Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Dickinson Dickinson, Whiteley Whiteley (1972)
A sampling scheme for shallow snowpacksInt. Ass. Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 17
Steppuhn Steppuhn (1976)
Areal water equivalents for prairie snowcovers by centralized samplingProc. West. Snow Conf., 44
L. Larson, E. Peck (1974)
Accuracy of precipitation measurements for hydrologic modelingWater Resources Research, 10
D. Mckay, G. Thurtell (1978)
Measurements of the Energy Fluxes Involved in the Energy Budget of a Snow CoverJournal of Applied Meteorology, 17
W. Dickinson, H. Whiteley (1972)
A SAMPLING SCHEME FOR SHALLOW SNOWPACKSHydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 17
Vershinina Vershinina (1972)
Ratios between the water equivalents of snow in the field, forest, and ravine‐gully network in river basinsSov. Hydrol., 5
Williams Williams (1958)
Evaporation from snow covers in Eastern CanadaProc. East. Snow Conf., 15
B. Goodison (1978)
Accuracy of Canadian Snow Gage MeasurementsJournal of Applied Meteorology, 17
Goodison Goodison, McKay McKay (1978)
Canadian snowfall measurements: Some implications for the collection and analysis of data from remote stationsProc. West. Snow Conf., 46
W. Adams (1976)
Areal differentiation of snow cover in east central OntarioWater Resources Research, 12
The accuracy and compatibility of Canadian snowfall and snow survey data were investigated in the Cold Creek research basin in southern Ontario. Problems in obtaining compatible point measurements of snowfall precipitation from gauge and ruler measurements are discussed. However, it is shown that correction of gauge measurements (MSC Nipher, Universal, Fischer and Porter) of snowfall water equivalent for catch variations caused by environmental factors, notably wind speed, results in compatible storm or seasonal totals. Accurate statistics of basin snow cover were determined from snow courses specifically sited in relation to basin land use. At the time of peak accumulation, which might occur at any time during the winter, there was a statistically significant difference in snow cover between land use categories. Mean basin snow cover was calculated by weighting the snow survey measurements in proportion to basin land use. The need to consider the effect of changing land use on snow course measurements is demonstrated. Results show that as an alternative to direct snow survey measurements, accumulated precipitation may be used to estimate snow cover up to peak accumulation. Net snow cover determined from accumulated corrected gauge data less short‐term melt losses and snow evaporation was within the confidence limits of the basin mean snow cover measured during the winter. Compatible results are only achieved when precipitation measurements are corrected for gauge catch variations and snow survey data are representative of basin land use.
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 1981
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.