ANZSRS Oral Presentations

ANZSRS Oral Presentations AO 001WINDS OF CHANGE: BRONCHODILATOR RESPONSIVENESS FROM MORE THAN ONE DIRECTIONPloen L1, Southwell P2, Micalos P3, Swanney M11Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2Charles Sturt University, Orange, Australia, 3Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, AustraliaIntroductionPositive bronchodilator responsiveness (BR) using current American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria, purportedly ensures spirometric variability is significantly exceeded. The ATS/ERS guidelines acknowledge there is no clear consensus about what constitutes bronchodilator responsiveness in subjects with airflow obstruction.AimThis study investigated the individual variability in multiple spirometric parameters in patients having reversibility tests. We address how spirometric variability can inform current guidelines for identifying a clinically significant bronchodilator response.Method102 consenting participants performed slow vital capacity (SVC) and flow volume loops (FVL) before and after Salbutamol administration. Measurement of symptom control used the clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire and dyspnoea and wheeze used the visual analogue scale. Two determinants of BR: ATS/ERS criteria and a t‐score calculation were compared by correlation with the subjective measurements of respiratory impairment.Results63 participants had positive bronchodilator responses by t‐score calculation compared with 16 by current ATS/ERS guidelines. T‐scores showed a weaker correlation with subjective measures of respiratory impairment than per cent and absolute change. Inspiratory vital capacity (IVC), http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Respirology Wiley

ANZSRS Oral Presentations

Respirology , Volume 23 – Jan 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/anzsrs-oral-presentations-D9kLjHZAWv
Publisher
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Copyright
© 2018 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology
ISSN
1323-7799
eISSN
1440-1843
D.O.I.
10.1111/resp.13265
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AO 001WINDS OF CHANGE: BRONCHODILATOR RESPONSIVENESS FROM MORE THAN ONE DIRECTIONPloen L1, Southwell P2, Micalos P3, Swanney M11Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2Charles Sturt University, Orange, Australia, 3Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, AustraliaIntroductionPositive bronchodilator responsiveness (BR) using current American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria, purportedly ensures spirometric variability is significantly exceeded. The ATS/ERS guidelines acknowledge there is no clear consensus about what constitutes bronchodilator responsiveness in subjects with airflow obstruction.AimThis study investigated the individual variability in multiple spirometric parameters in patients having reversibility tests. We address how spirometric variability can inform current guidelines for identifying a clinically significant bronchodilator response.Method102 consenting participants performed slow vital capacity (SVC) and flow volume loops (FVL) before and after Salbutamol administration. Measurement of symptom control used the clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire and dyspnoea and wheeze used the visual analogue scale. Two determinants of BR: ATS/ERS criteria and a t‐score calculation were compared by correlation with the subjective measurements of respiratory impairment.Results63 participants had positive bronchodilator responses by t‐score calculation compared with 16 by current ATS/ERS guidelines. T‐scores showed a weaker correlation with subjective measures of respiratory impairment than per cent and absolute change. Inspiratory vital capacity (IVC),

Journal

RespirologyWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off