Assessment of different sample processing procedures applied to the determination of melatonin in plants

Assessment of different sample processing procedures applied to the determination of melatonin in... Introduction – Melatonin, an indoleamine well known in vertebrates and structurally related to other important substances such as tryptophan or indole‐3‐acetic acid, is also present in the plant kingdom although its specific function(s) remain to be established. The emerging field of melatonin studies in plants has progressed very slowly, mainly due to the problems associated with melatonin quantification in plants. Objective – Two commonly used procedures for plant samples are compared. The analytical characteristics of both procedures are quantitatively presented using different solvents and small amounts of fresh biological material, and the respective recovery rates and quantitative limits are presented. Some improvements are suggested. Methodology – Two different sample extraction procedures were compared: a direct‐sample extraction (DSE) and a homogenised‐ sample extraction (HSE). Melatonin was then determined in the respective plant samples by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Results – Using the DSE procedure, more than 94% melatonin was recovered from standard solutions, whereas levels higher than 93% were recovered from the spiked plant samples, with little difference between ethyl acetate and chloroform extractions. In the case of HSE, the recoveries of melatonin were approximately half and never higher than 55%. The ultrasonic treatment proposed in the DSE procedure showed different levels of efficiency (2–20%), depending on the sample. Conclusion – This study has established that, with the direct sample extraction procedure, higher recovery rates are obtained both in standard solutions and in plant samples. The straightforwardness and reproducibility of the extraction procedure is accompanied by the high sensitivity obtained with fluorescence detection. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Phytochemical Analysis Wiley

Assessment of different sample processing procedures applied to the determination of melatonin in plants

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/assessment-of-different-sample-processing-procedures-applied-to-the-l6CNhyjXcK
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN
0958-0344
eISSN
1099-1565
DOI
10.1002/pca.1083
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Introduction – Melatonin, an indoleamine well known in vertebrates and structurally related to other important substances such as tryptophan or indole‐3‐acetic acid, is also present in the plant kingdom although its specific function(s) remain to be established. The emerging field of melatonin studies in plants has progressed very slowly, mainly due to the problems associated with melatonin quantification in plants. Objective – Two commonly used procedures for plant samples are compared. The analytical characteristics of both procedures are quantitatively presented using different solvents and small amounts of fresh biological material, and the respective recovery rates and quantitative limits are presented. Some improvements are suggested. Methodology – Two different sample extraction procedures were compared: a direct‐sample extraction (DSE) and a homogenised‐ sample extraction (HSE). Melatonin was then determined in the respective plant samples by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Results – Using the DSE procedure, more than 94% melatonin was recovered from standard solutions, whereas levels higher than 93% were recovered from the spiked plant samples, with little difference between ethyl acetate and chloroform extractions. In the case of HSE, the recoveries of melatonin were approximately half and never higher than 55%. The ultrasonic treatment proposed in the DSE procedure showed different levels of efficiency (2–20%), depending on the sample. Conclusion – This study has established that, with the direct sample extraction procedure, higher recovery rates are obtained both in standard solutions and in plant samples. The straightforwardness and reproducibility of the extraction procedure is accompanied by the high sensitivity obtained with fluorescence detection. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal

Phytochemical AnalysisWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2009

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off