Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of managed forests: a case study from temperate Australia

Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of managed forests: a case study from temperate... Summary 1 The concept of assessing forests for carbon sequestration is well established. Operationally, estimating a forests’ potential to sequester carbon requires comparing its current carbon state with a prediction of its carbon carrying capacity (CCC). Assessment of CCC is, however, problematic. Mathematical models can be used, although traditional modelling techniques, where parameters are estimated from empirical measurements, are usually limited by a lack of field data. For example, estimates of carbon residency times in vegetation and soil are not generally available, nor are they easily measured. Alternative methods are required. 2 Current carbon stocks in 17 previously logged field sites were measured by field survey. CCC for those sites was then predicted using a terrestrial carbon model, calibrated with measurements from mature, unlogged vegetation of a comparable forest type. Model parameters were estimated using ‘model–data fusion’ methods, where the model is inverted and field measurements of the carbon stocks (the model outputs) are used to calibrate the model parameters. Spatial variation was included through functions defining landscape‐scale effects on plant growth relating to topographic influences on light and soil water availability. 3 Current above‐ground carbon stocks (living plus litter) varied with management history, averaging 273 ± 30 tC ha−1 (mean ± SE). Model‐predicted CCC was 445 ± 13 tC ha−1, yielding a carbon sequestration potential of 172 ± 31 tC ha−1. Model simulations predicted the recovery of an average site to take 53 years to reach 75% carrying capacity, and 152 years to reach 90% carrying capacity. Extrapolation of these results to 7 Mha of comparable managed forests in the same region suggested a potential carbon sink of 680–895 Mt C. 4 Synthesis and applications. In this study we have demonstrated that forests recovering from prior logging have the potential to store significant amounts of carbon, with current biomass stocks estimated to be approximately 60% of their predicted carrying capacity, a value similar to those reported for northern temperate forests. Although sequestration activities often focus on the aforestation and reforestation of previously cleared land, our results suggest that, where appropriate, native forest management should also be considered when developing terrestrial carbon management options, and for terrestrial carbon accounting more generally. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Ecology Wiley

Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of managed forests: a case study from temperate Australia

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/assessing-the-carbon-sequestration-potential-of-managed-forests-a-case-v1aANHGGmW
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0021-8901
eISSN
1365-2664
D.O.I.
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01221.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary 1 The concept of assessing forests for carbon sequestration is well established. Operationally, estimating a forests’ potential to sequester carbon requires comparing its current carbon state with a prediction of its carbon carrying capacity (CCC). Assessment of CCC is, however, problematic. Mathematical models can be used, although traditional modelling techniques, where parameters are estimated from empirical measurements, are usually limited by a lack of field data. For example, estimates of carbon residency times in vegetation and soil are not generally available, nor are they easily measured. Alternative methods are required. 2 Current carbon stocks in 17 previously logged field sites were measured by field survey. CCC for those sites was then predicted using a terrestrial carbon model, calibrated with measurements from mature, unlogged vegetation of a comparable forest type. Model parameters were estimated using ‘model–data fusion’ methods, where the model is inverted and field measurements of the carbon stocks (the model outputs) are used to calibrate the model parameters. Spatial variation was included through functions defining landscape‐scale effects on plant growth relating to topographic influences on light and soil water availability. 3 Current above‐ground carbon stocks (living plus litter) varied with management history, averaging 273 ± 30 tC ha−1 (mean ± SE). Model‐predicted CCC was 445 ± 13 tC ha−1, yielding a carbon sequestration potential of 172 ± 31 tC ha−1. Model simulations predicted the recovery of an average site to take 53 years to reach 75% carrying capacity, and 152 years to reach 90% carrying capacity. Extrapolation of these results to 7 Mha of comparable managed forests in the same region suggested a potential carbon sink of 680–895 Mt C. 4 Synthesis and applications. In this study we have demonstrated that forests recovering from prior logging have the potential to store significant amounts of carbon, with current biomass stocks estimated to be approximately 60% of their predicted carrying capacity, a value similar to those reported for northern temperate forests. Although sequestration activities often focus on the aforestation and reforestation of previously cleared land, our results suggest that, where appropriate, native forest management should also be considered when developing terrestrial carbon management options, and for terrestrial carbon accounting more generally.

Journal

Journal of Applied EcologyWiley

Published: Dec 1, 2006

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off