City Markets as a Unit of Analysis in Audit Research and the Re‐Examination of Big 6 Market Shares

City Markets as a Unit of Analysis in Audit Research and the Re‐Examination of Big 6 Market Shares Big 6 market shares based on aggregate national data have been used in prior research to infer market leadership and industry expertise, and to differentiate Big 6 accounting firms from one another. In this study it is demonstrated that further differences exist with respect to city‐specific audit markets, both between firms and within the same firm across different city markets. The specific finding is that the national market leader is not the city‐specific market leader the vast majority of time. Usefulness of the city‐level unit of analysis is further demonstrated by re‐examining the 1989 mergers creating Ernst & Young and Deloitte Touche. The primary effect of the Ernst & Young merger was to increase market shares in cities in which the pre‐merger firms already had significant market shares, resulting in an increase in the number of cities in which the merged firm achieved top ranking. In contrast, the primary effect of the Deloitte Touche merger was an expansionof the number of city‐level markets in which the merged firm had significant (though not leading) market shares. The findings of this study suggest that, in order to move beyond our current understanding, important audit research questions such as the reason for particular auditor–client alignments, the competitive nature of markets, audit pricing of reputations, and auditor reporting and independence issues should be investigated in city‐level markets where audit contracting occurs and where Big 6 market shares (and presumably reputations) vary widely from city to city. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Abacus Wiley

City Markets as a Unit of Analysis in Audit Research and the Re‐Examination of Big 6 Market Shares

Abacus, Volume 35 (2) – Jun 1, 1999

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/city-markets-as-a-unit-of-analysis-in-audit-research-and-the-re-rtoLwMV0IN
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1999
ISSN
0001-3072
eISSN
1467-6281
DOI
10.1111/1467-6281.00040
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Big 6 market shares based on aggregate national data have been used in prior research to infer market leadership and industry expertise, and to differentiate Big 6 accounting firms from one another. In this study it is demonstrated that further differences exist with respect to city‐specific audit markets, both between firms and within the same firm across different city markets. The specific finding is that the national market leader is not the city‐specific market leader the vast majority of time. Usefulness of the city‐level unit of analysis is further demonstrated by re‐examining the 1989 mergers creating Ernst & Young and Deloitte Touche. The primary effect of the Ernst & Young merger was to increase market shares in cities in which the pre‐merger firms already had significant market shares, resulting in an increase in the number of cities in which the merged firm achieved top ranking. In contrast, the primary effect of the Deloitte Touche merger was an expansionof the number of city‐level markets in which the merged firm had significant (though not leading) market shares. The findings of this study suggest that, in order to move beyond our current understanding, important audit research questions such as the reason for particular auditor–client alignments, the competitive nature of markets, audit pricing of reputations, and auditor reporting and independence issues should be investigated in city‐level markets where audit contracting occurs and where Big 6 market shares (and presumably reputations) vary widely from city to city.

Journal

AbacusWiley

Published: Jun 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off