Evaluation of direct antifungal susceptibility testing methods of Candida spp. from positive blood culture bottles

Evaluation of direct antifungal susceptibility testing methods of Candida spp. from positive... INTRODUCTIONBloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Candida species are significant causes of morbidity and mortality, especially in intensive care unit patients and patients with hematological malignancy. Although Candida spp. were the fourth most common pathogens isolated from blood cultures, the crude mortality rate of Candida infections was the highest among all nosocomial BSI. Therefore, rapid and accurate diagnostic methods are essential for appropriate management of Candida BSIs. However, blood culture is still the gold standard diagnostic method in spite of long resulting time and low sensitivity rate in candidemia. The standard method of blood culture involves at least overnight agar medium subculture and then identification and antifungal susceptibility testing after a bottle is signaled as positive for Candida; it is time consuming and can delay the appropriate therapy. Several standard methods were suggested for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast by both Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute—CLSI (M27‐A3 and M44‐A2) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—EUCAST (E.DEF 7.2). Besides, there are many commercial manual or automated systems such as Etest, Sensititre YeastOne, and Vitek which are used commonly in many clinical laboratories.Several studies including direct inoculation from positive blood culture bottles have been performed in order to decrease the time http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Wiley

Evaluation of direct antifungal susceptibility testing methods of Candida spp. from positive blood culture bottles

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/evaluation-of-direct-antifungal-susceptibility-testing-methods-of-gY7fQ7pskG
Publisher
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN
0887-8013
eISSN
1098-2825
D.O.I.
10.1002/jcla.22297
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONBloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Candida species are significant causes of morbidity and mortality, especially in intensive care unit patients and patients with hematological malignancy. Although Candida spp. were the fourth most common pathogens isolated from blood cultures, the crude mortality rate of Candida infections was the highest among all nosocomial BSI. Therefore, rapid and accurate diagnostic methods are essential for appropriate management of Candida BSIs. However, blood culture is still the gold standard diagnostic method in spite of long resulting time and low sensitivity rate in candidemia. The standard method of blood culture involves at least overnight agar medium subculture and then identification and antifungal susceptibility testing after a bottle is signaled as positive for Candida; it is time consuming and can delay the appropriate therapy. Several standard methods were suggested for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast by both Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute—CLSI (M27‐A3 and M44‐A2) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—EUCAST (E.DEF 7.2). Besides, there are many commercial manual or automated systems such as Etest, Sensititre YeastOne, and Vitek which are used commonly in many clinical laboratories.Several studies including direct inoculation from positive blood culture bottles have been performed in order to decrease the time

Journal

Journal of Clinical Laboratory AnalysisWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off