Objective To establish the factor structure, reliability and validity of a brief CESD scale among Community dwelling older adults in Singapore. Method Data were derived from interviews conducted among 1,013 randomly selected non‐institutionalized older adults aged 65 years and above in Singapore. First, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to test three factors in the entire sample: a one‐factor model, a two‐factor model (Depressed affect, Positive affect) and a three‐factor model (Depressed affect, Somatic retardation, and Positive affect). Next, Multi‐Group Analysis was conducted to test the scale invariance for male and female older adults. Results Findings supported a two‐factor model––depressed affect and positive affect for the entire sample. In addition, multi‐group analysis showed the two‐factor structure to be invariant for male and female older adults. Conclusion Brief CESD demonstrates adequate reliability and validity. The CESD scores can be used to compare symptoms of depression between male and female older adults. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2008
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera