# Horton's Laws and the fractal nature of streams

Horton's Laws and the fractal nature of streams Stream networks and catchment basins are characterized by numerous fractal dimensions, the traditional one being the mainstream length as a function of length scale which we denote by d. We consider an ideal Horton system and define fractal dimensions based on (1) the subcatchment length‐area relationship, which gives D1; (2) the total length of streams as a function of scale, which gives a network similarity dimension D2; (3) the mainstream length‐area relationship (D3), and (4) the total area of streams as a function of areal scale (D4). These fractal dimensions are related to the values of the bifurcation ratio, the stream length ratio, and the stream area ratio. Their value should be indirectly estimated from these Horton parameters. An improved understanding of the relationships between the fractal dimension and Horton's laws is obtained by defining an eigenarea of a stream of a particular Horton order. This is the area of the drainage basin which is not drained by streams of immediately lower order. The variation of eigenareas with scale controls the value of D1, which equals D3 for hydrologically realistic systems. In such cases D4 = 2. This paper assumes that river systems are Hortonian in nature and that measured departures from Hortonianity are due to statistical variability. Estimates of the Horton parameters and of the fractal dimensions are therefore subject to uncertainty. Two sources of statistical variability are considered herein: The first source of statistical variability is due to the fluctuations in stream numbers, stream lengths, and stream areas. These fluctuations affect the values of the Horton parameters, which are traditionally estimated using a graphical technique. We show that an analytical technique (which corresponds to a constrained graphical technique) is preferable. The second source of variability that we consider arises from the fact that estimates of Horton's parameters and fractal dimensions are always made on truncated systems because the particular scales of measurement determine the order of the catchment. In a Horton system it is straight forward to estimate D1, which is defined exactly at all scales. Direct attempts to estimate D2 and D3 (as opposed to indirect attempts via the Horton parameters) are difficult because their true value is approached asymptotically in the limit of infinite‐order catchments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Water Resources Research Wiley

# Horton's Laws and the fractal nature of streams

Water Resources Research, Volume 29 (5) – May 1, 1993
13 pages

/lp/wiley/horton-s-laws-and-the-fractal-nature-of-streams-Hgwp7nOzB6
Publisher
Wiley
Published in 1993 by the American Geophysical Union.
ISSN
0043-1397
eISSN
1944-7973
DOI
10.1029/92WR02731
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

### Abstract

Stream networks and catchment basins are characterized by numerous fractal dimensions, the traditional one being the mainstream length as a function of length scale which we denote by d. We consider an ideal Horton system and define fractal dimensions based on (1) the subcatchment length‐area relationship, which gives D1; (2) the total length of streams as a function of scale, which gives a network similarity dimension D2; (3) the mainstream length‐area relationship (D3), and (4) the total area of streams as a function of areal scale (D4). These fractal dimensions are related to the values of the bifurcation ratio, the stream length ratio, and the stream area ratio. Their value should be indirectly estimated from these Horton parameters. An improved understanding of the relationships between the fractal dimension and Horton's laws is obtained by defining an eigenarea of a stream of a particular Horton order. This is the area of the drainage basin which is not drained by streams of immediately lower order. The variation of eigenareas with scale controls the value of D1, which equals D3 for hydrologically realistic systems. In such cases D4 = 2. This paper assumes that river systems are Hortonian in nature and that measured departures from Hortonianity are due to statistical variability. Estimates of the Horton parameters and of the fractal dimensions are therefore subject to uncertainty. Two sources of statistical variability are considered herein: The first source of statistical variability is due to the fluctuations in stream numbers, stream lengths, and stream areas. These fluctuations affect the values of the Horton parameters, which are traditionally estimated using a graphical technique. We show that an analytical technique (which corresponds to a constrained graphical technique) is preferable. The second source of variability that we consider arises from the fact that estimates of Horton's parameters and fractal dimensions are always made on truncated systems because the particular scales of measurement determine the order of the catchment. In a Horton system it is straight forward to estimate D1, which is defined exactly at all scales. Direct attempts to estimate D2 and D3 (as opposed to indirect attempts via the Horton parameters) are difficult because their true value is approached asymptotically in the limit of infinite‐order catchments.

### Journal

Water Resources ResearchWiley

Published: May 1, 1993

## You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

### DeepDyve is your personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
that matters to you.

over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just \$49/month

### Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

### Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

### Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

### Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

DeepDyve

DeepDyve

### Pro

Price

FREE

\$49/month
\$360/year

Save searches from
PubMed

Create folders to

Export folders, citations