Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Robinson, J. Fleming (1975)
A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF SONAR “CROWN‐RUMP LENGTH” MEASUREMENTSBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 82
A. Hall, J. Fleming (1974)
A timing calibration standard for ultrasonic equipmentBritish Journal of Radiology, 47
Horace Thompson, Joseph Holmes, K. Gottesfeld, E.Stewart Taylor (1965)
FETAL DEVELOPMENT AS DETERMINED BY ULTRASONIC PULSE ECHO TECHNIQUES.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 92
R. Thompson, R. Mellinger (1964)
The effects of clomiphene citrate in patients with pituitary-gonadal disorders.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 92
R. Lunt, T. Chard (1976)
A NEW METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT IN LATE PREGNANCY BY ULTRASONIC SCANNINGBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 83
S. Campbell, D. Wilkin (1975)
ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN THE ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHTBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 82
C. Lund (1958)
PREGNANCY AND HEART DISEASEClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1
S. Campbell, G. Newman (1971)
GROWTH OF THE FETAL BIPARIETAL DIAMETER DURING NORMAL PREGNANCYBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 78
Willocks Willocks, Donald Donald, Duggan Duggan (1964)
Foetal cephalometry by ultrasoundObstet Gynaec Br Commonw, 71
O. Piiroinen, K. Manninen (1971)
About the foetal cephalometry by ultrasound.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement, 9
I. Donald (1969)
Sonar as a method of studying prenatal development.The Journal of pediatrics, 75 2
E. Kohorn (1967)
An evaluation of ultrasonic fetal cephalometry.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 97 4
(1974)
A critical evaluation of the performance of ultrasonic diagnosis in present - day obstetrics
H. Robinson (1973)
Sonar Measurement of Fetal Crown-Rump Length as Means of Assessing Maturity in First Trimester of PregnancyBritish Medical Journal, 4
S. Campbell (1974)
Fetal growth.Clinics in obstetrics and gynaecology, 1 1
An electronic system for measuring area and perimeter directly on cross‐sectional ultrasonic images is described. The resulting values are unaffected by the distortions common to display monitors or errors in the display scale factor. The results of accuracy tests are given, including a comparison with measurements by planimeter and map‐measurer.
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1978
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.