response in GAC. Platelet morphology was quantified by measuring the difference in light transmission during stirring at different rates in an aggregometer; no significant differences for platelets stored in GAC as compared to plasma were observed. Activation of platelets was measured by binding of monoclonal antibodies (McAb) against the Gp IIb/IIIa complex and against activation‐dependent antigens (GMP 140 from the α‐granules and a 53‐kD glycoprotein from the lysosomal granules). There was no difference in binding of these McAb between platelets prepared and stored in plasma or GAC. We conclude that platelets prepared by the buffy‐coat method and stored in GAC have the same in vitro qualitities as platelets stored in plasma, except for the lower aggregation response by the archidonic‐acid pathway. This is probably due to an acetate‐induced decrease in intracellular pH.
Vox Sanguinis – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1991
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera