Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/do-not-adjust-coefficients-in-shapley-value-regression-i9amxvgfth
References (21)
-
Becklake Becklake, Lalloo Lalloo (1990)
The ‘healthy smoker’: a phenomenon of health selection?Respiration, 57
-
Darlington Darlington (1968)
Multiple regression in psychological research and practicePsychological Bulletin, 69
-
Conklin (2004)
Customer satisfaction analysis: identification of key driversEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 154
-
Grömping Grömping (2007)
Estimators of relative importance in linear regression based on variance decompositionThe American Statistician, 61
-
Tu Tu, Gunnell Gunnell, Gilthorpe Gilthorpe (2008)
Simpson's paradox, Lord's paradox, and suppression effects are the same phenomenon—the reversal paradoxEmerging Themes in Epidemiologiy, 5
-
Judge Judge, Yancey Yancey (1981)
Sampling properties of an inequality‐restricted estimatorEconomics Letters, 7
-
Meinert Meinert, Frischer Frischer, Kühr Kühr (1994)
The healthy passive smoker: relationship between bronchial hyperactivity in school children and maternal smokingJournal of Epidemiol Community Health, 48
-
Arah Arah (2008)
The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson's paradox, Lord's paradox, and the suppression effect: covariate selection in the analysis of observational studiesEmerging Themes in Epidemiologiy, 5
-
Dorfman Dorfman, McIntosh McIntosh (2001)
Imposing inequality restrictions: efficiency gains from economic theoryEconomic Letters, 71
-
Hoffman Hoffman (1960)
The paramorphic representation of clinical judgmentPsychological Bulletin, 57
-
Kruskal Kruskal (1987)
Correction to ‘relative importance by averaging over orderings’The American Statistician, 41
-
Thomas Thomas, Hughes Hughes, Zumbo Zumbo (1998)
On variable importance in linear regressionSocial Indicators Research, 45
-
Stufken Stufken (1992)
On hierarchical partitioningThe American Statistician, 46
-
Mandel Mandel (2008)
Statistical modeling and business expertise, or where is the truth?Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 3
-
Lipovetsky (2001)
Analysis of regression in game theory approachApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 17
-
Grömping Grömping (2006)
Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpoJournal of Statistical Software, 17
-
Kruskal Kruskal (1987)
Relative importance by averaging over orderingsThe American Statistician, 41
-
Le Moual Le Moual, Kauffmann Kauffmann, Eisen Eisen, Kennedy Kennedy (2008)
The healthy worker effect in asthmaAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 177
-
Thomson Thomson, Schmidt Schmidt (1982)
A note on the comparison of the mean square error of inequality constrained least squares and other related estimatorsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 64
-
Budescu Budescu (1993)
Dominance analysis: a new approach to the problem of relative importance in multiple regressionPsychological Bulletin, 114
-
Johnson Johnson, Lebreton Lebreton (2004)
History use of relative importance indices in organizational researchOrganizational Research Methods, 7
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- ISSN
- 1524-1904
- eISSN
- 1526-4025
- DOI
- 10.1002/asmb.773
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Shapley value regression consists of assessing relative importance and accordingly adjusting regression coefficients. It is argued that adjustment of coefficients is unnecessary and even misleading for practically relevant situations. Examples are given, and an alternative procedure is proposed for situations for which the coefficients are requested to have a certain sign. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Journal
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2010