Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

‘I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder’: Implications of labelling employees as stakeholders

‘I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder’: Implications of labelling employees as... The term ‘stakeholder’ has become ubiquitous. By almost any definition, employees are stakeholders in the firm. But what are the implications for employees to be classified as stakeholders? The expression carries a connotation of social responsibility; however, identification of persons as stakeholders remains controversial. This paper addresses significant implications of the labelling of employed persons as stakeholders which have not been fully explored in extant literature: the homogenising and unifying of employee interests; the construction of employees as their roles; the undermining of employment stability; and the risk to individual dignity and rights. It is argued that act of labelling employees as stakeholders is more likely to serve the interest of the organisation rather than the interests of employees. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources Wiley

‘I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder’: Implications of labelling employees as stakeholders

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/i-used-to-be-an-employee-but-now-i-am-a-stakeholder-implications-of-0Mmt6ZqfK0

References (49)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
2009 Australian Human Resources Institute (AHRI)
ISSN
1038-4111
eISSN
1744-7941
DOI
10.1177/1038411109105441
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The term ‘stakeholder’ has become ubiquitous. By almost any definition, employees are stakeholders in the firm. But what are the implications for employees to be classified as stakeholders? The expression carries a connotation of social responsibility; however, identification of persons as stakeholders remains controversial. This paper addresses significant implications of the labelling of employed persons as stakeholders which have not been fully explored in extant literature: the homogenising and unifying of employee interests; the construction of employees as their roles; the undermining of employment stability; and the risk to individual dignity and rights. It is argued that act of labelling employees as stakeholders is more likely to serve the interest of the organisation rather than the interests of employees.

Journal

Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesWiley

Published: Aug 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.