Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jeff Aronson (2000)
New Labour, New Language?BMJ : British Medical Journal, 320
Lloyd Lloyd (2001)
What do employee councils do? The impact of non‐union forms of representation in trade union organisationIndustrial Relations Journal, 32
G. Crockett, P. Dawkins (1994)
The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations SurveyAustralian Economic Review, 27
P. Gollan (2003)
All Talk But No Voice: Employee Voice at the Eurotunnel Call CentreEconomic and Industrial Democracy, 24
I. Watson, J. Buchanan, I. Campbell, C. Briggs (2003)
Fragmented futures: new challenges in working life
D. Koehn (1998)
Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust and Empathy
R. Wolfe, D. Putler (2002)
How Tight Are the Ties that Bind Stakeholder Groups?Organ. Sci., 13
Stoney Stoney, Winstanley Winstanley (2001)
Stakeholding: Confusion or utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrainJournal of Management Studies, 38
R. Markey, A. Hodgkinson, Jo Kowalczyk (2002)
Gender, part‐time employment and employee participation in Australian workplacesEmployee Relations, 24
A. Stewart (2008)
Stewart's Guide To Employment Law
J. Everett, T. Jamal (2004)
Multistakeholder Collaboration as Symbolic Marketplace and Pedagogic PracticeJournal of Management Inquiry, 13
Anne Alstott (1999)
Stakeholder SocietyStakeholder Management & Stakeholder Responsibilities eJournal
T. Donaldson (2002)
The Stakeholder Revolution and the Clarkson PrinciplesBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 12
P. Kirkbride (1986)
The Rhetoric of Power: The Case of Bettavalve Placid, Part 1Employee Relations, 8
J. Kaler (2002)
Morality and Strategy in Stakeholder identificationJournal of Business Ethics, 39
Jeff Frooman (1999)
Stakeholder Influence StrategiesAcademy of Management Review, 24
C. Gilligan (1982)
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women''s
R. Hyman (1997)
The Future of Employee RepresentationBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 35
J. Rowan (2000)
The Moral Foundation of Employee RightsJournal of Business Ethics, 24
R. Phillips (2003)
What Stakeholder Theory is NotBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 13
Williams Williams (2002)
Strategic planning and organizational value: Links to alignmentHuman Resource Development International, 5
Greenwood Greenwood (2007)
Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibilityJournal of Business Ethics, 74
P. Gollan (2002)
So What's the News? Management Strategies Towards Non-Union Employee Representation at News InternationalLabor: Public Policy & Regulation
Banerjee Banerjee (2000)
Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka uranium mineOrganization & Environment, 13
S. Banerjee (2000)
Whose Land Is It Anyway? National Interest, Indigenous Stakeholders, and Colonial DiscoursesOrganization & Environment, 13
Ronald Mitchell, Bradley Agle, D. Wood (1997)
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really CountsAcademy of Management Review, 22
J. Maltby, R. Wilkinson (1998)
Stakeholding and Corporate Governance in the UKPolitics, 18
P. Butler (2005)
Non‐union employee representation: exploring the efficacy of the voice processEmployee Relations, 27
A. Bryson, Andy Charlwood, J. Forth (2006)
Worker Voice, Managerial Response and Labour Productivity: An Empirical InvestigationERN: Productivity (Topic)
Michelle Riedlinger, Susan Mckay, C. Gallois (2004)
Identity and communication: Who collaborates in collaborative research?Public Communication of Science & Technology
R. Phillips (1997)
Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of FairnessBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 7
C. Provis (1996)
Unitarism, Pluralism, Interests and ValuesBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 34
Louis Schwartz, A. Hirschman (1972)
Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and StatesUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 120
Dickens Dickens (1998)
What HRM means for gender equity?Human Resource Management Journal, 8
S. Jacoby (2005)
Corporate Governance and SocietyChallenge, 48
C. Stoney, D. Winstanley (2001)
Stakeholding: Confusion or Utopia? Mapping the Conceptual TerrainCorporate Finance: Governance
Irene Lynch-Fannon (2004)
Employees as Corporate Stakeholders: Theory and Reality in a Transatlantic ContextJournal of Corporate Law Studies, 4
M. Greenwood (2007)
Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate ResponsibilityJournal of Business Ethics, 74
P. Gollan (2006)
Representation at Suncorp: what do the employees want?Human Resource Management Journal, 16
Cornelius Cornelius, Gagnon Gagnon (1999)
From ethics by proxy to ethics in action: New approaches to understanding ethics and HRMBusiness Ethics: A European Review, 8
P. Haynes, P. Boxall, K. Macky (2005)
Non-Union Voice and the Effectiveness of Joint Consultation in New ZealandEconomic and Industrial Democracy, 26
A. Pyman, B. Cooper, J. Teicher, P. Holland (2006)
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Employee Voice Arrangements in AustraliaERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)
R. Freeman, Robert Phillips (2002)
Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian DefenseBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 12
A. Crane, Dirk Matten (2004)
Business Ethics: A European Perspective: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization
M. Greenwood (2001)
Community as a stakeholder: focusing on corporate social and environmental reportingThe Journal of Corporate Citizenship
J. Wajcman (2000)
Feminism Facing Industrial Relations in BritainBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 38
R. Freeman (2010)
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
R. Freeman (1999)
Divergent Stakeholder TheoryAcademy of Management Review, 24
K. Gibson (2000)
The Moral Basis of Stakeholder TheoryJournal of Business Ethics, 26
The term ‘stakeholder’ has become ubiquitous. By almost any definition, employees are stakeholders in the firm. But what are the implications for employees to be classified as stakeholders? The expression carries a connotation of social responsibility; however, identification of persons as stakeholders remains controversial. This paper addresses significant implications of the labelling of employed persons as stakeholders which have not been fully explored in extant literature: the homogenising and unifying of employee interests; the construction of employees as their roles; the undermining of employment stability; and the risk to individual dignity and rights. It is argued that act of labelling employees as stakeholders is more likely to serve the interest of the organisation rather than the interests of employees.
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.