Clinical Grading of Spinal Osteoporosis: Quality of Life Components and Spinal Deformity in Women with Chronic Low Back Pain and Women with Vertebral Osteoporosis

Clinical Grading of Spinal Osteoporosis: Quality of Life Components and Spinal Deformity in Women... Clinical consequences of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, such as back pain, functional limitations, and impairment of mood, are often cited as justification for prevention and therapy. But these symptoms are poorly characterized, and a clinical grading system is not available. The aim of this study was to compare clinical measures for spinal deformation and quality of life components between patients with osteoporosis and patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and to determine the relationship between spinal deformation and quality of life components. A total of 130 female patients (63 osteoporotic patients, 65 ± 7.9 years, and 77 CLBP patients, 56 ± 6.5 years) had a standardized interview on quality of life components (pain, activities of daily life, mood) and clinical measures of spinal deformation (height reduction (HR), distance from occiput to wall (DOW), and distance from iliac crest to ribs (DIR)). Spinal X‐rays were reviewed in all patients for the evidence of vertebral fractures. In osteoporotic patients, vertebral deformity was quantified by the spine deformity index (SDI) on X‐rays. It was assessed whether subgroups could be identified by a combination of indices for spinal deformation (SDI, HR, DOW) using a cluster analysis. Back pain was a major complaint in both groups, without differences in pain intensity and frequency. Impairment of general well being and mood was found in about one‐third of the patients in both groups. Independent of age, the disability score was significantly higher in patients with osteoporosis than in patients with CLBP. Both groups differed with respect to clinical measures of spinal deformity (HR, DOW, DIR). Among osteoporotic patients, parameters of quality of life were not linearly related to the degree of radiologically assessed vertebral deformity, but osteoporotic patients with two or more vertebral fractures tended to have more functional limitations than those with only one fracture. There was, however, a significant linear relationship between components of quality of life (disability score, pain) and clinical measures of spinal deformation (HR, DOW, DIR). The osteoporotic patients were subdivided into three clusters. The first group was characterized by low spinal deformation (↓SDI, ↓HR, ↓DOW) and little impairment of quality of life. The second group had significantly greater spinal deformation (↑SDI, ↑HR, ↑DOW) and significantly more pain and functional limitations. The third group was characterized by increased kyphosis, mainly caused by nonskeletal dysfunction (↓SDI, ↓HR, ↑DOW), but pain and functional limitations were impaired to the same degree as in the second group with severe skeletal spinal deformation. We conclude that with respect to quality of life components, functional limitation is the most specific to spinal osteoporosis and is related to clinical measures of spinal deformation. Furthermore, spinal deformation and the clinical course of osteoporosis appears to be insufficiently reflected by radiological indices of vertebral deformity (such as SDI) alone. For grading the disease and for therapeutical concepts, radiological measures and clinical evaluation should be considered in combination. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Wiley

Clinical Grading of Spinal Osteoporosis: Quality of Life Components and Spinal Deformity in Women with Chronic Low Back Pain and Women with Vertebral Osteoporosis

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/clinical-grading-of-spinal-osteoporosis-quality-of-life-components-and-T3bEzhhpFA
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 ASBMR
ISSN
0884-0431
eISSN
1523-4681
DOI
10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.4.663
pmid
9101379
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Clinical consequences of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, such as back pain, functional limitations, and impairment of mood, are often cited as justification for prevention and therapy. But these symptoms are poorly characterized, and a clinical grading system is not available. The aim of this study was to compare clinical measures for spinal deformation and quality of life components between patients with osteoporosis and patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and to determine the relationship between spinal deformation and quality of life components. A total of 130 female patients (63 osteoporotic patients, 65 ± 7.9 years, and 77 CLBP patients, 56 ± 6.5 years) had a standardized interview on quality of life components (pain, activities of daily life, mood) and clinical measures of spinal deformation (height reduction (HR), distance from occiput to wall (DOW), and distance from iliac crest to ribs (DIR)). Spinal X‐rays were reviewed in all patients for the evidence of vertebral fractures. In osteoporotic patients, vertebral deformity was quantified by the spine deformity index (SDI) on X‐rays. It was assessed whether subgroups could be identified by a combination of indices for spinal deformation (SDI, HR, DOW) using a cluster analysis. Back pain was a major complaint in both groups, without differences in pain intensity and frequency. Impairment of general well being and mood was found in about one‐third of the patients in both groups. Independent of age, the disability score was significantly higher in patients with osteoporosis than in patients with CLBP. Both groups differed with respect to clinical measures of spinal deformity (HR, DOW, DIR). Among osteoporotic patients, parameters of quality of life were not linearly related to the degree of radiologically assessed vertebral deformity, but osteoporotic patients with two or more vertebral fractures tended to have more functional limitations than those with only one fracture. There was, however, a significant linear relationship between components of quality of life (disability score, pain) and clinical measures of spinal deformation (HR, DOW, DIR). The osteoporotic patients were subdivided into three clusters. The first group was characterized by low spinal deformation (↓SDI, ↓HR, ↓DOW) and little impairment of quality of life. The second group had significantly greater spinal deformation (↑SDI, ↑HR, ↑DOW) and significantly more pain and functional limitations. The third group was characterized by increased kyphosis, mainly caused by nonskeletal dysfunction (↓SDI, ↓HR, ↑DOW), but pain and functional limitations were impaired to the same degree as in the second group with severe skeletal spinal deformation. We conclude that with respect to quality of life components, functional limitation is the most specific to spinal osteoporosis and is related to clinical measures of spinal deformation. Furthermore, spinal deformation and the clinical course of osteoporosis appears to be insufficiently reflected by radiological indices of vertebral deformity (such as SDI) alone. For grading the disease and for therapeutical concepts, radiological measures and clinical evaluation should be considered in combination.

Journal

Journal of Bone and Mineral ResearchWiley

Published: Apr 1, 1997

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off