Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems

Effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems This paper examines the effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems. We develop a framework that relates differences in strategic orientations and environmental conditions to four factors–availability of multiple options, programability of behavior, cause–effect ambiguity and outcome uncertainty. Hypotheses based on this framework are tested in a sample of 50 electric utility firms across two time periods covering a total of 10 years. Consistent with theory, we find that firms with more discretionary strategic orientations offer greater compensation, more outcome‐based compensation plans and greater proportion of outcome‐based cash compensation than firms with less discretionary strategic orientations. Similarly, high discretion environmental periods are associated with greater pay, more outcome‐based compensation plans and greater proportion of outcome‐based cash compensation than low discretion environmental periods. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Strategic Management Journal Wiley

Effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems

Strategic Management Journal , Volume 13 (S1) – Jun 1, 1992

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/effects-of-strategic-orientation-and-environmental-change-on-senior-m2tWb1qvRm

References (34)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN
0143-2095
eISSN
1097-0266
DOI
10.1002/smj.4250131010
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems. We develop a framework that relates differences in strategic orientations and environmental conditions to four factors–availability of multiple options, programability of behavior, cause–effect ambiguity and outcome uncertainty. Hypotheses based on this framework are tested in a sample of 50 electric utility firms across two time periods covering a total of 10 years. Consistent with theory, we find that firms with more discretionary strategic orientations offer greater compensation, more outcome‐based compensation plans and greater proportion of outcome‐based cash compensation than firms with less discretionary strategic orientations. Similarly, high discretion environmental periods are associated with greater pay, more outcome‐based compensation plans and greater proportion of outcome‐based cash compensation than low discretion environmental periods.

Journal

Strategic Management JournalWiley

Published: Jun 1, 1992

There are no references for this article.