Hospital nurses’ information retrieval behaviours in relation to evidence based nursing: a literature review

Hospital nurses’ information retrieval behaviours in relation to evidence based nursing: a... Key MessagesHospital nurses use Google and peers more than bibliographic databases for retrieving information on evidence based nursing.International differences in the use of PubMed and CINAHL exist.Nurses lack skills in information retrieval in bibliographic databases and time dedicated to it.Knowing the needs and the information seeking behaviour of the nurses can help the health librarians to make targeted courses and information material.BackgroundClinical nurses have always obtained health care information for the benefit of patient care. Some studies (Dee & Stanley, ; Morris‐Docker, Angela, Harrison, Wolstenholme, & Black, ; Pravikoff, Tanner, & Pierce, ), mainly over 10 years ago, document how and where nurses find this information (Dee & Stanley, ). In these studies, the overall conclusion was that the nurses involved preferred human or printed resources over electronic resources such as bibliographic databases, and that the nurses have many barriers towards electronic resources. In the Pravikoff study (Pravikoff et al., ) with 760 nurse respondents, the conclusion was that they were more confident in using Google than using bibliographic databases. When only looking at the bibliographic databases, PubMed or MEDLINE and CINAHL were the most commonly used sources for information retrieval. The question is whether the barriers towards searching in bibliographic http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Health Information & Libraries Journal Wiley

Hospital nurses’ information retrieval behaviours in relation to evidence based nursing: a literature review

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/hospital-nurses-information-retrieval-behaviours-in-relation-to-INARpZ6X0h
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Health Information and Libraries Journal © 2018 Health Libraries Group
ISSN
1471-1834
eISSN
1471-1842
D.O.I.
10.1111/hir.12204
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Key MessagesHospital nurses use Google and peers more than bibliographic databases for retrieving information on evidence based nursing.International differences in the use of PubMed and CINAHL exist.Nurses lack skills in information retrieval in bibliographic databases and time dedicated to it.Knowing the needs and the information seeking behaviour of the nurses can help the health librarians to make targeted courses and information material.BackgroundClinical nurses have always obtained health care information for the benefit of patient care. Some studies (Dee & Stanley, ; Morris‐Docker, Angela, Harrison, Wolstenholme, & Black, ; Pravikoff, Tanner, & Pierce, ), mainly over 10 years ago, document how and where nurses find this information (Dee & Stanley, ). In these studies, the overall conclusion was that the nurses involved preferred human or printed resources over electronic resources such as bibliographic databases, and that the nurses have many barriers towards electronic resources. In the Pravikoff study (Pravikoff et al., ) with 760 nurse respondents, the conclusion was that they were more confident in using Google than using bibliographic databases. When only looking at the bibliographic databases, PubMed or MEDLINE and CINAHL were the most commonly used sources for information retrieval. The question is whether the barriers towards searching in bibliographic

Journal

Health Information & Libraries JournalWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; ;

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off