Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Being and Love: Schleiermacher, Aquinas and Augustine

Being and Love: Schleiermacher, Aquinas and Augustine This article makes the case for speaking not of divine “attributes” but of divine “names.” There are good scriptural grounds for advancing the thesis that love is not just another divine name, but the name which designates God's very nature, i.e. who God is. Schleiermacher made that case. This essay argues that “Love,” as a divine name, should be paired with “being” (which is also, for theologians like Augustine and Aquinas, a “biblical” name), since God does not “have” love or being, but is love and is “being itself.” http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Modern Theology Wiley

Being and Love: Schleiermacher, Aquinas and Augustine

Modern Theology , Volume 34 (3) – Jan 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/being-and-love-schleiermacher-aquinas-and-augustine-oTokR18s9F
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN
0266-7177
eISSN
1468-0025
DOI
10.1111/moth.12431
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article makes the case for speaking not of divine “attributes” but of divine “names.” There are good scriptural grounds for advancing the thesis that love is not just another divine name, but the name which designates God's very nature, i.e. who God is. Schleiermacher made that case. This essay argues that “Love,” as a divine name, should be paired with “being” (which is also, for theologians like Augustine and Aquinas, a “biblical” name), since God does not “have” love or being, but is love and is “being itself.”

Journal

Modern TheologyWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.