Estimating the probability of clonal relatedness of pairs of tumors in cancer patients

Estimating the probability of clonal relatedness of pairs of tumors in cancer patients IntroductionIn recent years there have been increasing numbers of studies evaluating the clonal relatedness of distinct tumors in the same patient to determine whether the tumors arise from a common ancestral cell or if they developed entirely independently. Examples include studies that compared patterns of losses of heterozygosity (e.g., Imyanitov et al., ) and studies involving comparisons of genome‐wide copy number arrays (e.g., Bollet et al., ). Clonality testing of this nature seeks to determine if the tumors share somatic mutations or copy number changes, providing evidence that the tumors arose from the same precursor, clonal cell. The technology for conducting these investigations has changed as genetic technology has evolved, from studies of a few markers of loss of heterozygosity to genome‐wide studies of copy number profiling to, more recently, comparisons of mutational profiles from next generation sequencing. Based on such data, the determination of clonal relatedness is fundamentally statistical since many of the somatic changes in the tumors may have occurred after the tumors have evolved separately, so that the somatic fingerprints of the tumors may be quite different even if the tumors are truly clonal. Our group has developed statistical tests for clonal relatedness for use in http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Biometrics Wiley

Estimating the probability of clonal relatedness of pairs of tumors in cancer patients

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/estimating-the-probability-of-clonal-relatedness-of-pairs-of-tumors-in-aDDw8YnZ7L
Publisher
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Copyright
© 2018, The International Biometric Society
ISSN
0006-341X
eISSN
1541-0420
D.O.I.
10.1111/biom.12710
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

IntroductionIn recent years there have been increasing numbers of studies evaluating the clonal relatedness of distinct tumors in the same patient to determine whether the tumors arise from a common ancestral cell or if they developed entirely independently. Examples include studies that compared patterns of losses of heterozygosity (e.g., Imyanitov et al., ) and studies involving comparisons of genome‐wide copy number arrays (e.g., Bollet et al., ). Clonality testing of this nature seeks to determine if the tumors share somatic mutations or copy number changes, providing evidence that the tumors arose from the same precursor, clonal cell. The technology for conducting these investigations has changed as genetic technology has evolved, from studies of a few markers of loss of heterozygosity to genome‐wide studies of copy number profiling to, more recently, comparisons of mutational profiles from next generation sequencing. Based on such data, the determination of clonal relatedness is fundamentally statistical since many of the somatic changes in the tumors may have occurred after the tumors have evolved separately, so that the somatic fingerprints of the tumors may be quite different even if the tumors are truly clonal. Our group has developed statistical tests for clonal relatedness for use in

Journal

BiometricsWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

Keywords: ; ; ; ;

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial