Comments on the development of an oral health‐related self‐efficacy scale for use with older adults

Comments on the development of an oral health‐related self‐efficacy scale for use with older... Dear Editor,We read the article by Ohara et al. with great interest. Although the results were very interesting, there is an important methodological issue that needs to be raised in order to avoid misinterpretation.The authors developed and validated the Geriatric Self‐Efficacy Scale for Oral Health questionnaire on the same dataset. Here, is it crucial to emphasize that developing and validating a questionnaire on the same dataset can lead to over optimistic estimates of validity of the questionnaire. In other words, estimates of validity of the questionnaire might suffer from an overfitting problem; that is, performance of the questionnaire is well described only for the observed data, but its performance is still not valid for new and independent subjects. Split sampling is a commonly used method for questionnaire development and validation so that the dataset is split into two parts, one part for developing and the other for validation. In other words, in one part of the dataset the construct of the questionnaire will be identified by exploratory factor analysis, and in the reminder, its validity will be tested by confirmatory factor analysis. The authors recruited a remarkable sample size (n = 646 Japanese older people) for the study; however, we are wondering why the authors did no attempt to split the dataset and to determine the validity of the Geriatric Self‐Efficacy Scale for Oral Health questionnaire in the proper way.A take home message for readers is that questionnaire development and validation on the same dataset is a common mistake in biomedical research.AcknowledgementThis work was not supported by any organization.Disclosure statementThe authors declare no conflict of interest.ReferencesOhara Y, Yoshida N, Kawai H et al. Development of an oral health‐related self‐efficacy scale for use with older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 1406–1411.Barke A, Bleichhardt G, Rief W, Doering BK. The Cyberchondria severity scale (CSS): German validation and development of a short form. Int J Behav Med 2016; 23: 595–605.Duarte C, Pinto‐Gouveia J, Ferreira C, Silva B. Caught in the struggle with food craving: development and validation of a new cognitive fusion measure. Appetite 2016; 101: 146–155.Norris J, Carpenter JG, Eaton J et al. The development and validation of the Interprofessional attitudes scale: assessing the Interprofessional attitudes of students in the health professions. Acad Med 2015; 90: 1394–1400.Sum RK, Ha AS, Cheng CF et al. Construction and validation of a perceived physical literacy instrument for physical education teachers. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0155610.Ayubi E, Mansori K, Khazaei S. Translation, adaptation, and validation of Hindi version of the pain catastrophizing scale: statistical issues of confirmatory factor analysis to avoid misinterpretation. Pain Med 2017; 18: 390–391.Safiri S, Ayubi E. Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the xerostomia questionnaire in head and neck cancer patients: methodological issues to avoid misinterpretation. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25: 2363.Safiri S, Ayubi E. Linguistic and psychometric validation of the Malaysian version of diabetes quality of life‐brief clinical inventory (DQoL‐BCI): methodological issues to avoid to misinterpretation. Res Social Adm Pharm 2017; 13: 398. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Geriatrics & Gerontology International Wiley

Comments on the development of an oral health‐related self‐efficacy scale for use with older adults

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/wiley/comments-on-the-development-of-an-oral-health-related-self-efficacy-PS3zkvIpCz
Publisher
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Copyright
© 2018 Japan Geriatrics Society
ISSN
1444-1586
eISSN
1447-0594
D.O.I.
10.1111/ggi.13242
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Dear Editor,We read the article by Ohara et al. with great interest. Although the results were very interesting, there is an important methodological issue that needs to be raised in order to avoid misinterpretation.The authors developed and validated the Geriatric Self‐Efficacy Scale for Oral Health questionnaire on the same dataset. Here, is it crucial to emphasize that developing and validating a questionnaire on the same dataset can lead to over optimistic estimates of validity of the questionnaire. In other words, estimates of validity of the questionnaire might suffer from an overfitting problem; that is, performance of the questionnaire is well described only for the observed data, but its performance is still not valid for new and independent subjects. Split sampling is a commonly used method for questionnaire development and validation so that the dataset is split into two parts, one part for developing and the other for validation. In other words, in one part of the dataset the construct of the questionnaire will be identified by exploratory factor analysis, and in the reminder, its validity will be tested by confirmatory factor analysis. The authors recruited a remarkable sample size (n = 646 Japanese older people) for the study; however, we are wondering why the authors did no attempt to split the dataset and to determine the validity of the Geriatric Self‐Efficacy Scale for Oral Health questionnaire in the proper way.A take home message for readers is that questionnaire development and validation on the same dataset is a common mistake in biomedical research.AcknowledgementThis work was not supported by any organization.Disclosure statementThe authors declare no conflict of interest.ReferencesOhara Y, Yoshida N, Kawai H et al. Development of an oral health‐related self‐efficacy scale for use with older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 1406–1411.Barke A, Bleichhardt G, Rief W, Doering BK. The Cyberchondria severity scale (CSS): German validation and development of a short form. Int J Behav Med 2016; 23: 595–605.Duarte C, Pinto‐Gouveia J, Ferreira C, Silva B. Caught in the struggle with food craving: development and validation of a new cognitive fusion measure. Appetite 2016; 101: 146–155.Norris J, Carpenter JG, Eaton J et al. The development and validation of the Interprofessional attitudes scale: assessing the Interprofessional attitudes of students in the health professions. Acad Med 2015; 90: 1394–1400.Sum RK, Ha AS, Cheng CF et al. Construction and validation of a perceived physical literacy instrument for physical education teachers. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0155610.Ayubi E, Mansori K, Khazaei S. Translation, adaptation, and validation of Hindi version of the pain catastrophizing scale: statistical issues of confirmatory factor analysis to avoid misinterpretation. Pain Med 2017; 18: 390–391.Safiri S, Ayubi E. Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the xerostomia questionnaire in head and neck cancer patients: methodological issues to avoid misinterpretation. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25: 2363.Safiri S, Ayubi E. Linguistic and psychometric validation of the Malaysian version of diabetes quality of life‐brief clinical inventory (DQoL‐BCI): methodological issues to avoid to misinterpretation. Res Social Adm Pharm 2017; 13: 398.

Journal

Geriatrics & Gerontology InternationalWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial