Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Do we need land‐cover data to model species distributions in Europe?

Do we need land‐cover data to model species distributions in Europe? Aim To assess the influence of land cover and climate on species distributions across Europe. To quantify the importance of land cover to describe and predict species distributions after using climate as the main driver. Location The study area is Europe. Methods (1) A multivariate analysis was applied to describe land‐cover distribution across Europe and assess if the land cover is determined by climate at large spatial scales. (2) To evaluate the importance of land cover to predict species distributions, we implemented a spatially explicit iterative procedure to predict species distributions of plants (2603 species), mammals (186 species), breeding birds (440 species), amphibian and reptiles (143 species). First, we ran bioclimatic models using stepwise generalized additive models using bioclimatic variables. Secondly, we carried out a regression of land cover (LC) variables against residuals from the bioclimatic models to select the most relevant LC variables. Finally, we produced mixed models including climatic variables and those LC variables selected as decreasing the residual of bioclimatic models. Then we compared the explanatory and predictive power of the pure bioclimatic against the mixed model. Results (1) At the European coarse resolution, land cover is mainly driven by climate. Two bioclimatic axes representing a gradient of temperature and a gradient of precipitation explained most variation of land‐cover distribution. (2) The inclusion of land cover improved significantly the explanatory power of bioclimatic models and the most relevant variables across groups were those not explained or poorly explained by climate. However, the predictive power of bioclimatic model was not improved by the inclusion of LC variables in the iterative model selection process. Main conclusion Climate is the major driver of both species and land‐cover distributions over Europe. Yet, LC variables that are not explained or weakly associated with climate (inland water, sea or arable land) are interesting to describe particular mammal, bird and tree distributions. However, the addition of LC variables to pure bioclimatic models does not improve their predictive accuracy. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Biogeography Wiley

Do we need land‐cover data to model species distributions in Europe?

Download PDF
9 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/do-we-need-land-cover-data-to-model-species-distributions-in-europe-oILEKHeJk4
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0305-0270
eISSN
1365-2699
DOI
10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00991.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Aim To assess the influence of land cover and climate on species distributions across Europe. To quantify the importance of land cover to describe and predict species distributions after using climate as the main driver. Location The study area is Europe. Methods (1) A multivariate analysis was applied to describe land‐cover distribution across Europe and assess if the land cover is determined by climate at large spatial scales. (2) To evaluate the importance of land cover to predict species distributions, we implemented a spatially explicit iterative procedure to predict species distributions of plants (2603 species), mammals (186 species), breeding birds (440 species), amphibian and reptiles (143 species). First, we ran bioclimatic models using stepwise generalized additive models using bioclimatic variables. Secondly, we carried out a regression of land cover (LC) variables against residuals from the bioclimatic models to select the most relevant LC variables. Finally, we produced mixed models including climatic variables and those LC variables selected as decreasing the residual of bioclimatic models. Then we compared the explanatory and predictive power of the pure bioclimatic against the mixed model. Results (1) At the European coarse resolution, land cover is mainly driven by climate. Two bioclimatic axes representing a gradient of temperature and a gradient of precipitation explained most variation of land‐cover distribution. (2) The inclusion of land cover improved significantly the explanatory power of bioclimatic models and the most relevant variables across groups were those not explained or poorly explained by climate. However, the predictive power of bioclimatic model was not improved by the inclusion of LC variables in the iterative model selection process. Main conclusion Climate is the major driver of both species and land‐cover distributions over Europe. Yet, LC variables that are not explained or weakly associated with climate (inland water, sea or arable land) are interesting to describe particular mammal, bird and tree distributions. However, the addition of LC variables to pure bioclimatic models does not improve their predictive accuracy.

Journal

Journal of Biogeography – Wiley

Published: Mar 1, 2004

References

  • Interactive effects of land cover and other factors on regional bird distributions
    Allen, Allen; O'Connor, O'Connor
  • The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe
    Araújo, Araújo
  • Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity
    Araújo, Araújo; Humphries, Humphries; Densham, Densham; Lampinen, Lampinen; Hagemeijer, Hagemeijer; Mitchell‐Jones, Mitchell‐Jones; Gasc, Gasc
  • A new model for the continuum concept
    Austin, Austin; Smith, Smith
  • Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds in spatially explicit models
    Bascompte, Bascompte; Solé, Solé
  • Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key
    Benton, Benton; Vickery, Vickery; Wilson, Wilson
  • Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis
    Braak, Braak
  • Large predators in the Alps: the fall and risemof man's competitors
    Breitenmoser, Breitenmoser
  • Effects of habitat type and management on the abundance of skylarks in the breeding season
    Chamberlain, Chamberlain; Wilson, Wilson; Browne, Browne; Vickery, Vickery
  • Predicting the spatial distribution of non‐indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent
    Collingham, Collingham; Wadsworth, Wadsworth; Huntley, Huntley; Hulme, Hulme
  • Heterogeneity, speciation/extinction history and climate: explaining regional plant diversity patterns in the Cape Floristic Region
    Cowling, Cowling; Lombard, Lombard
  • Effects of habitat disturbance on bird communities in riparian corridors
    Croonquist, Croonquist; Brooks, Brooks
  • The relationship between land‐use change and climate change
    Dale, Dale
  • Niche separation in community analysis: a new method
    Doledec, Doledec; Chessel, Chessel; Gimaret‐Carpentier, Gimaret‐Carpentier
  • Vegetation‐environment relationships in Atlantic European calcareous grasslands
    Duckworth, Duckworth; Bunce, Bunce; Malloch, Malloch
  • Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients
    Franklin, Franklin
  • Persistence and vulnerability: retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas
    Gaston, Gaston; Pressey, Pressey; Margules, Margules
  • Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology
    Guisan, Guisan; Zimmermann, Zimmermann
  • Plant diversity in Europe: Atlas Florae Europaeae and WORLDMAP
    Humphries, Humphries; Araújo, Araújo; Williams, Williams; Lampinen, Lampinen; Lahti, Lahti; Uotila, Uotila
  • Modelling potential future individual tree‐species distributions in the Eastern United States under climate change scenario: a case study with Pinus virginiana
    Iverson, Iverson; Prasad, Prasad; Schwartz, Schwartz
  • From dot maps to bitmaps – Altas Florae Europaeae goes digital
    Lahti, Lahti; Lampinen, Lampinen
  • Model‐based assessments of climate change effects on forests: a critical review
    Loehle, Loehle; LeBlanc, LeBlanc
  • Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields
    Mader, Mader
  • The effect of Mediterranean dehesa management on lizard distribution and conservation
    Martín, Martín; Lopez, Lopez
  • Factors affecting habitat occupancy by wolves in northern Apennines (northern Italy): a model of habitat suitability
    Massolo, Massolo; Meriggi, Meriggi
  • Developing regional and species‐level assessments of climate change impacts on biodiversity: a preliminary study in the Cape Floristic Region
    Midgley, Midgley; Hannah, Hannah; Millar, Millar; Thuiller, Thuiller; Booth, Booth
  • Predicting gray wolf landscape recolonization: logistic regression models vs. new field data
    Mladenoff, Mladenoff; Sickley, Sickley; Wydeven, Wydeven
  • An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression
    Pearce, Pearce; Ferrier, Ferrier
  • The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape‐level factors on wintering bird populations
    Pearson, Pearson
  • Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness
    Rahbek, Rahbek; Graves, Graves
  • Post‐war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain
    Robinson, Robinson; Sutherland, Sutherland
  • Diverse and contrasting effects of habitat fragmentation
    Robinson, Robinson; Holt, Holt; Gaines, Gaines; Hamburg, Hamburg; Johnson, Johnson; Fitch, Fitch; Martinko, Martinko
  • The importance of arable habitat for farmland birds in grassland landscapes
    Robinson, Robinson; Wilson, Wilson; Crick, Crick
  • Comparative analysis of spatial organization of desert lizard communities in Middle Asia and Mexico
    Shenbrot, Shenbrot; Rogovin, Rogovin; Surov, Surov
  • Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems
    Swets, Swets
  • Generalized models versus classification tree analysis: a comparative study for predicting spatial distributions of plant species at different scales
    Thuiller, Thuiller; Araújo, Araújo; Lavorel, Lavorel
  • Large‐scale environmental correlates of forest tree distributions in Catalonia (NE Spain)
    Thuiller, Thuiller; Vaydera, Vaydera; Pino, Pino; Sabaté, Sabaté; Lavorel, Lavorel; Gracia, Gracia
  • Relating plant traits and species distributions along bioclimatic gradients for 88 Leucadendron species in the Cape Floristic Region
    Thuiller, Thuiller; Lavorel, Lavorel; Midgley, Midgley; Lavergne, Lavergne; Rebelo, Rebelo
  • Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity
    Whittaker, Whittaker; Willis, Willis; Field, Field
  • Endemism and important areas for representing European biodiversity: a preliminary exploration of atlas data for plants and terrestrial vertebrates
    Williams, Williams; Humphries, Humphries; Araújo, Araújo; Lampinen, Lampinen; Hagemeijer, Hagemeijer; Gasc, Gasc; Mitchell‐Jones, Mitchell‐Jones
  • Species diversity‐scale matters
    Willis, Willis; Whittaker, Whittaker
  • The impact of low temperatures in controlling the geographical distribution of plants
    Woodward, Woodward
  • Predicting plant responses to global environmental change
    Woodward, Woodward

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial