Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Music Analysis, 23/ii±iii (2004) 403 à Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2005. Published by Blackwell Publishing, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK CRITICAL FORUM of certain musical incongruities can be held to correlate `exactly' with certain structures of semantic or expressive ambiguity ± for instance, not only irony, but also parody, satire and the grotesque. Her interpretative method then proceeds to amplify the information obtained from this structural hypothesis by drawing on data accumulated from various historical, biographical and cultural frames of reference. In the first instance, however, the author finds it necessary to distinguish irony from mere metaphor, the former being denoted by a structural negation, an inherent conflict within a given cultural unit. As an example, she cites Hatten's analysis of the statement `John is a tiger'.3 If John is an aggressive person, then the statement is a metaphor that connects John with the aggressive qualities of a tiger. Alternatively, if John is not aggressive, then the sentence contains a negation, a seeming paradox; it is then more likely to be ironic than merely metaphorical. The structural negation that exemplifies irony can lie within the message itself, or between the message and its context. Yet since such
Music Analysis – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.