Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, and lysosomes are disorganized in lung fibroblasts from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

Endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, and lysosomes are disorganized in lung fibroblasts from chronic... IntroductionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death world‐wide. Although the disease can be developed via a variety of different factors, such as occupational, environmental, and genetic alterations, the most prevalent cause of COPD is cigarette smoking (Tuder and Petrache ). It has been shown that cigarette smoking causes oxidative stress to the cells of the lungs (Tuder et al. ).Stress is also a natural occurring incidence for all cells in the body. Whether this stress is due to a foreign chemical, heat stress, starvation, or oxidative stress, the cell must be able to quickly adapt to its current situation or else die. In order to adapt to stressors, signaling pathways in eukaryotic cells are initiated that allow for a cascade of genes and proteins to be activated, with the ultimate goal to be maintenance of homeostasis (Cao and Kaufman ; Schwarz and Blower ).The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a central component in eukaryotic cells, responsible for protein translation, folding, and transport (Schwarz and Blower ). It is a continuous membrane system consisting of tubules and sheets that begin at the nuclear membrane and extend throughout the cell. Despite its structure, the ER is a dynamic organelle that continuously changes based on the state of the cell, and is at the beginning of the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Proteins are translated in the ER, where they can then be modified and packaged into vesicles bound for the Golgi complex. Through the Golgi, transported proteins can be further modified before sorting to their final localization at the lysosome or plasma membrane where the proteins function.Due to its important and central role in the cell, the ER has several mechanisms to ensure that homeostasis is maintained. The ER stress response activates a cascade of signals that allows the cell to respond to unwanted stressors (Cao and Kaufman ). In eukaryotic cells, there are three major ER stress pathways that detect increased levels of unfolded proteins indicative of cellular stress. The three branches of the ER stress response pathway include via inositol requiring enzyme‐1 (IRE1), protein kinase‐like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), which activate the upregulation of different genes involved in coping with the ER stress response and restoring homeostasis to the cell (Sano and Reed ).Short‐term studies in mice on the oxidative stress present in the lungs have been examined (Geraghty et al. ; Kenche et al. ; Lee et al. ), but little is known about how long‐term smoking affects the cells of the lung, for example as in COPD, and if ER stress response is maintained when under continuous oxidative stress.We aimed to examine if the endomembrane pathway was altered in patients with COPD as opposed to never‐smokers or healthy ever‐smokers. By using lung fibroblasts from these three subject groups, we observed the phenotypes of the endomembrane system under stressed and unstressed conditions. Furthermore, gene expression of four different genes previously stated to be induced under stress conditions (Oslowski and Urano ) was measured. Finally, we aimed to examine changes in active Caspase‐3 levels to determine if apoptosis was affected in these cells.Materials and MethodsSubjectsMaterial from a total of six healthy never‐smokers, four healthy ever‐smokers, and fifteen COPD patients was used in the different experiments in this study (Table ). COPD patients were defined according to the GOLD criteria (FEV1/FVC < 0.7). The subjects underwent bronchoscopy and central airway lung biopsies were obtained. Fibroblasts were grown out from biopsies in Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum as previously described (Tufvesson et al. ). Cells were harvested for analysis at passages 3–6. All subjects signed written informed consent and the study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board in Lund.Subject characteristicsNever‐smokers (n = 6)Ever‐smokers (n = 4)COPD (n = 15)Gender (Female/Male)4/22/26/9Age (years)50 (42–57)66 (65–67)65 (60–70)Smoking status (current/former)0/00/48/7Pack years027 (23–33)40 (27–45)FEV1 (L)3.44 (3.20–3.56)2.97 (2.21–3.60)1.63 (1.44–2.18)FEV1 (%p)114 (95–139)91 (89–96)55 (47–65)FEV1/FVC0.84 (0.81–0.88)0.79 (0.75–0.82)0.49 (0.44–0.55)Induction of ER stressTime course experiments were performed over six hours. Fibroblasts were grown to confluency in six well plates for subsequent RNA extraction and qPCR analysis or in chambered slides for immunofluorescence staining. DMEM (supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum) containing: Tunicamycin (5 μg/mL), Thapsagargin (1μM), Brefeldin A (50 μmol/L), dithiothreitol (DTT, 1 mmol/L), or controls of EtOH (0.01%) or 1 × Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) were added to the cells for detecting the unfolded protein response (Samali et al. ; Cawley et al. ). After 0 or 6 h, cells were washed once with 1 × PBS. Cells in plates were then harvested for RNA analyses according to the Promega RNA Cell extraction kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and cells in chamber slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Histolab Products AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) for immunofluorescence staining.RNA extraction and qPCR analysisRNA was also extracted from fibroblasts before and after addition of ER stress inducing chemicals (as described above). cDNA synthesis and quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR) was performed as described previously (Tufvesson et al. ; Weidner et al. ). All BiP, HERPUD1, ERP72, and WARS mRNA expression was normalized against expression of the reference genes β‐Actin and GAPDH (for primer sequences see Table ).Primer sequencesPrimer nameSequenceβ‐Actin5′ AGC ACA GAG CCT CGC CTT T3′ GGA ATC CTT CTG ACC CAT GCGAPDH5′ GAA GGT GAA GGT CGG AGT CA3′ TGG AGG ATG GTG ATG GGA TTGRP78/BiP5′ TAG CGT ATG GTG CTG CTG TC3′ TTT GTC AGG GGT CTT TCA CCHERPUD15′ ACT TGC TTC CAA AGC AGG AA3′ CCC TTT GCC TTA AAC CAT CAERP725′ CAT CAA GGA CTT CGT GCT GA3′ TTC ACC TCC CCA GCA TAG TCWARS5′ CAC CCC TGA TTG GAC AGT CT3′ TGG AAG ACA CTG CAG AGG TGImmunofluorescence and microscopyThe staining procedure was performed as described previously (Tufvesson et al. ). Briefly, cells were rinsed with 1 × PBS and fixed with 4% PFA and rinsed before addition of permeabilization buffer (PBSTw; 1 × PBS; 1% Tween20) and blocked with blocking buffer (2% normal goat serum (NGS; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in PBSTw). Cells were then incubated with various primary antibodies in blocking buffer. Cells were washed with PBSTw and incubated with fluorescently coupled secondary antibodies in blocking buffer. Cells were washed with 1× PBS and incubated with 30 nmol/L DAPI (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and rinsed in water before the addition of Dako mounting solution (DAKO, Glostup, Denmark) and a coverslip. Slides were stored in a dark, moist chamber at 4°C until observation. Microscopy was performed using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with an Olympus DP80 camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and a Nikon Plan Apo 40×/0.95 objective. Images were obtained with CellSens Dimension (Olympus) and processed in ImageJ software (U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).AntibodiesPrimary antibodies used included: protein disulfide isomerase (PDI, mouse anti‐human (Prod# MA3019); 1:250, Life Technologies), golgin‐97 (rabbit anti‐human (Prod #A21270); conc. 1:100, Life Technologies), and lysosomal‐associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1, mouse anti‐human (ab25630); 1:100, Abcam Cambridge, MA). Secondary antibodies were: AlexaFluor488 (anti‐mouse (IgG1), conc. 1:750), AlexaFluor555 (anti‐mouse(IgG2a), conc. 1:750), and AlexaFluor647 (anti‐rabbit, conc. 1:750), all from Life Technologies.Active Caspase‐3 assayCells were grown to confluency in six well plates and processed and analyzed according to the protocol of the human Active Caspase‐3 Quantikine ELISA kit used (KM300, R&Dsystems, Minneapolis, MN).StatisticsData were analyzed using Prism 5 software (Graphpad, La Jolla, CA) and used as described in the figure legends. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test was used for analyses among several groups, and followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test for comparison between separate groups.ResultsEndoplasmic reticulum is disorganized in COPD patientsIn order to assess the effects caused by long‐term cigarette smoking on the internal membrane systems in the cell, we obtained lung fibroblasts from healthy never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD patients. We found the ER structure to be disorganized in COPD patients. Never‐smoking and ever‐smoking subjects had a reticulated network as was expected, but COPD patients showed a more clustered, punctate structure to varying degrees (Fig. A). To determine the level of disorganization seen in each patient, the number of cells showing reticulated, dotty, clustered, or a combination of the phenotypes were observed (Fig. B) and a minimum of 200 cells per subject group were counted. There was a significant difference between never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD patients (Fig. C), with a lower proportion of fibroblasts with reticulated ER in COPD patients (P = 0.0006) and instead a higher proportion of fibroblasts with clustered ER (P = 0.007) or the combination of dotty and clustered ER (P = 0.044), while the proportion of fibroblasts with a dotty phenotype was not significantly different (P = 0.19).The endoplasmic reticulum is disorganized in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) lung fibroblasts. Representative images of lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers and ever‐smokers are shown along with three different COPD patients. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER; white) appears more disorganized in COPD patients with a more dotty and patchy structure versus the more reticulated structure shown in never‐smokers and ever‐smokers (A). The nuclei are shown in blue. Phenotypes of the different ER structures (B) were counted and compared (C) for never‐smokers (n = 5), ever‐smokers (n = 5), and COPD patients (n = 12). Scale bar equals 20 μm. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 showing significant differences among the subject groups in the proportion of the respective cell phenotypes.Golgi and lysosomes are altered in COPD patientsDue to the alterations seen in the ER of COPD patient lung fibroblasts, we examined other organelles in the endomembrane system. We found that in COPD patients, the size of the Golgi, as compared to the nucleus, was altered in lung fibroblasts as compared to never‐smokers or ever‐smokers, but not significant (P = 0.087, Fig. A–C).Golgi are altered in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) lung fibroblasts. Representative images of Golgi in lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and three COPD patients are presented. The structure of the Golgi (white), overall, remained unchanged among the three groups (A), but measurements comparing Golgi size to nucleus size (C) showed a reduction in COPD patients (n = 10) compared to never‐smokers (n = 5) and ever‐smokers (n = 5). (C). Cells from (A) were enlarged to better show Golgi structure (B). Nuclei are shown in blue. Scale bar equals 20 μm.Furthermore, the lysosomes also had a different appearance. In never‐smokers, the lysosomes appeared numerous and found throughout the full‐length of the cell, whereas in ever‐smokers, the lysosomes were more clustered around the cell nucleus (Fig. ). In COPD patients, lysosomes were spread throughout the cell, but did not seem as numerous as in never‐smokers.Lysosome distribution is changed in lung fibroblasts from smokers. Lysosomes (white) were examined in the three groups. In never‐smokers, lysosomes appeared distributed throughout the cell, more perinuclear in ever‐smokers, and dispersed, but less numerous in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients. Nuclei are shown in blue. Scale bar equals 20 μm.Internal membranes are altered in COPD patients under stress conditionsDue to the changes in the endomembrane system in COPD patients under normal culture conditions, we investigated if these cells would be sensitive to chemical stressors known to induce the ER stress response (Samali et al. ; Fig. ).Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress induces changes in internal membranes. Time course experiments were performed in lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients with different ER stress‐inducing chemicals. Representative images of each subject and the control (A) or chemical treatments: DTT (B), tunicamycin (C), thapsigargin (D), and Brefeldin A (E) are shown. The ER (cyan), Golgi (magenta), lysosomes (yellow), and nuclei (blue) are depicted. Scale bar equals 20 μm.Under DTT stress, which results in unfolded proteins through the reduction of disulfide bonds (Jiang et al. ), we observed that fibroblasts from never‐smokers appeared to exhibit a change in the Golgi complex where it appeared to collapse into a ball‐like structure in the perinuclear region. This phenomenon was not readily observed in ever‐smokers or COPD patients (Fig. B).Under stress from tunicamycin (Schonthal ), an inhibitor of N‐linked glycosylation (Huang et al. ), lysosomes appeared to change. In all cases, lysosomes appeared to cluster in a more perinuclear pattern. In ever‐smokers and COPD subjects, lysosomes also appear a bit more clustered, with larger patches occurring (Fig. C).Thapsigargin (Schonthal ) is used to inhibit the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase. Treatment with thapsigargin resulted in COPD cells that were observed to have more spread out lysosomes, appearing throughout the cell, unlike their never‐smoker or ever‐smoker counterparts, which showed a tendency for perinuclear clustering (Fig. D).Finally, Brefeldin A is known to disrupt the Golgi complex (Samali et al. ) and this was observed in all cells. In both ever‐smokers and COPD patients, though, the appearance of lysosomes was less pronounced than in cells from never‐smokers (Fig. E).Expression of ER stress‐induced genes in COPD patientsSince we observed phenotypic differences in never‐smoker, ever‐smoker, and COPD cells, we also investigated whether there were also changes in expression of genes induced under the ER stress, i.e., BiP, HERPUD1, ERP72, and WARS (Samali et al. ), before and after addition of a stressor (fold change in expression compared to baseline is presented in Fig. ). Overall, in most subjects there was an upregulation of ER stress response genes after addition of stressor compared to baseline, i.e., the fold change is >1 (Fig. ). In addition, significant differences in stress response were seen between never‐smoker, ever‐smoker, and COPD cells in ERP72 under stress by Brefeldin A and thapsigargin (Fig. C). No significant changes were observed in BiP, HERPUD1, or WARS expression after any stressor.Changes of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress gene expression in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) lung fibroblasts. The fold change of ER stress gene mRNA (the change between 0 and 6 h time point) in lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers (n = 5), ever‐smokers (n = 4), and COPD patients (n = 12) after ER stressors (DTT, tunicamycin, thapsagargin, and Brefeldin A) are presented. No major change in gene expression of BiP (A), HERPUD1 (B), or WARS (D) among the different subject types or chemical stressors was observed. Nonsignificant changes to ERP72 were observed with DTT and tunicamycin, but changes among the groups were observed in thapsigargin and Brefeldin A (C). The line in each case represents the median value. KW = Kruskal–Wallis, D = Dunn's multiple comparison test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.Additionally, we examined splicing of XBP1 mRNA, which is induced upon ER stress (Cao and Kaufman ). mRNA from all subjects was analyzed at both 0 and 6 h during the time course. We observed XBP1 splicing at 6 h in all cells in which chemical stressors were applied, but no splicing in any cells at 0 h. However, there was no difference between never‐smoker, ever‐smoker, and COPD cells (data not shown).Apoptosis in fibroblasts from smokersTo determine if apoptosis may be playing a role in the phenotypic changes seen in the lung fibroblasts, the concentration of active Caspase‐3 under unstressed conditions was determined (Sano and Reed ). When examining cells from never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD subjects, we found that there was an increase in active Caspase‐3 in some of the COPD patients, although this increase in the group as a whole was not significant (P = 0.28, Fig. ).Active Caspase‐3 in lung fibroblasts. Levels of active Caspase‐3 were measured in lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers (n = 3), ever‐smokers (n = 4), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients (n = 11). A nonsignificant increase in active Caspase‐3 was observed in some COPD patients, but not in never‐smokers or smokers. The line in each case represents the median value.DiscussionWe observed changes in the ER structure, Golgi size, and lysosome distribution in lung fibroblasts from COPD patients as opposed to the ever‐smokers and never‐smokers. In addition, we showed that fibroblasts from COPD patients were more sensitive to chemical stressors known to induce the ER stress response.Stress is a physiological condition that all cells encounter at one point or another. We set out to examine if fibroblasts from COPD patients were more affected by the stress of continuous and prolonged smoking as opposed to their nonsmoking or non‐COPD counter parts. We found that even though fibroblasts show phenotypical differences in internal membranes among never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD patients, this phenotypic change did not inhibit their ability to respond to the ER stress response.Not surprisingly, as the ER became less reticulated and more clusters and dotty structures were observed in COPD, the Golgi decreased in size as compared to the nuclear size. This change in Golgi size may point to a defect in protein trafficking from the ER to the Golgi complex. Likewise, a phenotypic change in the lysosomes of COPD patients was observed and the lysosomes present appeared smaller and/or less numerous than in never‐smokers or ever‐smokers, though this was difficult to quantify due to the difference in phenotypes among the three groups. For example, the clustered lysosome phenotype seen in ever‐smokers made distinguishing individual lysosomes extremely difficult for quantification purposes. These results would again suggest that there may be a defect in protein trafficking throughout the cell, resulting in less protein reaching their intended destination or less protein being transported overall. As fibroblasts are responsible for production and delivery of extracellular matrix components (Westergren‐Thorsson et al. ), the trafficking and/or composition of extracellular matrix proteins could be an interesting avenue for future research. Future studies to examine the trafficking dynamics of proteins traveling through the endocytic pathway would be crucial in better understanding of how the endomembrane system is affected in COPD patients.The time course experiments were used to address the question: were fibroblasts from COPD patients able to be stressed and react in a manner similar to their non‐COPD counterparts? Some of the most obvious changes were observed in the Golgi and lysosomes of ever‐smokers and COPD patients. Drugs such as DTT and tunicamycin lead to unfolded and unmodified proteins that then need to be degraded or else they could be improperly trafficked in the cell (Schonthal ). In all subject groups, the lysosomes appear more perinuclear after addition of those drugs. This could perhaps be a cellular response to allow for accumulated proteins to be more quickly degraded in the lysosome. In both ever‐smokers and COPD patients, the lysosomes also appear to be morphologically larger than in controls, but this observation would have to be further quantified. An increase in lysosome size may also support increased degradation of proteins. Similarly, the Golgi collapsing into a ball‐like structure, could be the result of less proteins trafficking through the endocytic pathway. From our phenotypical study of stress to the endomembrane system, it appears that the Golgi is one of the most vulnerable organelles to stress. Further studies into specific trafficking of proteins could give more insight into how the Golgi responds to ER stress in the fibroblasts.Previous studies on cellular stress in lung cells focused primarily on epithelial cells (Kuwano ; Geraghty et al. ; Ribeiro and O'Neal ; Somborac‐Bacura et al. ). Although epithelial cells are indeed the first line of defense against external stressors, the fibroblasts are one of the main extracellular matrix producers in the lungs and therefore of potential impact in the context of COPD development (Westergren‐Thorsson et al. ). To our knowledge, this is the first study of ER stress in human airway fibroblasts in response to stress.Although we now know that fibroblasts from ever‐smokers and COPD patients are able to still respond to different forms of endoplasmic reticulum stress, it is still unclear exactly what the differences in phenotypes mean. Furthermore, we do not know how the cells would respond to an acute response such as addition of cigarette smoke extract. This would be an interesting area of interest for future studies.Previous studies have focused on established cell lines (Somborac‐Bacura et al. ) or mouse experiments (Geraghty et al. ; Kenche et al. ; Lee et al. ), whereas we have used primary lung fibroblasts grown out from patient biopsies. These biopsies were taken and cells were cultured for several weeks before experiments were performed. Conditions such as this may affect the way in which the cells respond to stress as opposed to using fresh cells and an acute response. This may explain why we only see minor difference in ER stress response in our fibroblasts.Regardless, we are able to see subtle, though nonsignificant differences among the different groups when it comes to the monitoring of ER stress response genes. In our study, we used four different genes known to be induced upon ER stress response although several other genes could have been used. BiP/GRP78, HERPUD1, ERP72, and WARS are common reporter genes for ER stress response (Samali et al. ; Oslowski and Urano ; Schwarz and Blower ). These genes represent proteins needed to aid in the restoration of homeostasis to the cell and mark a functional representation of the IRE1 and ATF6 branches of the ER stress response pathways. In most subjects, that is never‐smokers, ever‐smokers and COPD patients, there was an upregulation of ER stress response genes after addition of the stressors compared to baseline. In addition, ERP72 showed a different stress response between the different subject groups, suggesting that there is an altered response to stress in smoking COPD patients. Due to limited amount of material, we were unable to examine all the possible genes associated with ER stress and chose, instead, to focus on the genes often used to monitor stress response (Samali et al. ,b; Oslowski and Urano ).Additionally, the IRE1 arm of the ER stress response pathway was monitored by XBP1 splicing (Cao and Kaufman ), which appeared normal among the three groups of subjects in this study and XBP1 splicing was not observed under nonstress conditions (data not shown). The absence of an activated ER stress response under normal, nonstress conditions, indicates that despite the phenotypical changes to the endomembrane system, the signals for ER stress are not substantially activated. We did find, however, that when cells were dosed with stressors known to activate ER stress, all cells responded, regardless of subject group. Thus, despite seemingly chronic oxidative stress from cigarette smoking, COPD fibroblasts could activate the ER stress response at least as readily as their never‐smoking counterparts.Even though there seemed to be internal membrane changes in COPD patient fibroblasts, we could not define an overall significant induction of apoptosis. If cellular stress cannot be alleviated, it is possible that this will trigger apoptosis in the cell (Sano and Reed ). We found that in some patients there was an increase in the amount of active Caspase‐3 under unstressed conditions, but this varied widely in COPD patients (Fig. ).The ever‐smokers and COPD patients were age‐matched, but the never‐smokers were slightly younger. This is a limitation of the study, but we believe that this is of only minor significance since most stress results depicted the ever‐smokers to be an intermediate between the never‐smokers and the age‐matched COPD patients. This is also a small observational study with only a small number of included subjects, nevertheless, these observations point to interesting new areas of COPD research on the molecular level.We have begun to characterize an interesting cellular phenotype in central airway fibroblasts from never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD subjects; however, additional experimentation in regards to intracellular structure should be an avenue for future research. Previous studies using murine models have looked via electron microscopy into various cells from the lung (Mahavadi et al. ; Yu et al. ; Liu et al. ). Though, these studies did not include an in‐depth look into the different membrane structures. Mahavadi and colleagues used an antiarrhythmis drug reported to cause lung fibrosis in order to examine ER and lysosomal stress in the lung (Mahavadi et al. ). Using transmission electron microscopy to examine alveolar areas, they likened their images to those seen in Hermansky Pudluk syndrome (HPS), which is a disease caused by protein trafficking defects, something that might explain our disorganized endomembrane phenotypes. Different irritants have also been examined in the lung at the ultrastuctural level in terms of ER stress (Oh and Lim ; Yu et al. ). In both studies, swelling/ballooning of the ER in cultured normal human fibroblasts or lung tissue from mouse was observed in response to the stressor (Oh and Lim ; Yu et al. ). In addition, in a rat smoking model of COPD (Liu et al. ), it has been observed by scanning electron microscopy that the rats in the smoking COPD model, as compared to the control animals, had an expanded ER. This finding may show a similar phenotype to what we have seen in our COPD patients. Additionally, transmission electron microscopy has been used to explore the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in mild‐moderate COPD patients (Behzad et al. ). Although this study more focused on epithelial‐fibroblast contacts and the architecture in the lung, it would be interesting to look more in depth into fibroblasts in the context of the whole lung and not merely in vitro. Additionally, ultrastructural evaluation of the examined subjects would allow us to more accurately assess the level of disorganization in various endomembrane systems as we have observed alternations to all of these compartments in our study. It would be of great interest to determine how the internal structure is altered by electron microscopy and compare it to our findings by fluorescence microscopy.In conclusion, we have found that ER, Golgi, and lysosomes in lung fibroblasts from COPD patients differ from those of never‐smokers and ever‐smokers. These changes suggest that protein trafficking through the COPD cells might be affected. In addition, difference in the phenotypical and genetic upregulation of stress response was most prominent in fibroblasts from most COPD patients. This demonstrates that the prolonged exposure to oxidative stress, such as that suggested to occur with cigarette smoke, may permanently alter the physical makeup of proteins within these organelles.AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank the staff at the Lung Research Unit at Region Skåne hospital for excellent patient inclusion. We would also like to acknowledge Freja Åkerlund and Saga Jönsson for experimental assistance.Conflict of InterestNone of the authors have any conflict of interest.ReferencesBehzad, A. R., J. E. McDonough, N. Seyednejad, J. C. Hogg, and D. C. Walker. 2009. The disruption of the epithelial mesenchymal trophic unit in COPD. COPD 6:421–431.Cao, S. S., and R. J. Kaufman. 2014. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in cell fate decision and human disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 21:396–413.Cawley, K., S. Deegan, A. Samali, and S. Gupta. 2011. Assays for detecting the unfolded protein response. Methods Enzymol. 490:31–51.Geraghty, P., A. Wallace, and J. M. D'Armiento. 2011. Induction of the unfolded protein response by cigarette smoke is primarily an activating transcription factor 4‐C/EBP homologous protein mediated process. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 6:309–319.Huang, W. C., Y. S. Lin, C. L. Chen, C. Y. Wang, W. H. Chiu, and C. F. Lin. 2009. Glycogen synthase kinase‐3beta mediates endoplasmic reticulum stress‐induced lysosomal apoptosis in leukemia. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 329:524–531.Jiang, H., J. Zou, H. Zhang, W. Fu, T. Zeng, H. Huang, et al. 2015. Unfolded protein response inducers tunicamycin and dithiothreitol promote myeloma cell differentiation mediated by XBP‐1. Clin. Exp. Med. 15:85–96.Kenche, H., C. J. Baty, K. Vedagiri, S. D. Shapiro, and A. Blumental‐Perry. 2013. Cigarette smoking affects oxidative protein folding in endoplasmic reticulum by modifying protein disulfide isomerase. FASEB J. 27:965–977.Kuwano, K. 2007. Epithelial cell apoptosis and lung remodeling. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 4:419–429.Lee, H., J. R. Park, E. J. Kim, W. J. Kim, S. H. Hong, S. M. Park, et al. 2016. Cigarette smoke‐mediated oxidative stress induces apoptosis via the MAPKs/STAT1 pathway in mouse lung fibroblasts. Toxicol. Lett. 240:140–148.Liu, X., C. Ma, X. Wang, W. Wang, Z. Li, X. Wang, et al. 2017. Hydrogen coadministration slows the development of COPD‐like lung disease in a cigarette smoke‐induced rat model. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 12:1309–1324.Mahavadi, P., I. Henneke, C. Ruppert, L. Knudsen, S. Venkatesan, G. Liebisch, et al. 2014. Altered surfactant homeostasis and alveolar epithelial cell stress in amiodarone‐induced lung fibrosis. Toxicol. Sci. 142:285–297.Oh, S. H., and S. C. Lim. 2009. Endoplasmic reticulum stress‐mediated autophagy/apoptosis induced by capsaicin (8‐methyl‐N‐vanillyl‐6‐nonenamide) and dihydrocapsaicin is regulated by the extent of c‐Jun NH2‐terminal kinase/extracellular signal‐regulated kinase activation in WI38 lung epithelial fibroblast cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 329:112–122.Oslowski, C. M., and F. Urano. 2011. Measuring ER stress and the unfolded protein response using mammalian tissue culture system. Methods Enzymol. 490:71–92.Ribeiro, C. M., and W. K. O'Neal. 2012. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in chronic obstructive lung diseases. Curr. Mol. Med. 12:872–882.Samali, A., U. Fitzgerald, S. Deegan, and S. Gupta. 2010a. Methods for monitoring endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2010:830307.Samali, A., S. Fulda, A. M. Gorman, O. Hori, and S. M. Srinivasula. 2010b. Cell stress and cell death. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2010:245803.Sano, R., and J. C. Reed. 2013. ER stress‐induced cell death mechanisms. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1833:3460–3470.Schonthal, A. H. 2012. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: its role in disease and novel prospects for therapy. Scientifica 2012:857516.Schwarz, D. S., and M. D. Blower. 2016. The endoplasmic reticulum: structure, function and response to cellular signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73:79–94.Somborac‐Bacura, A., M. van der Toorn, L. Franciosi, D. J. Slebos, T. Zanic‐Grubisic, R. Bischoff, et al. 2013. Cigarette smoke induces endoplasmic reticulum stress response and proteasomal dysfunction in human alveolar epithelial cells. Exp. Physiol. 98:316–325.Tuder, R. M., and I. Petrache. 2012. Pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Clin. Invest. 122:2749–2755.Tuder, R. M., I. Petrache, J. A. Elias, N. F. Voelkel, and P. M. Henson. 2003. Apoptosis and emphysema: the missing link. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 28:551–554.Tufvesson, E., K. Nihlberg, G. Westergren‐Thorsson, and L. Bjermer. 2011. Leukotriene receptors are differently expressed in fibroblast from peripheral versus central airways in asthmatics and healthy controls. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 85:67–73.Tufvesson, E., C. Andersson, J. Weidner, J. S. Erjefalt, and L. Bjermer. 2017. Inducible nitric oxide synthase expression is increased in the alveolar compartment of asthmatic patients. Allergy 72:627–635.Weidner, J., L. Jarenback, K. de Jong, M. van den Berge, C.‐A. Brandsma, J. Vonk, et al. 2017. Sulfatase modifying factor 1 (SUMF1) is associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Respir. Res. 18:77.Westergren‐Thorsson, G., K. Larsen, K. Nihlberg, A. Andersson‐Sjoland, O. Hallgren, G. Marko‐Varga, et al. 2010. Pathological airway remodelling in inflammation. Clin. Respir. J. 4(Suppl 1):1–8.Yu, K. N., S. H. Chang, S. J. Park, J. Lim, J. Lee, T. J. Yoon, et al. 2015. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce endoplasmic reticulum stress‐mediated autophagic cell death via mitochondria‐associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane disruption in normal lung cells. PLoS ONE 10:e0131208. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physiological Reports Wiley

Endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, and lysosomes are disorganized in lung fibroblasts from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/endoplasmic-reticulum-golgi-and-lysosomes-are-disorganized-in-lung-663hsweOhV

References (31)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2018 Published by the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society
ISSN
2051-817X
eISSN
2051-817X
DOI
10.14814/phy2.13584
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

IntroductionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death world‐wide. Although the disease can be developed via a variety of different factors, such as occupational, environmental, and genetic alterations, the most prevalent cause of COPD is cigarette smoking (Tuder and Petrache ). It has been shown that cigarette smoking causes oxidative stress to the cells of the lungs (Tuder et al. ).Stress is also a natural occurring incidence for all cells in the body. Whether this stress is due to a foreign chemical, heat stress, starvation, or oxidative stress, the cell must be able to quickly adapt to its current situation or else die. In order to adapt to stressors, signaling pathways in eukaryotic cells are initiated that allow for a cascade of genes and proteins to be activated, with the ultimate goal to be maintenance of homeostasis (Cao and Kaufman ; Schwarz and Blower ).The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a central component in eukaryotic cells, responsible for protein translation, folding, and transport (Schwarz and Blower ). It is a continuous membrane system consisting of tubules and sheets that begin at the nuclear membrane and extend throughout the cell. Despite its structure, the ER is a dynamic organelle that continuously changes based on the state of the cell, and is at the beginning of the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Proteins are translated in the ER, where they can then be modified and packaged into vesicles bound for the Golgi complex. Through the Golgi, transported proteins can be further modified before sorting to their final localization at the lysosome or plasma membrane where the proteins function.Due to its important and central role in the cell, the ER has several mechanisms to ensure that homeostasis is maintained. The ER stress response activates a cascade of signals that allows the cell to respond to unwanted stressors (Cao and Kaufman ). In eukaryotic cells, there are three major ER stress pathways that detect increased levels of unfolded proteins indicative of cellular stress. The three branches of the ER stress response pathway include via inositol requiring enzyme‐1 (IRE1), protein kinase‐like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), which activate the upregulation of different genes involved in coping with the ER stress response and restoring homeostasis to the cell (Sano and Reed ).Short‐term studies in mice on the oxidative stress present in the lungs have been examined (Geraghty et al. ; Kenche et al. ; Lee et al. ), but little is known about how long‐term smoking affects the cells of the lung, for example as in COPD, and if ER stress response is maintained when under continuous oxidative stress.We aimed to examine if the endomembrane pathway was altered in patients with COPD as opposed to never‐smokers or healthy ever‐smokers. By using lung fibroblasts from these three subject groups, we observed the phenotypes of the endomembrane system under stressed and unstressed conditions. Furthermore, gene expression of four different genes previously stated to be induced under stress conditions (Oslowski and Urano ) was measured. Finally, we aimed to examine changes in active Caspase‐3 levels to determine if apoptosis was affected in these cells.Materials and MethodsSubjectsMaterial from a total of six healthy never‐smokers, four healthy ever‐smokers, and fifteen COPD patients was used in the different experiments in this study (Table ). COPD patients were defined according to the GOLD criteria (FEV1/FVC < 0.7). The subjects underwent bronchoscopy and central airway lung biopsies were obtained. Fibroblasts were grown out from biopsies in Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum as previously described (Tufvesson et al. ). Cells were harvested for analysis at passages 3–6. All subjects signed written informed consent and the study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board in Lund.Subject characteristicsNever‐smokers (n = 6)Ever‐smokers (n = 4)COPD (n = 15)Gender (Female/Male)4/22/26/9Age (years)50 (42–57)66 (65–67)65 (60–70)Smoking status (current/former)0/00/48/7Pack years027 (23–33)40 (27–45)FEV1 (L)3.44 (3.20–3.56)2.97 (2.21–3.60)1.63 (1.44–2.18)FEV1 (%p)114 (95–139)91 (89–96)55 (47–65)FEV1/FVC0.84 (0.81–0.88)0.79 (0.75–0.82)0.49 (0.44–0.55)Induction of ER stressTime course experiments were performed over six hours. Fibroblasts were grown to confluency in six well plates for subsequent RNA extraction and qPCR analysis or in chambered slides for immunofluorescence staining. DMEM (supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum) containing: Tunicamycin (5 μg/mL), Thapsagargin (1μM), Brefeldin A (50 μmol/L), dithiothreitol (DTT, 1 mmol/L), or controls of EtOH (0.01%) or 1 × Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) were added to the cells for detecting the unfolded protein response (Samali et al. ; Cawley et al. ). After 0 or 6 h, cells were washed once with 1 × PBS. Cells in plates were then harvested for RNA analyses according to the Promega RNA Cell extraction kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and cells in chamber slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Histolab Products AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) for immunofluorescence staining.RNA extraction and qPCR analysisRNA was also extracted from fibroblasts before and after addition of ER stress inducing chemicals (as described above). cDNA synthesis and quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR) was performed as described previously (Tufvesson et al. ; Weidner et al. ). All BiP, HERPUD1, ERP72, and WARS mRNA expression was normalized against expression of the reference genes β‐Actin and GAPDH (for primer sequences see Table ).Primer sequencesPrimer nameSequenceβ‐Actin5′ AGC ACA GAG CCT CGC CTT T3′ GGA ATC CTT CTG ACC CAT GCGAPDH5′ GAA GGT GAA GGT CGG AGT CA3′ TGG AGG ATG GTG ATG GGA TTGRP78/BiP5′ TAG CGT ATG GTG CTG CTG TC3′ TTT GTC AGG GGT CTT TCA CCHERPUD15′ ACT TGC TTC CAA AGC AGG AA3′ CCC TTT GCC TTA AAC CAT CAERP725′ CAT CAA GGA CTT CGT GCT GA3′ TTC ACC TCC CCA GCA TAG TCWARS5′ CAC CCC TGA TTG GAC AGT CT3′ TGG AAG ACA CTG CAG AGG TGImmunofluorescence and microscopyThe staining procedure was performed as described previously (Tufvesson et al. ). Briefly, cells were rinsed with 1 × PBS and fixed with 4% PFA and rinsed before addition of permeabilization buffer (PBSTw; 1 × PBS; 1% Tween20) and blocked with blocking buffer (2% normal goat serum (NGS; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in PBSTw). Cells were then incubated with various primary antibodies in blocking buffer. Cells were washed with PBSTw and incubated with fluorescently coupled secondary antibodies in blocking buffer. Cells were washed with 1× PBS and incubated with 30 nmol/L DAPI (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and rinsed in water before the addition of Dako mounting solution (DAKO, Glostup, Denmark) and a coverslip. Slides were stored in a dark, moist chamber at 4°C until observation. Microscopy was performed using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with an Olympus DP80 camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and a Nikon Plan Apo 40×/0.95 objective. Images were obtained with CellSens Dimension (Olympus) and processed in ImageJ software (U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).AntibodiesPrimary antibodies used included: protein disulfide isomerase (PDI, mouse anti‐human (Prod# MA3019); 1:250, Life Technologies), golgin‐97 (rabbit anti‐human (Prod #A21270); conc. 1:100, Life Technologies), and lysosomal‐associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1, mouse anti‐human (ab25630); 1:100, Abcam Cambridge, MA). Secondary antibodies were: AlexaFluor488 (anti‐mouse (IgG1), conc. 1:750), AlexaFluor555 (anti‐mouse(IgG2a), conc. 1:750), and AlexaFluor647 (anti‐rabbit, conc. 1:750), all from Life Technologies.Active Caspase‐3 assayCells were grown to confluency in six well plates and processed and analyzed according to the protocol of the human Active Caspase‐3 Quantikine ELISA kit used (KM300, R&Dsystems, Minneapolis, MN).StatisticsData were analyzed using Prism 5 software (Graphpad, La Jolla, CA) and used as described in the figure legends. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test was used for analyses among several groups, and followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test for comparison between separate groups.ResultsEndoplasmic reticulum is disorganized in COPD patientsIn order to assess the effects caused by long‐term cigarette smoking on the internal membrane systems in the cell, we obtained lung fibroblasts from healthy never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD patients. We found the ER structure to be disorganized in COPD patients. Never‐smoking and ever‐smoking subjects had a reticulated network as was expected, but COPD patients showed a more clustered, punctate structure to varying degrees (Fig. A). To determine the level of disorganization seen in each patient, the number of cells showing reticulated, dotty, clustered, or a combination of the phenotypes were observed (Fig. B) and a minimum of 200 cells per subject group were counted. There was a significant difference between never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD patients (Fig. C), with a lower proportion of fibroblasts with reticulated ER in COPD patients (P = 0.0006) and instead a higher proportion of fibroblasts with clustered ER (P = 0.007) or the combination of dotty and clustered ER (P = 0.044), while the proportion of fibroblasts with a dotty phenotype was not significantly different (P = 0.19).The endoplasmic reticulum is disorganized in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) lung fibroblasts. Representative images of lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers and ever‐smokers are shown along with three different COPD patients. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER; white) appears more disorganized in COPD patients with a more dotty and patchy structure versus the more reticulated structure shown in never‐smokers and ever‐smokers (A). The nuclei are shown in blue. Phenotypes of the different ER structures (B) were counted and compared (C) for never‐smokers (n = 5), ever‐smokers (n = 5), and COPD patients (n = 12). Scale bar equals 20 μm. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 showing significant differences among the subject groups in the proportion of the respective cell phenotypes.Golgi and lysosomes are altered in COPD patientsDue to the alterations seen in the ER of COPD patient lung fibroblasts, we examined other organelles in the endomembrane system. We found that in COPD patients, the size of the Golgi, as compared to the nucleus, was altered in lung fibroblasts as compared to never‐smokers or ever‐smokers, but not significant (P = 0.087, Fig. A–C).Golgi are altered in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) lung fibroblasts. Representative images of Golgi in lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and three COPD patients are presented. The structure of the Golgi (white), overall, remained unchanged among the three groups (A), but measurements comparing Golgi size to nucleus size (C) showed a reduction in COPD patients (n = 10) compared to never‐smokers (n = 5) and ever‐smokers (n = 5). (C). Cells from (A) were enlarged to better show Golgi structure (B). Nuclei are shown in blue. Scale bar equals 20 μm.Furthermore, the lysosomes also had a different appearance. In never‐smokers, the lysosomes appeared numerous and found throughout the full‐length of the cell, whereas in ever‐smokers, the lysosomes were more clustered around the cell nucleus (Fig. ). In COPD patients, lysosomes were spread throughout the cell, but did not seem as numerous as in never‐smokers.Lysosome distribution is changed in lung fibroblasts from smokers. Lysosomes (white) were examined in the three groups. In never‐smokers, lysosomes appeared distributed throughout the cell, more perinuclear in ever‐smokers, and dispersed, but less numerous in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients. Nuclei are shown in blue. Scale bar equals 20 μm.Internal membranes are altered in COPD patients under stress conditionsDue to the changes in the endomembrane system in COPD patients under normal culture conditions, we investigated if these cells would be sensitive to chemical stressors known to induce the ER stress response (Samali et al. ; Fig. ).Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress induces changes in internal membranes. Time course experiments were performed in lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients with different ER stress‐inducing chemicals. Representative images of each subject and the control (A) or chemical treatments: DTT (B), tunicamycin (C), thapsigargin (D), and Brefeldin A (E) are shown. The ER (cyan), Golgi (magenta), lysosomes (yellow), and nuclei (blue) are depicted. Scale bar equals 20 μm.Under DTT stress, which results in unfolded proteins through the reduction of disulfide bonds (Jiang et al. ), we observed that fibroblasts from never‐smokers appeared to exhibit a change in the Golgi complex where it appeared to collapse into a ball‐like structure in the perinuclear region. This phenomenon was not readily observed in ever‐smokers or COPD patients (Fig. B).Under stress from tunicamycin (Schonthal ), an inhibitor of N‐linked glycosylation (Huang et al. ), lysosomes appeared to change. In all cases, lysosomes appeared to cluster in a more perinuclear pattern. In ever‐smokers and COPD subjects, lysosomes also appear a bit more clustered, with larger patches occurring (Fig. C).Thapsigargin (Schonthal ) is used to inhibit the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase. Treatment with thapsigargin resulted in COPD cells that were observed to have more spread out lysosomes, appearing throughout the cell, unlike their never‐smoker or ever‐smoker counterparts, which showed a tendency for perinuclear clustering (Fig. D).Finally, Brefeldin A is known to disrupt the Golgi complex (Samali et al. ) and this was observed in all cells. In both ever‐smokers and COPD patients, though, the appearance of lysosomes was less pronounced than in cells from never‐smokers (Fig. E).Expression of ER stress‐induced genes in COPD patientsSince we observed phenotypic differences in never‐smoker, ever‐smoker, and COPD cells, we also investigated whether there were also changes in expression of genes induced under the ER stress, i.e., BiP, HERPUD1, ERP72, and WARS (Samali et al. ), before and after addition of a stressor (fold change in expression compared to baseline is presented in Fig. ). Overall, in most subjects there was an upregulation of ER stress response genes after addition of stressor compared to baseline, i.e., the fold change is >1 (Fig. ). In addition, significant differences in stress response were seen between never‐smoker, ever‐smoker, and COPD cells in ERP72 under stress by Brefeldin A and thapsigargin (Fig. C). No significant changes were observed in BiP, HERPUD1, or WARS expression after any stressor.Changes of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress gene expression in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) lung fibroblasts. The fold change of ER stress gene mRNA (the change between 0 and 6 h time point) in lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers (n = 5), ever‐smokers (n = 4), and COPD patients (n = 12) after ER stressors (DTT, tunicamycin, thapsagargin, and Brefeldin A) are presented. No major change in gene expression of BiP (A), HERPUD1 (B), or WARS (D) among the different subject types or chemical stressors was observed. Nonsignificant changes to ERP72 were observed with DTT and tunicamycin, but changes among the groups were observed in thapsigargin and Brefeldin A (C). The line in each case represents the median value. KW = Kruskal–Wallis, D = Dunn's multiple comparison test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.Additionally, we examined splicing of XBP1 mRNA, which is induced upon ER stress (Cao and Kaufman ). mRNA from all subjects was analyzed at both 0 and 6 h during the time course. We observed XBP1 splicing at 6 h in all cells in which chemical stressors were applied, but no splicing in any cells at 0 h. However, there was no difference between never‐smoker, ever‐smoker, and COPD cells (data not shown).Apoptosis in fibroblasts from smokersTo determine if apoptosis may be playing a role in the phenotypic changes seen in the lung fibroblasts, the concentration of active Caspase‐3 under unstressed conditions was determined (Sano and Reed ). When examining cells from never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD subjects, we found that there was an increase in active Caspase‐3 in some of the COPD patients, although this increase in the group as a whole was not significant (P = 0.28, Fig. ).Active Caspase‐3 in lung fibroblasts. Levels of active Caspase‐3 were measured in lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers (n = 3), ever‐smokers (n = 4), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients (n = 11). A nonsignificant increase in active Caspase‐3 was observed in some COPD patients, but not in never‐smokers or smokers. The line in each case represents the median value.DiscussionWe observed changes in the ER structure, Golgi size, and lysosome distribution in lung fibroblasts from COPD patients as opposed to the ever‐smokers and never‐smokers. In addition, we showed that fibroblasts from COPD patients were more sensitive to chemical stressors known to induce the ER stress response.Stress is a physiological condition that all cells encounter at one point or another. We set out to examine if fibroblasts from COPD patients were more affected by the stress of continuous and prolonged smoking as opposed to their nonsmoking or non‐COPD counter parts. We found that even though fibroblasts show phenotypical differences in internal membranes among never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD patients, this phenotypic change did not inhibit their ability to respond to the ER stress response.Not surprisingly, as the ER became less reticulated and more clusters and dotty structures were observed in COPD, the Golgi decreased in size as compared to the nuclear size. This change in Golgi size may point to a defect in protein trafficking from the ER to the Golgi complex. Likewise, a phenotypic change in the lysosomes of COPD patients was observed and the lysosomes present appeared smaller and/or less numerous than in never‐smokers or ever‐smokers, though this was difficult to quantify due to the difference in phenotypes among the three groups. For example, the clustered lysosome phenotype seen in ever‐smokers made distinguishing individual lysosomes extremely difficult for quantification purposes. These results would again suggest that there may be a defect in protein trafficking throughout the cell, resulting in less protein reaching their intended destination or less protein being transported overall. As fibroblasts are responsible for production and delivery of extracellular matrix components (Westergren‐Thorsson et al. ), the trafficking and/or composition of extracellular matrix proteins could be an interesting avenue for future research. Future studies to examine the trafficking dynamics of proteins traveling through the endocytic pathway would be crucial in better understanding of how the endomembrane system is affected in COPD patients.The time course experiments were used to address the question: were fibroblasts from COPD patients able to be stressed and react in a manner similar to their non‐COPD counterparts? Some of the most obvious changes were observed in the Golgi and lysosomes of ever‐smokers and COPD patients. Drugs such as DTT and tunicamycin lead to unfolded and unmodified proteins that then need to be degraded or else they could be improperly trafficked in the cell (Schonthal ). In all subject groups, the lysosomes appear more perinuclear after addition of those drugs. This could perhaps be a cellular response to allow for accumulated proteins to be more quickly degraded in the lysosome. In both ever‐smokers and COPD patients, the lysosomes also appear to be morphologically larger than in controls, but this observation would have to be further quantified. An increase in lysosome size may also support increased degradation of proteins. Similarly, the Golgi collapsing into a ball‐like structure, could be the result of less proteins trafficking through the endocytic pathway. From our phenotypical study of stress to the endomembrane system, it appears that the Golgi is one of the most vulnerable organelles to stress. Further studies into specific trafficking of proteins could give more insight into how the Golgi responds to ER stress in the fibroblasts.Previous studies on cellular stress in lung cells focused primarily on epithelial cells (Kuwano ; Geraghty et al. ; Ribeiro and O'Neal ; Somborac‐Bacura et al. ). Although epithelial cells are indeed the first line of defense against external stressors, the fibroblasts are one of the main extracellular matrix producers in the lungs and therefore of potential impact in the context of COPD development (Westergren‐Thorsson et al. ). To our knowledge, this is the first study of ER stress in human airway fibroblasts in response to stress.Although we now know that fibroblasts from ever‐smokers and COPD patients are able to still respond to different forms of endoplasmic reticulum stress, it is still unclear exactly what the differences in phenotypes mean. Furthermore, we do not know how the cells would respond to an acute response such as addition of cigarette smoke extract. This would be an interesting area of interest for future studies.Previous studies have focused on established cell lines (Somborac‐Bacura et al. ) or mouse experiments (Geraghty et al. ; Kenche et al. ; Lee et al. ), whereas we have used primary lung fibroblasts grown out from patient biopsies. These biopsies were taken and cells were cultured for several weeks before experiments were performed. Conditions such as this may affect the way in which the cells respond to stress as opposed to using fresh cells and an acute response. This may explain why we only see minor difference in ER stress response in our fibroblasts.Regardless, we are able to see subtle, though nonsignificant differences among the different groups when it comes to the monitoring of ER stress response genes. In our study, we used four different genes known to be induced upon ER stress response although several other genes could have been used. BiP/GRP78, HERPUD1, ERP72, and WARS are common reporter genes for ER stress response (Samali et al. ; Oslowski and Urano ; Schwarz and Blower ). These genes represent proteins needed to aid in the restoration of homeostasis to the cell and mark a functional representation of the IRE1 and ATF6 branches of the ER stress response pathways. In most subjects, that is never‐smokers, ever‐smokers and COPD patients, there was an upregulation of ER stress response genes after addition of the stressors compared to baseline. In addition, ERP72 showed a different stress response between the different subject groups, suggesting that there is an altered response to stress in smoking COPD patients. Due to limited amount of material, we were unable to examine all the possible genes associated with ER stress and chose, instead, to focus on the genes often used to monitor stress response (Samali et al. ,b; Oslowski and Urano ).Additionally, the IRE1 arm of the ER stress response pathway was monitored by XBP1 splicing (Cao and Kaufman ), which appeared normal among the three groups of subjects in this study and XBP1 splicing was not observed under nonstress conditions (data not shown). The absence of an activated ER stress response under normal, nonstress conditions, indicates that despite the phenotypical changes to the endomembrane system, the signals for ER stress are not substantially activated. We did find, however, that when cells were dosed with stressors known to activate ER stress, all cells responded, regardless of subject group. Thus, despite seemingly chronic oxidative stress from cigarette smoking, COPD fibroblasts could activate the ER stress response at least as readily as their never‐smoking counterparts.Even though there seemed to be internal membrane changes in COPD patient fibroblasts, we could not define an overall significant induction of apoptosis. If cellular stress cannot be alleviated, it is possible that this will trigger apoptosis in the cell (Sano and Reed ). We found that in some patients there was an increase in the amount of active Caspase‐3 under unstressed conditions, but this varied widely in COPD patients (Fig. ).The ever‐smokers and COPD patients were age‐matched, but the never‐smokers were slightly younger. This is a limitation of the study, but we believe that this is of only minor significance since most stress results depicted the ever‐smokers to be an intermediate between the never‐smokers and the age‐matched COPD patients. This is also a small observational study with only a small number of included subjects, nevertheless, these observations point to interesting new areas of COPD research on the molecular level.We have begun to characterize an interesting cellular phenotype in central airway fibroblasts from never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and COPD subjects; however, additional experimentation in regards to intracellular structure should be an avenue for future research. Previous studies using murine models have looked via electron microscopy into various cells from the lung (Mahavadi et al. ; Yu et al. ; Liu et al. ). Though, these studies did not include an in‐depth look into the different membrane structures. Mahavadi and colleagues used an antiarrhythmis drug reported to cause lung fibrosis in order to examine ER and lysosomal stress in the lung (Mahavadi et al. ). Using transmission electron microscopy to examine alveolar areas, they likened their images to those seen in Hermansky Pudluk syndrome (HPS), which is a disease caused by protein trafficking defects, something that might explain our disorganized endomembrane phenotypes. Different irritants have also been examined in the lung at the ultrastuctural level in terms of ER stress (Oh and Lim ; Yu et al. ). In both studies, swelling/ballooning of the ER in cultured normal human fibroblasts or lung tissue from mouse was observed in response to the stressor (Oh and Lim ; Yu et al. ). In addition, in a rat smoking model of COPD (Liu et al. ), it has been observed by scanning electron microscopy that the rats in the smoking COPD model, as compared to the control animals, had an expanded ER. This finding may show a similar phenotype to what we have seen in our COPD patients. Additionally, transmission electron microscopy has been used to explore the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in mild‐moderate COPD patients (Behzad et al. ). Although this study more focused on epithelial‐fibroblast contacts and the architecture in the lung, it would be interesting to look more in depth into fibroblasts in the context of the whole lung and not merely in vitro. Additionally, ultrastructural evaluation of the examined subjects would allow us to more accurately assess the level of disorganization in various endomembrane systems as we have observed alternations to all of these compartments in our study. It would be of great interest to determine how the internal structure is altered by electron microscopy and compare it to our findings by fluorescence microscopy.In conclusion, we have found that ER, Golgi, and lysosomes in lung fibroblasts from COPD patients differ from those of never‐smokers and ever‐smokers. These changes suggest that protein trafficking through the COPD cells might be affected. In addition, difference in the phenotypical and genetic upregulation of stress response was most prominent in fibroblasts from most COPD patients. This demonstrates that the prolonged exposure to oxidative stress, such as that suggested to occur with cigarette smoke, may permanently alter the physical makeup of proteins within these organelles.AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank the staff at the Lung Research Unit at Region Skåne hospital for excellent patient inclusion. We would also like to acknowledge Freja Åkerlund and Saga Jönsson for experimental assistance.Conflict of InterestNone of the authors have any conflict of interest.ReferencesBehzad, A. R., J. E. McDonough, N. Seyednejad, J. C. Hogg, and D. C. Walker. 2009. The disruption of the epithelial mesenchymal trophic unit in COPD. COPD 6:421–431.Cao, S. S., and R. J. Kaufman. 2014. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in cell fate decision and human disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 21:396–413.Cawley, K., S. Deegan, A. Samali, and S. Gupta. 2011. Assays for detecting the unfolded protein response. Methods Enzymol. 490:31–51.Geraghty, P., A. Wallace, and J. M. D'Armiento. 2011. Induction of the unfolded protein response by cigarette smoke is primarily an activating transcription factor 4‐C/EBP homologous protein mediated process. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 6:309–319.Huang, W. C., Y. S. Lin, C. L. Chen, C. Y. Wang, W. H. Chiu, and C. F. Lin. 2009. Glycogen synthase kinase‐3beta mediates endoplasmic reticulum stress‐induced lysosomal apoptosis in leukemia. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 329:524–531.Jiang, H., J. Zou, H. Zhang, W. Fu, T. Zeng, H. Huang, et al. 2015. Unfolded protein response inducers tunicamycin and dithiothreitol promote myeloma cell differentiation mediated by XBP‐1. Clin. Exp. Med. 15:85–96.Kenche, H., C. J. Baty, K. Vedagiri, S. D. Shapiro, and A. Blumental‐Perry. 2013. Cigarette smoking affects oxidative protein folding in endoplasmic reticulum by modifying protein disulfide isomerase. FASEB J. 27:965–977.Kuwano, K. 2007. Epithelial cell apoptosis and lung remodeling. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 4:419–429.Lee, H., J. R. Park, E. J. Kim, W. J. Kim, S. H. Hong, S. M. Park, et al. 2016. Cigarette smoke‐mediated oxidative stress induces apoptosis via the MAPKs/STAT1 pathway in mouse lung fibroblasts. Toxicol. Lett. 240:140–148.Liu, X., C. Ma, X. Wang, W. Wang, Z. Li, X. Wang, et al. 2017. Hydrogen coadministration slows the development of COPD‐like lung disease in a cigarette smoke‐induced rat model. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 12:1309–1324.Mahavadi, P., I. Henneke, C. Ruppert, L. Knudsen, S. Venkatesan, G. Liebisch, et al. 2014. Altered surfactant homeostasis and alveolar epithelial cell stress in amiodarone‐induced lung fibrosis. Toxicol. Sci. 142:285–297.Oh, S. H., and S. C. Lim. 2009. Endoplasmic reticulum stress‐mediated autophagy/apoptosis induced by capsaicin (8‐methyl‐N‐vanillyl‐6‐nonenamide) and dihydrocapsaicin is regulated by the extent of c‐Jun NH2‐terminal kinase/extracellular signal‐regulated kinase activation in WI38 lung epithelial fibroblast cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 329:112–122.Oslowski, C. M., and F. Urano. 2011. Measuring ER stress and the unfolded protein response using mammalian tissue culture system. Methods Enzymol. 490:71–92.Ribeiro, C. M., and W. K. O'Neal. 2012. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in chronic obstructive lung diseases. Curr. Mol. Med. 12:872–882.Samali, A., U. Fitzgerald, S. Deegan, and S. Gupta. 2010a. Methods for monitoring endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2010:830307.Samali, A., S. Fulda, A. M. Gorman, O. Hori, and S. M. Srinivasula. 2010b. Cell stress and cell death. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2010:245803.Sano, R., and J. C. Reed. 2013. ER stress‐induced cell death mechanisms. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1833:3460–3470.Schonthal, A. H. 2012. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: its role in disease and novel prospects for therapy. Scientifica 2012:857516.Schwarz, D. S., and M. D. Blower. 2016. The endoplasmic reticulum: structure, function and response to cellular signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73:79–94.Somborac‐Bacura, A., M. van der Toorn, L. Franciosi, D. J. Slebos, T. Zanic‐Grubisic, R. Bischoff, et al. 2013. Cigarette smoke induces endoplasmic reticulum stress response and proteasomal dysfunction in human alveolar epithelial cells. Exp. Physiol. 98:316–325.Tuder, R. M., and I. Petrache. 2012. Pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Clin. Invest. 122:2749–2755.Tuder, R. M., I. Petrache, J. A. Elias, N. F. Voelkel, and P. M. Henson. 2003. Apoptosis and emphysema: the missing link. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 28:551–554.Tufvesson, E., K. Nihlberg, G. Westergren‐Thorsson, and L. Bjermer. 2011. Leukotriene receptors are differently expressed in fibroblast from peripheral versus central airways in asthmatics and healthy controls. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 85:67–73.Tufvesson, E., C. Andersson, J. Weidner, J. S. Erjefalt, and L. Bjermer. 2017. Inducible nitric oxide synthase expression is increased in the alveolar compartment of asthmatic patients. Allergy 72:627–635.Weidner, J., L. Jarenback, K. de Jong, M. van den Berge, C.‐A. Brandsma, J. Vonk, et al. 2017. Sulfatase modifying factor 1 (SUMF1) is associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Respir. Res. 18:77.Westergren‐Thorsson, G., K. Larsen, K. Nihlberg, A. Andersson‐Sjoland, O. Hallgren, G. Marko‐Varga, et al. 2010. Pathological airway remodelling in inflammation. Clin. Respir. J. 4(Suppl 1):1–8.Yu, K. N., S. H. Chang, S. J. Park, J. Lim, J. Lee, T. J. Yoon, et al. 2015. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce endoplasmic reticulum stress‐mediated autophagic cell death via mitochondria‐associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane disruption in normal lung cells. PLoS ONE 10:e0131208.

Journal

Physiological Reports – Wiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

Keywords: ; ; ; ;

There are no references for this article.