Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Pennebaker, Thomas Lay (2002)
Language Use and Personality during Crises: Analyses of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's Press ConferencesJournal of Research in Personality, 36
T. Wilson, N. Brekke (1994)
Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.Psychological bulletin, 116 1
Adam Kowol (2008)
The theory of cognitive dissonance By
(1993)
Meditations on First Philosophy (S. Tweyman, Trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1641)
Whittlesea Whittlesea, Williams Williams (1998)
Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? The unexpected basis of feelings of familiarityActa Psychologica, 98
H. Einhorn, R. Hogarth (1986)
Judging probable cause.Psychological Bulletin, 99
(2002)
Confidence as inference from subjective experience. Talk presented at the meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Kansas City, MO
D. Mackinnon, C. Lockwood, J. Hoffman, S. West, V. Sheets (2002)
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.Psychological methods, 7 1
H. Grice (1975)
Logic and conversationSyntax and Semantics, 3
C. Spearman (1904)
General intelligence Objectively Determined and MeasuredAmerican Journal of Psychology, 15
D. Kahneman, S. Frederick (2002)
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
(1979)
The elements of style (3rd ed.)
A rose in any other font wouldn't smell as sweet: fluency effects in categorization
H. Kelley (1973)
The processes of causal attribution.American Psychologist, 28
Daniel Oppenheimer (2004)
Spontaneous Discounting of Availability in Frequency Judgment TasksPsychological Science, 15
(2005)
Ltd. Appl. Cognit. Psychol
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1971)
BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERSPediatrics
B. Whittlesea, Lisa Williams (2001)
The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 27 1
N. Schwarz (2004)
Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision MakingJournal of Consumer Psychology, 14
B. Whittlesea, Lisa Williams (1998)
Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity.Acta psychologica, 98 2-3
Bem (1995)
172Psychological Bulletin, 118
R. Reber, P. Winkielman, N. Schwarz (1998)
Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective JudgmentsPsychological Science, 9
Larry Jacoby, Judith Brown, Jennifer Jasechko (2004)
Becoming Famous Overnight : Limits on the Ability to Avoid Unconscious Influences of the Past
R. Reber, N. Schwarz (1999)
Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of TruthConsciousness and Cognition, 8
J. Pennebaker, L. King (1999)
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference.Journal of personality and social psychology, 77 6
Wm. Wright
General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured.Psychological Bulletin, 2
Daryl Bern (1995)
Writing a Review Article for Psychological Bulletin
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1973)
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityCognitive Psychology, 5
Schwarz Schwarz (2004)
Meta‐cognitive experiences in consumer decision makingJournal of Consumer Research, 14
B. Whittlesea, Lisa Williams (2001)
The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 27 1
Steele Steele (1997)
A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African‐AmericansAmerican Psychologist, 52
(1990)
Meditations on first philosophy (G. Heffernan, Trans.)
(1993)
An institutional analysis of the evolution of the denominational system in American Protestantism
C. Steele (1997)
A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.The American psychologist, 52 6
Most texts on writing style encourage authors to avoid overly‐complex words. However, a majority of undergraduates admit to deliberately increasing the complexity of their vocabulary so as to give the impression of intelligence. This paper explores the extent to which this strategy is effective. Experiments 1–3 manipulate complexity of texts and find a negative relationship between complexity and judged intelligence. This relationship held regardless of the quality of the original essay, and irrespective of the participants' prior expectations of essay quality. The negative impact of complexity was mediated by processing fluency. Experiment 4 directly manipulated fluency and found that texts in hard to read fonts are judged to come from less intelligent authors. Experiment 5 investigated discounting of fluency. When obvious causes for low fluency exist that are not relevant to the judgement at hand, people reduce their reliance on fluency as a cue; in fact, in an effort not to be influenced by the irrelevant source of fluency, they over‐compensate and are biased in the opposite direction. Implications and applications are discussed. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Applied Cognitive Psychology – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.