Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Diggle, I. Kaimi, R. Abellana (2010)
Partial‐Likelihood Analysis of Spatio‐Temporal Point‐Process DataBiometrics, 66
S. Lele (2009)
A New Method for Estimation of Resource Selection Probability Function, 73
E. Ziegel (2002)
Generalized Linear ModelsTechnometrics, 44
J. Fieberg, Jason Matthiopoulos, M. Hebblewhite, M. Boyce, Jacqueline Frair (2010)
Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365
C. Dormann (2007)
Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution dataGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 16
Steven Phillips, R. Anderson, R. Schapire (2006)
Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributionsEcological Modelling, 190
A. Guisan, W. Thuiller (2005)
Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models.Ecology letters, 8 9
S. Buckland, D. Elston (1993)
Empirical models for the spatial distribution of wildlifeJournal of Applied Ecology, 30
N. Cressie (1992)
Statistics for Spatial Data.Biometrics, 48
A. Chiang (2007)
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With RTechnometrics, 49
A. Guisan, N. Zimmermann, J. Elith, C. Graham, Steven Phillips, A. Peterson (2007)
WHAT MATTERS FOR PREDICTING THE OCCURRENCES OF TREES: TECHNIQUES, DATA, OR SPECIES' CHARACTERISTICS?Ecological Monographs, 77
M. Boyce, L. McDonald (1999)
Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions.Trends in ecology & evolution, 14 7
P. Diggle, B. Rowlingson (1994)
A Conditional Approach to Point Process Modelling of Elevated RiskJournal of The Royal Statistical Society Series A-statistics in Society, 157
A. Baddeley, Rolf Turner (1998)
Practical Maximum Pseudolikelihood for Spatial Point PatternsAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 42
A. Lehmann, J. Overton, J. Leathwick (2002)
GRASP: generalized regression analysis and spatial predictionEcological Modelling, 157
A. Baddeley, M. Berman, N. Fisher, Andrew Hardegen, R. Milne, Dominic Schuhmacher, Rohan Shah, Rolf Turner (2010)
Spatial logistic regression and change-of-support in Poisson point processesElectronic Journal of Statistics, 4
J. Gruijter, D. Brus, M. Bierkens, M. Knotters (2006)
Sampling for Natural Resource Monitoring
N. Webb, M. Hebblewhite, E. Merrill (2008)
Statistical Methods for Identifying Wolf Kill Sites Using Global Positioning System Locations, 72
M. Austin (2002)
Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modellingEcological Modelling, 157
A. Guisan, N. Zimmermann (2000)
Predictive habitat distribution models in ecologyEcological Modelling, 135
J. Dungan, J. Perry, M. Dale, P. Legendre, S. Citron-Pousty, Marie-Josée Fortin, A. Jakomulska, M. Miriti, M. Dungan, Perry, J. Dale, M. Citron-Pousty, S. Fortin, M. Rosenberg
A Balanced View of Scale in Spatial Statistical Analysis
J. Leathwick, J. Elith, M. Francis, T. Hastie, P. Taylor (2006)
Variation in demersal fish species richness in the oceans surrounding New Zealand: an analysis using boosted regression treesMarine Ecology Progress Series, 321
M. Hebblewhite, E. Merrill (2007)
Modelling wildlife–human relationships for social species with mixed‐effects resource selection modelsJournal of Applied Ecology, 45
C. Embling, P. Fernandes, P. Hammond, E. Armstrong (2005)
Investigations into the relationship between pelagic fish and dolphin distributions off the west coast of Scotland
P. Gilbert, S. Lele, Y. Vardi (2010)
Biometrika Trust Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Semiparametric Selection Bias Models with Application to AIDS Vaccine
Y. LindaJ. (2003)
Combining Incompatible Spatial Data
Jason Matthiopoulos (2003)
Model-supervised kernel smoothing for the estimation of spatial usageOikos, 102
J. Royle, J. Nichols, M. Kéry (2005)
Modelling occurrence and abundance of species when detection is imperfectOikos, 110
S. Lele, J. Keim (2006)
Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions.Ecology, 87 12
P. Diggle, R. Menezes, Ting-Li Su (2010)
Geostatistical inference under preferential samplingJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 59
J. Pearce, S. Ferrier (2001)
The practical value of modelling relative abundance of species for regional conservation planning: a case studyBiological Conservation, 98
B. Manly, L. McDonald, Dana Thomas (1993)
Resource Selection by Animals
K. Keating, S. Cherry (2004)
USE AND INTERPRETATION OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION IN HABITAT-SELECTION STUDIES, 68
S. Buckland, David Anderson, K. Burnham, J. Laake, D. Borchers, L. Thomas (2004)
Advanced distance sampling
Simon Wood (2006)
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R
B. Manly, L. McDonald, Dana Thomas (1994)
Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies.
P. Diggle (1990)
A point process modeling approach to raised incidence of a rare phenomenon in the vicinity of a prespecified point, 153
D. MacKenzie (2005)
Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence
R. Prentice, L. Gloeckler (1978)
Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data.Biometrics, 34 1
Douglas Johnson (1980)
THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCEEcology, 61
A. Jiménez‐Valverde, F. Diniz, Eduardo Azevedo, P. Borges (2009)
Species Distribution Models Do Not Account for Abundance: The Case of Arthropods on Terceira Island, 46
(1985)
1985)Multicollinearity.Encyclopaedia of Statistics (eds
S. Nielsen, Chris Johnson, D. Heard, M. Boyce (2005)
Can models of presence‐absence be used to scale abundance? Two case studies considering extremes in life historyEcography, 28
P. Gilbert, S. Lele, Y. Vardi (1999)
Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric selection bias models with application to AIDS vaccine trialsBiometrika, 86
J. Dungan, J. Perry, M. Dale, P. Legendre, S. Citron-Pousty, Marie-Josée Fortin, A. Jakomulska, M. Miriti, M. Rosenberg (2002)
A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysisEcography, 25
J. Elith, Catherine Graham, Robert Anderson, Miroslav Dudı́k, Simon Ferrier, A. Guisan, R. Hijmans, F. Huettmann, J. Leathwick, Anthony Lehmann, Jin Li, Lúcia Lohmann, Bette Loiselle, G. Manion, Craig Moritz, Miguel Nakamura, Yoshinori Nakazawa, J. Overton, A. Peterson, Steven Phillips, Karen Richardson, R. Scachetti-Pereira, R. Schapire, Jorge Soberón, Stephen Williams, M. Wisz, N. Zimmermann (2006)
Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence dataEcography, 29
D. MacKenzie, J. Royle (2005)
Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effortJournal of Applied Ecology, 42
A. Mysterud, R. Ims (1998)
FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES IN HABITAT USE: AVAILABILITY INFLUENCES RELATIVE USE IN TRADE-OFF SITUATIONSEcology, 79
Jacqueline Frair, S. Nielsen, E. Merrill, S. Lele, M. Boyce, Robin Munro, G. Stenhouse, H. Beyer (2004)
Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studiesJournal of Applied Ecology, 41
Warton Warton, Shepherd Shepherd (2010)
Poisson point process models solve the ‘pseudo‐absence problem’ for presence‐only data in ecologyThe Annals of Applied Statistics, 4
P. Cheek, P. McCullagh, J. Nelder (1990)
Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn.Applied statistics, 39
D. Warton, L. Shepherd (2010)
Correction note: Poisson point process models solve the “pseudo-absence problem” for presence-only data in ecologyThe Annals of Applied Statistics, 4
Devin Johnson, Dana Thomas, J. Hoef, Aaron Christ (2008)
A General Framework for the Analysis of Animal Resource Selection from Telemetry DataBiometrics, 64
J. Drake, C. Randin, A. Guisan (2006)
Modelling ecological niches with support vector machinesJournal of Applied Ecology, 43
Leona Svancara, E. Garton, Kang-Tsung Chang, J. Scott, P. Zager, M. Gratson (2002)
The inherent aggravation of aggregation: An example with elk aerial survey dataJournal of Wildlife Management, 66
A. Guisan, T. Edwards, T. Hastie (2002)
Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the sceneEcological Modelling, 157
J. Pearce, M. Boyce (2006)
Modelling distribution and abundance with presence‐only dataJournal of Applied Ecology, 43
N. Cressie (1993)
Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics
A. Hirzel, A. Guisan (2002)
Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modellingEcological Modelling, 157
D. Jelinski, Jianguo Wu (1996)
The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecologyLandscape Ecology, 11
P. Fauchald, T. Tveraa (2003)
USING FIRST‐PASSAGE TIME IN THE ANALYSIS OF AREA‐RESTRICTED SEARCH AND HABITAT SELECTIONEcology, 84
Jason Matthiopoulos, M. Hebblewhite, G. Aarts, J. Fieberg (2011)
Generalized functional responses for species distributions.Ecology, 92 3
G. Aarts, M. Mackenzie, B. McConnell, M. Fedak, Jason Matthiopoulos (2008)
Estimating space‐use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry dataEcography, 31
C. Dormann, J. McPherson, M. Araújo, R. Bivand, J. Bolliger, G. Carl, R. Davies, A. Hirzel, W. Jetz, W. Kissling, I. Kühn, R. Ohlemüller, P. Peres‐Neto, B. Reineking, B. Schröder, F. Schurr, R. Wilson (2007)
Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data : a reviewEcography, 30
Jason Matthiopoulos (2003)
The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preferenceEcological Modelling, 159
Summary 1. The need to understand the processes shaping population distributions has resulted in a vast increase in the diversity of spatial wildlife data, leading to the development of many novel analytical techniques that are fit‐for‐purpose. One may aggregate location data into spatial units (e.g. grid cells) and model the resulting counts or presence–absences as a function of environmental covariates. Alternatively, the point data may be modelled directly, by combining the individual observations with a set of random or regular points reflecting habitat availability, a method known as a use‐availability design (or, alternatively a presence – pseudo‐absence or case–control design). 2. Although these spatial point, count and presence–absence methods are widely used, the ecological literature is not explicit about their connections and how their parameter estimates and predictions should be interpreted. The objective of this study is to recapitulate some recent statistical results and illustrate that under certain assumptions, each method can be motivated by the same underlying spatial inhomogeneous Poisson point process (IPP) model in which the intensity function is modelled as a log‐linear function of covariates. 3. The Poisson likelihood used for count data is a discrete approximation of the IPP likelihood. Similarly, the presence–absence design will approximate the IPP likelihood, but only when spatial units (i.e. pixels) are extremely small (Electric Journal of Statistics, 2010, 4, 1151–1201). For larger pixel sizes, presence–absence designs do not differentiate between one or multiple observations within each pixel, hence leading to information loss. 4. Logistic regression is often used to estimate the parameters of the IPP model using point data. Although the response variable is defined as 0 for the availability points, these zeros do not serve as true absences as is often assumed; rather, their role is to approximate the integral of the denominator in the IPP likelihood (The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2010, 4, 1383–1402). Because of this common misconception, the estimated exponential function of the linear predictor (i.e. the resource selection function) is often assumed to be proportional to occupancy. Like IPP and count models, this function is proportional to the expected density of observations. 5. Understanding these (dis‐)similarities between different species distribution modelling techniques should improve biological interpretation of spatial models and therefore advance ecological and methodological cross‐fertilization.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.