Hitting and missing targets by ambulance services for emergency calls: effects of different systems of performance measurement within the UK

Hitting and missing targets by ambulance services for emergency calls: effects of different... Summary. Following devolution, differences developed between UK countries in systems of measuring performance against a common target that ambulance services ought to respond to 75% of calls for what may be immediately life threatening emergencies (category A calls) within 8 minutes. Only in England was this target integral to a ranking system of ‘star rating’, which inflicted reputational damage on services that failed to hit targets, and only in England has this target been met. In other countries, the target has been missed by such large margins that services would have been publicly reported as failing, if they had been covered by the English system of star ratings. The paper argues that this case‐study adds to evidence from comparisons of different systems of hospital performance measurement that, to have an effect, these systems need to be designed to inflict reputational damage on those that have performed poorly; and it explores implications of this hypothesis. The paper also asks questions about the adequacy of systems of performance measurement of ambulance services in UK countries. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) Wiley

Hitting and missing targets by ambulance services for emergency calls: effects of different systems of performance measurement within the UK

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/hitting-and-missing-targets-by-ambulance-services-for-emergency-calls-qCjhFp2DMK
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Journal compilation © 2009 Royal Statistical Society
ISSN
0964-1998
eISSN
1467-985X
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00557.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary. Following devolution, differences developed between UK countries in systems of measuring performance against a common target that ambulance services ought to respond to 75% of calls for what may be immediately life threatening emergencies (category A calls) within 8 minutes. Only in England was this target integral to a ranking system of ‘star rating’, which inflicted reputational damage on services that failed to hit targets, and only in England has this target been met. In other countries, the target has been missed by such large margins that services would have been publicly reported as failing, if they had been covered by the English system of star ratings. The paper argues that this case‐study adds to evidence from comparisons of different systems of hospital performance measurement that, to have an effect, these systems need to be designed to inflict reputational damage on those that have performed poorly; and it explores implications of this hypothesis. The paper also asks questions about the adequacy of systems of performance measurement of ambulance services in UK countries.

Journal

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)Wiley

Published: Jan 1, 2009

References

  • The interplay between economic and political logics: path dependency in health care in England.
    Bevan, Bevan; Robinson, Robinson
  • Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly
    Bird, Bird; Cox, Cox; Farewell, Farewell; Goldstein, Goldstein; Holt, Holt; Smith, Smith
  • Evaluating the quality of medical care
    Donabedian, Donabedian
  • Do targets matter?: a comparison of English and Welsh National Health priorities
    Hauck, Hauck; Street, Street
  • Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision‐making research
    Hibbard, Hibbard; Slovic, Slovic; Jacquelyn, Jacquelyn; Jewett, Jewett
  • Strategies for reporting health plan performance information to consumers: evidence from controlled studies
    Hibbard, Hibbard; Slovic, Slovic; Peters, Peters; Finucane, Finucane
  • Gaming in targetworld: the targets approach to managing British public services
    Hood, Hood
  • Reporting health care performance: learning from the past, prospects for the future
    Mannion, Mannion; Davies, Davies
  • Public disclosure of comparative clinical performance data: lessons from the Scottish experience
    Mannion, Mannion; Goddard, Goddard
  • Balancing the NHS balanced scorecard
    Patel, Patel; Chaussalet, Chaussalet; Millard, Millard
  • Do star ratings really reflect hospital performance
    Snelling, Snelling
  • Surgical audit: statistical lessons from Nightingale and Codman
    Spiegelhalter, Spiegelhalter
  • The mystery of the lost star: a statistical detective story
    Spiegelhalter, Spiegelhalter
  • Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance
    Spiegelhalter, Spiegelhalter

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off