Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world

How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world To investigate the process of habit formation in everyday life, 96 volunteers chose an eating, drinking or activity behaviour to carry out daily in the same context (for example ‘after breakfast’) for 12 weeks. They completed the self‐report habit index (SRHI) each day and recorded whether they carried out the behaviour. The majority (82) of participants provided sufficient data for analysis, and increases in automaticity (calculated with a sub‐set of SRHI items) were examined over the study period. Nonlinear regressions fitted an asymptotic curve to each individual's automaticity scores over the 84 days. The model fitted for 62 individuals, of whom 39 showed a good fit. Performing the behaviour more consistently was associated with better model fit. The time it took participants to reach 95% of their asymptote of automaticity ranged from 18 to 254 days; indicating considerable variation in how long it takes people to reach their limit of automaticity and highlighting that it can take a very long time. Missing one opportunity to perform the behaviour did not materially affect the habit formation process. With repetition of a behaviour in a consistent context, automaticity increases following an asymptotic curve which can be modelled at the individual level. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Social Psychology Wiley

How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/how-are-habits-formed-modelling-habit-formation-in-the-real-world-8V5Ju5JV5g
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN
0046-2772
eISSN
1099-0992
DOI
10.1002/ejsp.674
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To investigate the process of habit formation in everyday life, 96 volunteers chose an eating, drinking or activity behaviour to carry out daily in the same context (for example ‘after breakfast’) for 12 weeks. They completed the self‐report habit index (SRHI) each day and recorded whether they carried out the behaviour. The majority (82) of participants provided sufficient data for analysis, and increases in automaticity (calculated with a sub‐set of SRHI items) were examined over the study period. Nonlinear regressions fitted an asymptotic curve to each individual's automaticity scores over the 84 days. The model fitted for 62 individuals, of whom 39 showed a good fit. Performing the behaviour more consistently was associated with better model fit. The time it took participants to reach 95% of their asymptote of automaticity ranged from 18 to 254 days; indicating considerable variation in how long it takes people to reach their limit of automaticity and highlighting that it can take a very long time. Missing one opportunity to perform the behaviour did not materially affect the habit formation process. With repetition of a behaviour in a consistent context, automaticity increases following an asymptotic curve which can be modelled at the individual level. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal

European Journal of Social Psychology – Wiley

Published: Oct 1, 2010

References

  • Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives
    Ajzen, Ajzen
  • Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical activity?
    Armitage, Armitage
  • Predicting fruit consumption: Cognitions, intention and habits
    Brug, Brug; de Vet, de Vet; de Nooijer, de Nooijer; Verplanken, Verplanken
  • Mindfulness and the intention‐behavior relationship within the theory of planned behavior
    Chatzisarantis, Chatzisarantis; Hagger, Hagger
  • Does habit strength moderate the intention‐behaviour relationship in the Theory of Planned Behaviour? The case of fruit consumption
    de Bruijn, de Bruijn; Kremers, Kremers; de Vet, de Vet; de Nooijer, de Nooijer; van Meschelen, van Meschelen; Brug, Brug
  • Habit strength of physical activity and sedentary behavior among children and adolescents
    Kremers, Kremers; Brug, Brug
  • Adolescent screen‐viewing behaviour is associated with consumption of sugar‐sweetened beverages: the role of habit strength and perceived parental norms
    Kremers, Kremers; van der Horst, van der Horst; Brug, Brug
  • Strategic and automatic processes in propsective retrieval: A multiprocess framework
    McDaniel, McDaniel; Einstein, Einstein
  • Zum Gesetz des Pflanzenwachstums
    Mitscherlich, Mitscherlich
  • Explaining school children's fruit and vegetable consumption: The contributions of availability, accessibility, exposure, parental consumption and habit in addition to psychosocial factors
    Reinaerts, Reinaerts; de Nooijer, de Nooijer; Candel, Candel; de Vries, de Vries
  • Predicting habit: The case of physical exercise
    Verplanken, Verplanken; Melkevik, Melkevik
  • Beyond frequency: Habit as a mental construct
    Verplanken, Verplanken
  • Reflections on past behavior: A self‐report index of habit strength
    Verplanken, Verplanken; Orbell, Orbell
  • Attitude versus general habit: Antecedents of travel mode choice
    Verplanken, Verplanken; Aarts, Aarts; van Knippenberg, van Knippenberg; van Knippenberg, van Knippenberg
  • Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action
    Wood, Wood; Quinn, Quinn; Kashy, Kashy
  • Changing circumstances, disrupting habits
    Wood, Wood; Tam, Tam; Witt, Witt
  • A new look at habits and the habit‐goal interface
    Wood, Wood; Neal, Neal