Development of a short form of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire

Development of a short form of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire • Patients' views on the quality of care are important and it is desirable that these can be assessed using short, yet valid and reliable instruments. • The aim of the work reported here was to develop and test a short version of an established questionnaire: Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP). • Patients (n=162, 79% response rate) receiving care at medical and surgical departments in two Swedish hospitals responded to the original QPP as well as to a newly developed short version. An ethical research committee approved the study. • Pearson correlations were computed between the long and short forms and differences between means were analysed with t‐tests. Reliability was estimated by computing Cronbach alpha coefficients. • Correlations of acceptable size were found between the short form and the original QPP. The short form also had acceptable reliability coefficients. • The strengths of the work are that the items in the short version are derived from a patient perspective and are formulated in words used by patients; the items still have a theoretical foundation, which makes the interpretation of results more meaningful; global formulations such as `What do you think about your care?' have been avoided; the short format should make the questionnaire more attractive for many patients to respond to. • Limitations are that results indicate that the short form does not fully measure what the long form does. Therefore, when the short form is used in practice, a two‐step procedure is suggested, where a follow‐up is done with a selection of items from the original long form. This selection could be restricted to areas where problems may be suspected, based on the results from the short form. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Clinical Nursing Wiley

Development of a short form of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/development-of-a-short-form-of-the-quality-from-the-patient-s-Gk90sjbtq0
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0962-1067
eISSN
1365-2702
D.O.I.
10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00640.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

• Patients' views on the quality of care are important and it is desirable that these can be assessed using short, yet valid and reliable instruments. • The aim of the work reported here was to develop and test a short version of an established questionnaire: Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP). • Patients (n=162, 79% response rate) receiving care at medical and surgical departments in two Swedish hospitals responded to the original QPP as well as to a newly developed short version. An ethical research committee approved the study. • Pearson correlations were computed between the long and short forms and differences between means were analysed with t‐tests. Reliability was estimated by computing Cronbach alpha coefficients. • Correlations of acceptable size were found between the short form and the original QPP. The short form also had acceptable reliability coefficients. • The strengths of the work are that the items in the short version are derived from a patient perspective and are formulated in words used by patients; the items still have a theoretical foundation, which makes the interpretation of results more meaningful; global formulations such as `What do you think about your care?' have been avoided; the short format should make the questionnaire more attractive for many patients to respond to. • Limitations are that results indicate that the short form does not fully measure what the long form does. Therefore, when the short form is used in practice, a two‐step procedure is suggested, where a follow‐up is done with a selection of items from the original long form. This selection could be restricted to areas where problems may be suspected, based on the results from the short form.

Journal

Journal of Clinical NursingWiley

Published: Sep 1, 2002

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off