Two independent domains models are derived by using an extended similarity hypothesis according to which the pore water distribution function is interpreted to be ƒ(r, ρ) = h(r)h(ρ). When this hypothesis is applied to the Néel diagram and the Mualem diagram, it yields two different models which permit prediction of the hysteretical relationship from only one branch of the main hysteresis loop. The models yield an extremely simple formula for the relationship between the boundary drying and wetting curves. Moreover, a universal nondimensional hysteresis is derived for all soils. Comparison with experiments shows that the model which uses the Néel diagram fails to reproduce a reasonable shape of the hysteresis curves. However, much better results are achieved by the second model, which uses the Mualem diagram. In some cases the predicted curves are in very good agreement with the observed ones. For soils in which blockage against air entry plays a significant role the model is less efficient as a predictive tool. It yields poor results in the region of high water content, while the predicted curves are very close to the measured ones in the range of low water content.
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 1977
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera